. Pour, OED accorde une entrée séparée au sens figuré suivant : « to overtake, befall, happen to. Phr. what has come over (a person) ? why is (a person) behaving in an unusual way? » 524 . Ce sens s'est développé plus tard et était le plus souvent employé sous la forme interrogative. Le premier exemple présenté, p.390

S. Cependant and . Le-plan-sémantique, ce sens ne diffère pas du sens vu pour la première fois en 519 OED. 520 Ibid. 521 Exemple tiré de Shakepeare, Henry V, 1599 : I, p.557

A. , J. Hubert, D. René, and T. Et-john, Meaning potentials and context: some consequences for the analysis of variation in meaning, Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics. éds. CUYCKENS, pp.29-66, 2003.

A. , J. Thomas, W. Anthony, L. Et-ryan, and G. , Heaviness vs. Newness: the effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering, Language, vol.36, issue.1, pp.28-55, 2000.

B. , L. É. Lehrer, A. Eva, and K. , Frames, concepts and conceptual fields Frames, Fields and Contrasts, pp.21-74, 1992.

L. Barsalou, Perceptual symbol systems, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.22, issue.04, pp.577-609, 1999.
DOI : 10.1017/S0140525X99002149

O. Behagel, Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern [relations between magnitude and sequencing of sentential elements, Indogermanische Froschungen, vol.25, pp.110-142, 1909.

O. Behagel, Von Deutscher Wortstellung 44 Unterricht : Zeitschrift Für Deutschen, 1930.

R. Binnick, Ambiguity and vagueness Chicago Linguistics Society papers from the 6 th Regional Meeting, pp.147-153, 1970.

H. Boas, On constructional polysemy and verbal polysemy in Construction Grammar, Proceedings of the 2000 Western Conference on Linguistics 12. éd. Vida SAMIIAN, pp.126-139, 2002.

B. and D. Generality, Gradience and the All-or-None. The Hague : Mouton de Gruyter, 1961.

D. Bolinger, The Phrasal Verb in English, 1971.

M. Breal, Essai de sémantique

L. Brinton and T. Elizabeth, Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge, 2005.

L. Brinton, The Development of English Aspectual Systems, 1988.

B. Claudia, The Story of Over Mémoire M.A.. University of California, 1981.

C. Brugman, The Story of Over : Polysemy, Semantics and the Structure of the Lexicon, 1988.

M. Butt, G. Wilhelm, and . Éds, Projection of Arguments: lexical and Compositional Factors, 1998.

C. , B. D. Nicole, J. Ray, A. Mcintyre, U. Et-silke et al., And up it rises: Particle preposing in English Verb-Particle Explorations, pp.43-66, 2002.

C. , B. É. Cuyckens, . Hubert, D. Walter, . Mulder et al., The particularity of particles, or why they are not just 'intransitive prepositions Adpositions of Movement, pp.29-57, 2004.

C. and W. Discourse, Consciousness and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing, 1994.

C. , S. Melissa, and B. , Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: the influence of language specific lexicalization patterns, pp.83-122, 1992.

C. , N. Howard, L. Joachim, and . Jacobs, The Theory of Principles and Parameters Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research 1 The Minimalist Program, 1993.

C. , M. Jeremy, and W. , Visual Attention Blackwell Handbook of Perception, pp.272-310, 2001.

C. , H. Et-eve, and C. , Psychology and Language. An Introduction to Psycholinguistics, 1977.

C. , N. Henk, V. Koster, V. R. Henk, and . Berlin, Semi-lexical categories Semi-lexical Categories: The function of content words and the content of function words, éds. CORVER, Norbert, 2001.

C. , W. É. Butt, M. Wilhelm, and G. , Event Structure and Argument Linking Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, pp.21-63, 1998.

W. Croft, Linguistic evidence and mental representations, Cognitive Linguistics, vol.9, issue.2, pp.151-174, 1998.
DOI : 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.2.151

W. Croft, Explaining Language Change : An Evolutionary Approach, 2000.

W. Croft, Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective, 2001.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001

C. , W. Et-alan, and C. , Cognitive Linguistics, 2004.

W. Croft, On explaining metonymy: Comment on Peirsman and Geeraerts, ???Metonymy as a prototypical category???, Cognitive Linguistics, vol.17, issue.3, pp.317-326, 2006.
DOI : 10.1515/COG.2006.008

C. , H. Britta, and Z. Britta, Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected papers from the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 1997.

D. , N. Ray, J. , A. Mcintyre, U. Silke et al., Verb- Particle explorations, 2002.

D. Dikken and M. , Particles: On the Syntax of Verb-Particle, Traidic and Causative Constructions, 1995.

R. Dirven, Spatial relations in English Anglistik & englischunterricht 14, pp.103-132, 1981.

R. Dirven, Dividing up physical and mental space into conceptual categories by means of English prepositions The Semantics of Prepositions. éd. ZELINSKY-WIBBELT, Cornelia, pp.73-97, 1993.

