On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity - HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article dans une revue Linguistics and Philosophy Année : 1995

On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity

Résumé

It is argued that two different types of concept are often intermingled in discussions of Aktionsart. The most common type of classification is one of situation types, relating to the potential actualisation of a situation, although some of the definitions have to do with the actual realization of the situation. This distinction, adequately captured by the notions (a)telicty and (un)boundedness (Declerck 1989), is explored and it is shown how NPs, PPs and tense influence a sentence's classification as (un)bounded.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Depraetere_1995_Linguistics & Philosophy.pdf ( 2.16 Mo ) Télécharger
Origine : Accord explicite pour ce dépôt
Loading...

Dates et versions

halshs-00625758, version 1 (22-09-2011)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : halshs-00625758 , version 1

Citer

Ilse Depraetere. On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1995, 18 (1), pp.1-19. ⟨halshs-00625758⟩
256 Consultations
417 Téléchargements
Dernière date de mise à jour le 28/04/2024
comment ces indicateurs sont-ils produits

Partager

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Plus