.. .. Chapitre-6--contexte,

, Rappel de la problématique, de la question de recherche et de la méthodologie, p.92

.. .. Fonctionnalités,

, Terrain de recherche -trois cas de cyberadministration

, Hypothèse émergeant des cas de cyberadministration -Les situations de gestion normales et extrêmes

P. Du-problème-de-recherche and .. .. ,

.. .. Chapitre-7--méthodologie,

, Méthodes de conception et d'évaluation de l'artefact

, Chapitre 8 -Description de l'artefact

. .. Exigences-fonctionnelles,

, Release 1 -Questionnaires d'évaluation de l'efficacité de SI

. .. Back-end,

, Évaluation de l'approche de DSR adoptée dans la thèse

.. .. Si,

, Chapitre 11 -Conclusion de la seconde partie

H. M. Abdullah and A. M. Zeki, Frontend and backend web technologies in social networking sites: Facebook as an example, Proceedings -3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Science Applications and Technologies, vol.2014, pp.85-89, 2014.

A. Adrot and J. Pallud, Crisis Response and IT Use: Literature Review and Suggestions for Future Research, AMCIS 2009, pp.2909-2918, 2009.

I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour, 1980.

I. Ajzen, The theory of planned behavior. Orgnizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.50, pp.179-211, 1991.

S. Alter, Defining information systems as work systems: implications for the IS field, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.17, issue.5, pp.448-469, 2008.

A. , Le canton du Jura fait un pas en direction du vote électronique, 2018.

A. , Fusion Peseux-Neuchâtel : recours déposé. Le Matin, 2018.

A. , Fusion de Peseux : recours au tribunal cantonal, 2019.

N. Au, E. W. Ngai, and T. C. Cheng, A critical review of end-user information system satisfaction research and a new research framework, Omega, vol.30, issue.6, pp.451-478, 2002.

D. E. Avison, R. M. Davison, and J. Malaurent, Information systems action research: Debunking myths and overcoming barriers, Information and Management, vol.55, issue.2, pp.177-187, 2018.

C. Bach, P. Salembier, and E. Dubois, Co-conception d'expériences interactives augmentées dédiées aux situations muséales, International conference on Association Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine -IHM '06, pp.11-18, 2006.

J. Ballantine, M. Bonner, M. Levy, A. Martin, I. Munro et al., The 3-D model of information systems success: the search for the dependent variable continues, Information Resources Management Journal, vol.9, issue.4, pp.5-15, 1996.

J. Ballantine, M. Bonner, M. Levy, A. Martin, I. Munro et al., , 1998.

, Developing a 3-D model of information systems success, Information systems success measurement, pp.46-59

H. Barki, S. Rivard, and J. Talbot, A Keyword Classification Scheme for IS Research Literature: An Update, MIS Quarterly, vol.17, pp.209-227, 1993.

R. L. Baskerville, What design science is not, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.17, issue.5, pp.441-443, 2008.

R. L. Baskerville, A. Baiyere, S. Gregor, A. Hevner, and M. Rossi, Design Science Research Contributions: Finding a Balance between Artifact and Theory, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol.19, issue.5, pp.358-376, 2018.

R. L. Baskerville, M. Kaul, and V. C. Storey, Genres of inquiry in design-science research: Justification and evaluation of knowledge production, MIS Quarterly, vol.39, issue.3, pp.541-564, 2015.

R. L. Baskerville and M. D. Myers, Special Issue on Action Research in Information Systems -Making IS Research Relevant To Practice -Foreword, MIS Quarterly, vol.28, issue.3, pp.329-335, 2004.

R. Baskerville, J. Pries-heje, and J. Venable, Soft Design Science Methodology. International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, vol.9, p.11, 2009.

C. ;. Baudet and . Iae-lyon, L'influence de la participation des utilisateurs sur le succès des systèmes d'information, Business Science Institute, 2015.

C. Baudet, Rapprochons les communautés des universitaires et des professionnels spécialistes des TI sur la thématique de l'évaluation des systèmes d'information, AIM 2018, p.12, 2018.

C. Baudet and C. Benoit, Elargissez votre vision ! Le cas du vote électronique pour les personnes en situation de handicap visuel, AIM 2019, pp.1-12, 2019.

