Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Designing REDD+ contracts to resolve additionality issues

Abstract : To address the issue of potential information asymmetries inherent in the estimation of deforestation baselines required by the current Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation+ (REDD+) scheme, we offer a theoretical analysis of an extended scheme relying on the theory of incentives. We compare two types of contracts: a deforestation-based contract and a policy-based contract. Each of them implies a dramatically different information rent/efficiency trade-off due to domestic implementation and transaction costs. If the contract is deforestation-based (resp. policy-based), information rents are awarded to countries with the ex ante lowest (resp. highest) intended deforestation. We show that a general contract can be offered to recipient countries in which the type of instrument proposed is endogenous, independent of the historical trend, unlike the current REDD+ mechanism. Dividing countries into two groups corresponding to the deforestation-based instrument and the policy-based instrument helps the donor country to obtain efficient deforestation and avoided deforestation levels.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [54 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01643656
Contributor : Caroline Bauer Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Tuesday, November 21, 2017 - 3:56:59 PM
Last modification on : Friday, August 5, 2022 - 2:38:10 PM

File

REDD_18July2017.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Citation

Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, Jean-Christophe Poudou, Sébastien Roussel. Designing REDD+ contracts to resolve additionality issues. Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, 2018, 51, pp.1-17. ⟨10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.10.004⟩. ⟨halshs-01643656⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

768

Files downloads

1534