Routinization-Biased Technical Change, Globalization and Labor Market Polarization: Does Theory Fit the Facts?

Jaewon Jung (1) , Jean Mercenier (2, 3)

1 THEMA - Théorie économique, modélisation et applications
2 TEPP - Travail, Emploi et Politiques Publiques
3 ERMES - Equipe de recherche sur les marches, l'emploi et la simulation

There is now ample evidence that jobs and wages have been polarizing at the extremes of the skill distribution since the early 90s. Autor, Levy and Murnane (2003) have suggested that this might be due to technology substituting more easily for labor in performing routine rather than non-routine tasks. Other potential explanations include globalization. Active empirical research has now identified important stylized facts. The aim of this paper is to provide a theoretical exploration of alternative potential causes to this labor market polarization, and to identify which, if any, are consistent with the stylized facts.

Mots clés: Skill Demands; Job Tasks; Polarization; Inequality; Technological Change; Routinization; Offshoring

Domaines: Economies et finances

Jaewon Jung, Jean Mercenier. Routinization-Biased Technical Change, Globalization and Labor Market Polarization: Does Theory Fit the Facts?. 2010. ⟨halshs-00856105⟩