C. Baudet and J. Heim, Diagnostic des pratiques managériales agiles des relations collectivités publiques-associations dans le cadre d'une recherche-intervention, 2018.

, Management & Avenir, vol.3, issue.101, pp.163-185

C. Baudet and J. Lebraty, Fred D. Davis, l'acceptation d'un modèle par les SI, Les grands auteurs en systèmes d'information, pp.115-134, 2018.

P. Beaulieu and M. Kalika, La création de connaissance par les managers (BSI), 2015.

, EMS

K. Beck, Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, 2004.

K. Beck, Test Driven Development: By Example, 2004.

I. Benbasat and R. W. Zmud, Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance, MIS Quarterly, vol.23, issue.1, pp.3-16, 1999.

S. Berberat and P. Sunier, Modélisation des données Partie 1 : SMART Model et génération de code pour une base de données relationnelle, Programmez!, vol.201, pp.68-71, 2016.

R. E. Boyatzis, Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development, 1998.

J. D. Bringer, L. H. Johnston, and C. H. Brackenridge, Using Computer-Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software to Develop a Grounded Theory Project, Field Methods, vol.18, issue.3, pp.245-266, 2006.

A. Ceric, Bringing together evaluation and management of ICT value: a systems theory approach, Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, vol.18, issue.1, pp.19-35, 2015.

P. P. Chen, The entity-relationship model-toward a unified view of data, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), vol.1, issue.1, pp.9-36, 1976.

T. Chen, W. Shang, Z. M. Jiang, A. E. Hassan, M. Nasser et al., , 2014.

, Detecting performance anti-patterns for applications developed using object-relational mapping, International Conference on Software Engineering, pp.1001-1012

I. Hyderabad,

G. J. Churchill, A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs, Journal of Marketing Research, pp.64-73, 1979.

C. W. Churchman and .. H. Schainblatt, The Researcher and The Manager: A Dialectic of Implementation, Management Science, vol.11, issue.4, 1965.

. Cigref, Valeur et performance des systèmes d'information, 2009.

. Cigref, Le Cigref, 2018.

. Cigref, Modèle d'analyse et de benchmarking des coûts informatiques, 2018.

. Cigref, Valeur économique des projets de transformation numérique pour l'entreprise, 2018.

. Cnrtl, Etymologie de évaluation, 2012.

M. J. Cobo, A. G. López-herrera, E. Herrera-viedma, and F. Herrera, SciMAT: A New Science Mapping Analysis Software Tool, Journal of the American Society for Information Science And Technology, vol.63, issue.8, pp.1609-1630, 2012.

E. F. Codd, A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks, Communications of the ACM, vol.13, issue.6, pp.377-387, 1970.

E. F. Codd, Extending the Database Relational Model to capture More Meaning, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol.4, issue.4, pp.397-434, 1979.

M. Cohn, User Stories Applied: For Agile Software Development, 2004.

, Le Conseil fédéral approuve les bases de la stratégie suisse de cyberadministration, pp.2020-2023, 2018.

B. Dahlbom, The new informatics, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol.8, issue.2, p.3, 1996.

T. H. Davenport and M. L. Markus, Rigor vs. Relevance Revisited: Response to Benbasat and Zmud, MIS Quarterly, vol.23, issue.1, pp.19-23, 1999.

F. D. Davis, A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-user Information Systems: Theory and Results. Doctoral dissertation, 1986.

F. D. Davis, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, vol.13, issue.3, pp.319-340, 1989.

F. D. Davis, R. Bagozzi, and P. Warshaw, User acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of two Theoretical Models, Management Science, vol.35, issue.8, pp.982-1003, 1989.

F. D. Davis and V. Venkatesh, A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: Three experiments, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol.45, issue.1, pp.19-45, 1996.

F. De-singly, Le questionnaire, 2012.

,. De-vaujany, Les grandes approches théoriques du système d'information, 2009.

W. H. Delone and E. R. Mclean, Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable, Information Systems Research, vol.3, issue.1, pp.60-95, 1992.

W. H. Delone and E. R. Mclean, The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol.19, issue.4, pp.9-30, 2003.

W. H. Delone and E. R. Mclean, Information Systems Success Measurement. Foundations and Trends® in Information Systems, vol.2, pp.1-116, 2016.

