The field of European economic governance and austerity policies: Exploratory elements (2002–2012)
Frédéric Lebaron
(1, 2)
,
Didier Georgakakis
(3, 4)
Frédéric Lebaron
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 1147352
- ORCID : 0000-0002-1459-2161
- IdRef : 052572838
Didier Georgakakis
- Fonction : Auteur
- PersonId : 1158859
- IdHAL : didier-georgakakis
- ORCID : 0000-0003-2282-8506
Résumé
Abstract In this paper, we establish the theoretical topography of a sample of these actors, their dispositions and their resources to grasp the relational dynamics (including the dynamics of inertia and of change) at work in the translation of the economic, social and political inputs into policy choices. This way of doing seems to us a good means to contribute to the current debate on the unexpected resilience of austerity policies and the need for ‘structural reforms’ at the EU level. How to explain, indeed, that whereas many observers thought after the first Obama election that the end of 2000 would mark a ‘lasting paradigm change’ to neo-Keynesianism the advisability of pursuing a new policy was so rapidly shut down? How to sociologically contribute to explain the strong continuity of the former paradigm inside European institutions and simultaneously the rather marginal adjustments it underwent?
Domaines
Science politiqueFormat du dépôt | Notice |
---|---|
Type de dépôt | Article dans une revue |
Titre |
en
The field of European economic governance and austerity policies: Exploratory elements (2002–2012)
|
Résumé |
en
Abstract In this paper, we establish the theoretical topography of a sample of these actors, their dispositions and their resources to grasp the relational dynamics (including the dynamics of inertia and of change) at work in the translation of the economic, social and political inputs into policy choices. This way of doing seems to us a good means to contribute to the current debate on the unexpected resilience of austerity policies and the need for ‘structural reforms’ at the EU level. How to explain, indeed, that whereas many observers thought after the first Obama election that the end of 2000 would mark a ‘lasting paradigm change’ to neo-Keynesianism the advisability of pursuing a new policy was so rapidly shut down? How to sociologically contribute to explain the strong continuity of the former paradigm inside European institutions and simultaneously the rather marginal adjustments it underwent?
|
Auteur(s) |
Frédéric Lebaron
1, 2
, Didier Georgakakis
3, 4
1
IDHES -
Institutions et Dynamiques Historiques de l'Économie et de la Société
( 243735 )
- Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense bât T., bureau 218 200 avenue de la République 92000 Nanterre
-IDHE.S-Evry - Université d¹Evry Val d¹Essonne - BD François Mitterand - 91000 Evry
- France
2
ENS Paris Saclay -
Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay
( 523723 )
- 4 avenue des Sciences, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette
- France
3
UP1 UFR11 -
Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - UFR Science Politique
( 119674 )
- 17, rue de la Sorbonne - 75231 Paris cedex 05
- France
4
CESSP -
Centre européen de sociologie et de science politique
( 161589 )
- France
|
Langue du document |
Anglais
|
Nom de la revue |
|
Vulgarisation |
Non
|
Comité de lecture |
Oui
|
Audience |
Internationale
|
Date de publication |
2021-07-13
|
Volume |
2
|
Numéro |
1
|
Page/Identifiant |
47-82
|
Domaine(s) |
|
DOI | 10.1163/25903276-bja10021 |
Loading...