Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Le symbole est-il diabolique ? Duplicité(s) du signe en question

Abstract : Is the linguistic sign, traditionally conceived as a symbol (from the Greek sym + bol ‘putting two faces together’), diabolical (from the Greek dia 'to separate')? That is the question arised by this second issue of Signifiances (Signifying), which proposes questioning the duplicity or, more exactly, the duplicities of the sign. The articles presented emanate from researchers from various theoretical horizons; but the studies gathered here bear witness to the same concern: the desire to question, to challenge, what is usually considered as given. All the terms of the definition of the sign as an arbitrary union of a signifier and a signified, symbolizing a portion of reality, are here questioned, each paper being particularly interested in this or that aspect of this conception. The elements of the definition are not seen as objects with a positive existence but rather as dynamic processes (speaker experience) or as the result of constitutive points of view of linguistic entities (biased linguist), and most of the contributions are based on the signifier as a dynamic process.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [29 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Marine Poirier <>
Submitted on : Friday, January 11, 2019 - 12:38:25 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, May 2, 2019 - 4:12:10 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Friday, April 12, 2019 - 2:24:34 PM


Files produced by the author(s)


  • HAL Id : halshs-01978168, version 1


Élodie Blestel, Chrystelle Fortineau-Brémond, Marine Poirier. Le symbole est-il diabolique ? Duplicité(s) du signe en question. Signifiances (Signifying), Université Clermont Auvergne, 2018, Le symbole est-il diabolique ? Duplicité(s) du signe en question, 2 (1), pp.I-X. ⟨halshs-01978168⟩



Record views


Files downloads