A. Drechsler and A. R. Hevner, A Four-Cycle Model of IS Design Science Research : Capturing the Dynamic Nature of IS Artifact Design, 11th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, 2016.

H. Dumez, Jacques Girin, la sociologie de la parole et le tympan de Conques. Le Libellio d'Aegis, vol.6, pp.5-11, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00546685

S. Dzhumalieva, F. Noel, and S. Baudu, Value Assessment Tool for ICT Projects at the European Commission, ISACA Journal, vol.2, pp.1-7, 2011.

E. Suisse, eGovernment -rapport annuel, 2008.

. E-government-suisse, La cyberadministration suisse en bref, 2019.

.. Enjeu, M. Gallais, and C. Schmitt, Pour une approche des organisations par les situations de gestion : apports conceptuels et méthodologiques, Larousse. Retrieved from www.larousse.fr F Fabbri, pp.1-28, 2010.

B. Farbey, F. Land, and D. Targett, Moving IS evaluation forward: learning themes and research issues, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol.8, issue.2, pp.189-207, 1999.

B. Farbey, F. F. Land, and D. Targett, A taxonomy of information systems applications: the benefits' ladder, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.4, issue.1, pp.41-50, 1995.

J. Fawcett and F. Downs, The relationship of theory and research, 1986.

M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, 1975.

C. Foucault-dumas, Les départements IT doivent reprenser leurs métriques. ICTjournal, p.41, 2018.

M. Fowler, Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture, 2003.

. Boston,

M. Fowler, , 2007.

M. Fowler, Making Architecture Matter. In O'Reilly Open Source Convention, 2015.

J. E. Frisk, F. Bannister, and R. Lindgren, Evaluation of information system investments: A value dials approach to closing the theory-practice gap, Journal of Information Technology, vol.30, issue.3, pp.276-292, 2015.

S. Ganassali, Enquêtes et analyse de données avec Sphinx, 2014.

D. Giauque and Y. Emery, Repenser la gestion publique: Bilan et perspectives en Suisse. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, 2008.

J. Girin, Analyse empirique des situations de gestion : éléments de théorie et méthode, Epistémologie et Sciences de gestion, pp.141-182, 1990.

B. G. Glaser, Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory, 1978.

B. G. Glaser, , 2014.

B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss, The Discovery of grounded theory : Strategies for qualitative research, 1967.

O. Glassey, Administration en ligne : quand les utilisateurs deviennent des agents publics, Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, pp.423-441, 2013.

C. Godé, V. Hauch, M. Lasou, and J. Lebraty, Une singularité dans l ' aide à la décision : le cas de la Liaison 16. Systèmes d'information et Management, vol.17, pp.9-38, 2012.

S. Gregor, The nature of theory in information systems, Management Information Systems Quarterly, vol.30, issue.3, p.611, 2006.

S. Gregor and A. Hevner, Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact, MIS Quarterly, vol.37, issue.2, pp.337-355, 2013.

M. Grimsley and A. Meehan, e-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.16, issue.2, pp.134-148, 2007.

S. Hamilton and N. L. Chervany, Evaluating Information System Effectiveness -Part I: Comparing Evaluation Approaches, MIS Quarterly, vol.5, issue.3, pp.55-69, 1981.

J. He and W. R. King, The Role of User Participation in Information Systems Development: Implications from a Meta-Analysis, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol.25, issue.1, pp.301-331, 2008.

F. Heimerl, S. Lohmann, S. Lange, and T. Ertl, Word Cloud Explorer: Text Analytics based on Word clouds, Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp.1833-1842, 2014.

J. Heumann, Introduction to Business Modeling Using the Unified Modeling Language (UML). The Rational Edge, pp.1-7, 2001.

A. R. Hevner, A Three Cycle View of Design Science Research A Three Cycle View of Design Science Research, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol.19, issue.2, pp.87-92, 2007.

A. R. Hevner and S. Chatterjee, Design Research in Information Systems: Theory and Practice, vol.22, 2010.

A. R. Hevner, S. T. March, P. Jinsoo, and S. Ram, Design Science in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly, vol.28, issue.1, pp.75-105, 2004.

A. Hevner, J. Vom-brocke, and A. Maedche, Roles of Digital Innovation in Design Science Research, Business and Information Systems Engineering, vol.61, issue.1, pp.3-8, 2019.

A. J. Hutchison, L. H. Johnston, and J. D. Breckon, Using QSR-NVivo to facilitate the development of a grounded theory project: an account of a worked example, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol.13, issue.4, pp.283-302, 2010.

, IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems, IEEE Computer Society, pp.1471-2000, 2000.

J. Iivari, A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol.19, issue.2, pp.39-64, 2007.

, Larousse, 2018.

Z. Irani and P. Love, Evaluation Information Systems, 2008.

Z. Irani, P. E. Love, and A. Montazemi, e-Government: past, present and future, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.16, issue.2, pp.103-105, 2007.

. Isaca, , 2012.

. Isaca, ISACA' s COBIT Assessment Programme, 2014.

. Isaca, About ISACA, 2018.

. Itrb, Managing Information Systems: a Practical Assessment Tool, 1999.

V. Johnson, R. Torres, Q. Nguyen, M. Snyder, L. Kappelman et al., , 2017.

H. Jomaa, Contribution de l'Usage des SI à la Performance de l'entreprise, 2007.

K. Jonsen, J. Fendt, and S. Point, Convincing Qualitative Research: What Constitutes Persuasive Writing, Organizational Research Methods, pp.1-38, 2017.

L. K-kappelman, IT Trends Study. Mount Laurel, 2018.

L. Kappelman, E. R. Mclean, V. Johnson, and R. R. Torres, The 2017 SIM IT Issues and Trends Study, MIS Quarterly Executive, vol.17, issue.1, pp.53-88, 2018.

P. G. Keen, MIS Research: Reference Disciplines and a Cumulative Tradition, International Conference on Information Systems, pp.9-18, 1980.

A. Kieser and L. Leiner, Why the Rigour -Relevance Gap in Management Research Is Unbridgeable, Journal of Management Studies, vol.46, issue.3, pp.516-533, 2009.

G. Klein, Le Parlement jurassien fait volte-face et refuse le vote électronique, 2018.

P. Kotze, A. Van-der-merwe, and A. Gerber, Design Science Research as Research Approach in Doctoral Studies, Proceedings of the 21st Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS'2015, pp.1-14, 2015.

D. M. Kroenke, Using MIS, 2007.

P. Kruchten, Introduction au Rational Unified Process, 2000.

K. Kumar, Post implementation evaluation of computer-based information systems: current practices, Communications of the ACM, vol.33, issue.2, pp.203-212, 1990.

C. L-larman, UML et les Design Patterns, 2004.

K. Laudon and J. Laudon, Management des systèmes d'information, 2013.

K. Layne and J. Lee, Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model, Government Information Quarterly, vol.18, pp.122-136, 2001.

,. Le-moigne, Les épistémologies constructivites. (PUF, 2012.

J. Lebraty, SI et situations extrêmes. Systèmes d'information & Management, vol.18, p.3, 2013.

P. Lièvre, État et développement d'un programme de recherche, Revue Française de Gestion, vol.42, issue.257, pp.79-94, 2016.

O. I. Lindland, G. Sindre, and A. Solvberg, Understanding Quality in Conceptual Modeling, IEEE Software, vol.11, issue.2, pp.42-49, 1994.

H. C. Lucas, The Use of an Accounting In formation System , Action and Organizational Performance, The Accounting Review, vol.50, issue.4, pp.735-746, 1975.

R. O. Mason, Measuring information output: A communication systems approach, Information & Management, vol.1, issue.4, pp.219-234, 1978.

J. L. Mckenney and P. G. Keen, How Managers' Minds Work, Harvard Business Review, 1974.

S. Michel and C. Baudet, William H. DeLone et Ephraim R. McLean, l'évaluation du succès des SI, Les grands auteurs en systèmes d'information, pp.175-196, 2018.

S. Michel and F. Cocula, L'évaluation des systèmes d'information : un état de l'art à la lumière des approches de la variance et processuelles, Management et Avenir, vol.74, pp.33-51, 2014.

N. Minvielle and M. Lauquin, , 2015.

, About the journal, MISQE, 2018.

S. Missonier, Une typologie de la complexité, Gestion de Projet et Innovation, pp.25-38, 2014.

M. Moore, Creating Public Value -Strategic Management in Government, 1995.

J. Muntermann, R. Nickerson, and U. Varshney, Towards the Development of a Taxonomic Theory, 21th Americas Conference on Information Systems, pp.1-15, 2015.

B. Niehaves, On Epistemological Pluralism in Design Science, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol.19, issue.2, pp.93-104, 2007.

B. Niehaves, A. Simons, R. Plattfaut, A. Cleven, J. Vom-brocke et al., , 2015.

, Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Challenges and Recommendations of Literature Search in Information Systems Research, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol.37, issue.1, pp.205-244

F. Nietzche, Mille et un buts, Ainsi parlait Zarathoustra, 1883.

O. O'brien and J. A. , Management Information Systems: Managing Information Technology in the Internetworked Enterprise, 1999.

A. Osterwalder, The Business Model Ontology: A Proposition in a Design Science Approach, 2004.

C. Oussalah, G. Talens, and M. F. Colinas, Concepts and methods for version modeling, European Design Automation Conference, pp.332-337, 1993.

P. Paillé and A. Mucchielli, L'analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales, 2016.

A. Parasuraman, V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry, SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale For Measuring Consumer Perc, Journal of Retailing, vol.64, issue.1, p.12, 1988.

A. Pascal, Le design science dans le domaine des systèmes d'information : mise en débat et perspectives. Systèmes d'information et Management, vol.17, 2012.

A. Pascal and A. Renaud, 15 ans de recherche en Design Science : Une rétrospective bibliométrique, AIM 2019, 2019.

A. Pascal and É. Rouby, Les scénarios d'usage comme support aux méthodologies de Recherche en Design Science dans le cas d'invention, Systèmes d'information & management, vol.22, 2017.

R. J. Paul, Challenges to information systems: Time to change, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.16, issue.3, pp.193-195, 2007.

K. Peffers, T. Tuunanen, and B. Niehaves, Design science research genres: introduction to the special issue on exemplars and criteria for applicable design science research, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.27, issue.2, pp.129-139, 2018.

K. Peffers, T. Tuunanen, M. Rothenberger, and S. Chatterjee, A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol.24, issue.3, pp.45-77, 2008.

S. Petter, W. H. Delone, and E. R. Mclean, The Past , Present , and Future of " IS Success, Journal of the Association for Informaiton Systems, vol.13, pp.341-362, 2012.

S. Petter, W. H. Delone, and E. R. Mclean, Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Independent Variables, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol.29, issue.4, pp.7-62, 2013.

L. F. Pitt, R. T. Watson, and C. B. Karvan, Service Quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness, MIS Quarterly, vol.19, issue.2, pp.173-188, 1995.

S. Point and C. Voynnet, Le codage à visée théorique, Recherche et Applications En Marketing, vol.21, issue.4, pp.61-78, 2006.

P. Powell, Information technology evaluation: is it different, Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol.43, issue.1, pp.29-42, 1992.

P. Suisse, , 2017.

N. P. Rana, Y. K. Dwivedi, M. D. Williams, and V. Weerakkody, Investigating success of an e-government initiative: Validation of an integrated IS success model, Information Systems Frontiers, vol.17, issue.1, pp.127-142, 2014.

L. Raymond, L'impact des systèmes d'information sur la performance de l'entreprise, Faire de la recherche en systèmes d'information, pp.301-320, 2002.

J. Recker, Scientific Research in Information Systems: A Beginner's Guide (Progress in IS), 2012.

R. Reix, B. Fallery, M. Kalika, and F. Rowe, Systèmes d'information et management des organisations, 2011.

A. Richard, Le canton de Genève renonce à sa plate-forme de vote électronique, 2018.

P. G. Rowe, Design Thinking, 1987.

J. Saldana, An Introduction to Codes and Coding, The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, pp.1-31, 2012.

H. Savall and V. Zardet, Recherche en sciences de gestion : approche qualimétrique : Observer l'objet complexe, Economica, 2004.

M. Scott, W. H. Delone, and W. Golden, Measuring eGovernment success: a public value approach, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.25, issue.3, pp.187-208, 2016.

P. B. Seddon, A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success, Information Systems Research, vol.8, issue.3, pp.240-253, 1997.

P. Seddon and M. Kiew, A partial test and development of DeLone and McLean's model of IS success, Australasian Journal of Information Systems, vol.4, issue.1, pp.90-109, 1996.

M. K. Sein, O. Henfridsson, S. Purao, M. Rossi, and R. Lindgren, Action Design Research, MIS Quarterly, vol.35, issue.1, p.37, 2011.

V. Sethi and W. R. King, Development of Measures to Assess the Extent to Which an Information Technology Application Provides Competitive Advantage, Management Science, vol.40, issue.12, pp.1601-1627, 1994.

M. Sewak and S. Singh, Winning in the Era of Serverless Computing and Function as a Service -IEEE Conference Publication, International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT), pp.1-5, 2018.

C. E. Shannon and W. Weaver, The mathematical theory of communication, vol.19, p.1, 1949.

H. A. Simon, Les sciences de l'artificiel (Folio essa), 1996.

S. Smithson and R. Hirschheim, Analysing information systems evaluation: another look at an old problem, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.7, issue.3, pp.158-174, 1998.

X. Song and N. Letch, Research on IT / IS Evaluation : A 25 Year Review, The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, vol.15, issue.3, pp.276-287, 2012.

P. R. Steffens, C. S. Weeks, P. Davidsson, and L. Isaak, Shouting From the Ivory Tower: A Marketing Approach to Improve Communication of Academic Research to Entrepreneurs, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, vol.38, pp.399-426, 2014.

J. Sun and J. T. Teng, The construct of information systems use benefits: Theoretical explication of its underlying dimensions and the development of a measurement scale, International Journal of Information Management, vol.37, issue.5, pp.400-416, 2017.

P. Sunier, Modèle physique de données relationnel Oracle, 2019.

V. J. Symons, A review of information systems evaluation: content, context and process, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.1, issue.3, pp.205-212, 1991.

G. Talens, C. Oussalah, and M. F. Colinas, Versions of Simple and Composite Objects, International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp.62-72, 1993.

H. Tardieu, A. Rochfeld, and R. Coletti, La méthode Merise : Principes et outils, 1983.

D. Te'eni, S. Seidel, J. Brocke, and . Vom, Stimulating dialog between information systems research and practice, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.26, issue.6, pp.541-545, 2017.

A. Valentin, A. Lancry, and C. Lemarchand, La construction des échantillons dans la conception ergonomique de produits logiciels pour le grand public. Quel quantitatif pour les études qualitatives ?, Le Travail Humain, vol.73, issue.3, pp.261-290, 2010.

A. Van-de-ven and P. E. Johnson, Knowledge for Theory and Practice, Academy of Management Journal, vol.31, issue.4, pp.802-821, 2006.

E. Van-eyk, L. Toader, S. Talluri, L. Versluis, A. Uta et al., Serverless is More: From PaaS to Present Cloud Computing, IEEE Internet Computing, vol.22, issue.5, pp.8-17, 2018.

V. Venkatesh, Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model, Information Systems Research, 2000.

V. Venkatesh, S. Brown, and H. Bala, Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly, vol.37, issue.1, pp.21-54, 2013.

V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model : Four Longitudinal Field Studies, Management Science, vol.46, issue.2, pp.186-204, 2000.

V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View, MIS Quarterly, vol.27, issue.3, pp.425-478, 2003.

J. Vom-brocke, A. Simons, B. Niehaves, K. Reimer, R. Plattfaut et al., , 2009.

, Recontructing The Giant: on the Importance of Rigour in Documenting the Litterature Search Process

J. G. Walls, G. R. Widmeyer, O. A. Sawy, and . El, Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS, Information Systems Research, vol.3, issue.1, pp.36-59, 1992.

I. Walsh, Découvrir de nouvelles théories (BSI), 2015.

I. Walsh, M. Kalika, and C. Dominguez-péry, Les grands auteurs en systèmes d'information, Editions EMS, 2018.

I. Walsh and A. Renaud, L'analyse de co-citations pour guider la lecture et aider l'interprétation de la littérature d'un champ de recherche, AIM 2015, pp.1-28, 2015.

. Rabat,

I. Walsh and A. Renaud, Reviewing the literature in the IS field: Two bibliometric techniques to guide readings and help interpretation of the literature. Systèmes d'Information et Management, vol.22, pp.75-115, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01991305

J. Webster and R. Watson, Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review, MIS Quarterly, pp.13-23, 2002.

Y. Yu and F. D. Davis, The Determinants of IS User Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction: A Text Mining Approach, Americas Conference on Information Systems, 2017.

I. Zupic and T. ?ater, Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization, Organizational Research Methods, vol.18, issue.3, pp.429-472, 2015.

.. .. Résumé,

. .. Résumé,

. .. Mots-clés,

. .. Remerciements,

. .. Sommaire-synthétique,

, Les systèmes d'information, un objet de recherche

. Problématique and .. .. De-recherche,

, L'évaluation des systèmes d'information, une préoccupation des praticiens et des chercheurs du domaine

.. .. Méthodologie,

, Première partie -L'évaluation des SI : entre modèles théoriques et pratiques professionnelles

, Chapitre 1 -Revue de littérature : l'évaluation des systèmes d'information

, La thématique de l'évaluation en systèmes d'information

L. ,

S. .. Le,

. .. Chapitre-2--méthodologie, 41 Identification des caractéristiques de la notion d'évaluation en SI : une vue des chercheurs

, Identification des caractéristiques de la notion d'évaluation en SI : une vue des praticiens

, Identification des caractéristiques convergentes et divergentes entre la vue des chercheurs et celle des praticiens

, Caractéristiques de la notion d'évaluation en SI : une vue des chercheurs en SI, p.60

, Caractéristiques de la notion d'évaluation en SI : une vue des praticiens en SI, p.66

, 75 Traits saillants des caractéristiques de la notion d'évaluation

, Confusion sur l'objet sur lequel portent les évaluations

, Zones d'ombre et opportunités de recherche en évaluation

, D'une évaluation spontanée à une évaluation rigoureuse et pragmatique

, Chapitre 5 -Conclusion de la première partie, vol.87

, Seconde partie -Un artefact pour évaluer l'efficacité

.. .. Chapitre-6--contexte,

, Rappel de la problématique, de la question de recherche et de la méthodologie, p.92

.. .. Fonctionnalités,

, Terrain de recherche -trois cas de cyberadministration

, Hypothèse émergeant de nos cas de cyberadministration -Les situations normales et extrêmes de gestion

P. Du-problème-de-recherche and .. .. ,

.. .. Chapitre-7--méthodologie,

, Méthodes de conception et d'évaluation de l'artefact

, Chapitre 8 -Description de l'artefact

. .. Exigences-fonctionnelles,

, Release 1 -Questionnaires d'évaluation de l'efficacité

. .. Back-end,

, Évaluation de l'approche de DSR adoptée dans la thèse

.. .. Si,

. .. Si,

, Chapitre 11 -Conclusion de la seconde partie

. .. Conclusion-globale,

. .. Références-bibliographiques,

, END

, Table: Evaluation , Colonne: ajUser , mpdr.constraint.mess.err.datatype.word , Les espaces ne sont pas autorisés pour une données de type, IF INSTR(pio_crtrec.ajUser, ' ' ) > 0 THEN raise_application_error, 20001.

, END

, Table: Evaluation , Colonne: moUser , mpdr.constraint.mess.err.datatype.string , Les caractères de contrôle ne sont pas autorisés pour une données de type, 20001.

, END

, Table: Evaluation , Colonne: moUser , mpdr.constraint.mess.err.datatype.token , Deux espaces contigus ou plus ne sont pas autorisés pour une données de type, IF INSTR( pio_crtrec.moUser, ' ' ) > 0 THEN raise_application_error, 20001.

, END

, Table: Evaluation , Colonne: moUser , mpdr.constraint.mess.err.datatype.word , Les espaces ne sont pas autorisés pour une données de type, IF INSTR(pio_crtrec.moUser, ' ' ) > 0 THEN raise_application_error, 20001.

, END

, PROCEDURE column_PEA(pio_crtrec IN OUT Evaluation%ROWTYPE) IS BEGIN NULL

, PROCEDURE frozen_column( pio_newrec IN OUT Evaluation%ROWTYPE, pio_oldrec IN OUT Evaluation%ROWTYPE) IS BEGIN NULL