R. Dirven, The metaphoric in recent Cognitive Approaches to English Phrasal verbs, pp.39-54, 2001.

G. Dunbar, Towards a cognitive analysis of polysemy, ambiguity, and vagueness, Cognitive Linguistics, vol.12, issue.1, pp.1-14, 2001.
DOI : 10.1515/cogl.12.1.1

K. Eide, Å. Tor, K. Henk, and V. Berlin, Semi-lexical heads in a semantically charged syntax Semi-lexical Categories, pp.455-473, 2001.

E. , L. Verspoor, K. Marjolin, L. Dong, and S. Et-eve, The Mental Manipulation of the Vertical Axis: How to go from " up " to " out " , or from " above " to " behind Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning, pp.69-88, 1997.

M. Emenean, Studies in Vietnamese (Annamese) Grammar, 1951.

E. Vyvyan, E. Vyvyan, and C. Paul, Lexical concepts, cognitive models approach to spatial semantics: The 'state' sense of English prepositions Language, Cognition and Space, 2006.

V. Evans, Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning-construction, Cognitive Linguistics, vol.17, issue.4, pp.491-534, 2006.
DOI : 10.1515/COG.2006.016
URL : http://eprints.brighton.ac.uk/2468/1/COG.2006.pdf

E. , V. Melanie, and G. , Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction, 2006.

V. Evans, T. Andrea, . Cuyckens, . Hubert, D. Walter et al., Rethinking English 'prepositions of movement': The Case of to and through Adpositions of Movement, 2004.

V. Evans and T. Andrea, Spatial experience, lexical structure and motivation: The case of in, Studies in Linguistic Motivation. éds. RADDEN, Günter, et Klaus- Uwe PANTHER, pp.157-192, 2004.

J. Feldman and N. Srinivas, Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language, Brain and Language, vol.89, issue.2, pp.385-392, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00355-9

I. Ferrando, A cognitive-semantic analysis of the English lexical unit in, C.I.F, vol.17, pp.189-220, 2000.

C. Fillmore, Frame semantics Linguistics in the Morning Calm. The Linguistic Society of Korea, pp.111-137, 1982.

C. Fillmore, The Mechanisms of ???Construction Grammar???, Proceedings of the 14 th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.95-107, 1988.
DOI : 10.3765/bls.v14i0.1794

J. Fillmore, Frames and the Semantics of Understanding, Quaderni di Semantica, vol.62, pp.222-254, 1985.

K. Fischer, From cognitive semantics to lexical pragmatics the functional polysemy of discourse particles, 2000.

G. , D. Stefan, G. Peter, and B. , The Structure of Lexical Variation, Meaning, Naming, and Context, 1994.

R. Gibbs, The Poetics of Mind, 1994.

G. Raymond, Embodiment and Cognitive Science, 2006.

T. Givon, The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions Linguistics 30, pp.5-55, 1992.

A. Goldberg, Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure, 1995.

A. Goldberg, The Relationships between Verbs and Constructions Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning. éds. VERSPOOR, Marjolijn, Lee Dong LEE et Eve SWEETSER, pp.183-398, 1997.

A. Goldberg, The Emergence of Argument Structure Semantics The Emergence of Language. éd. MacWHINNEY, pp.197-212, 1999.

A. Goldberg, Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language, 2006.

G. , S. É. Dehe, . Nicole, J. Ray, A. Mcintyre et al., The influence of processing on syntactic variation: Particle placement in English Verb-Particle explorations, pp.269-288, 2002.

G. , S. É. Gries, . Stephan, and S. Anatol, The many senses of run Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics, 2005.

J. Haiman, Dictionaries and encyclopedias, Lingua, vol.50, issue.4, pp.329-357, 1980.
DOI : 10.1016/0024-3841(80)90089-3

M. Halliday, Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2, Journal of Linguistics, vol.41, issue.02, pp.199-244, 1967.
DOI : 10.1017/S0022226700016613

B. Hampe, When down is not bad, and up not good enough: A usage-based assessment of the plus???minus parameter in image-schema theory, Cognitive Linguistics, vol.16, issue.1, pp.81-112, 2005.
DOI : 10.1515/cogl.2005.16.1.81

H. , B. Joseph, and G. , From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, 2005.

H. , H. Rolf, N. Et-kiyomi, and K. , Mixed nominalisations, short verb movment and object shift in English, Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society 28. éds. TAMANJI, Pius, pp.143-157, 1998.

B. Hawkins, The Semantics of English Spatial Prepositions, Thèse, 1984.

J. Hawkins, A performance theory of order and constituency, 1994.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511554285

B. Heine, Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalisation, 1993.

B. Heine, Cognitive foundations of grammar, 1997.

H. , B. Ulrike, C. Et-friederike, and H. , Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework, 1991.

A. Herskovits, Spatial expressions and the plasticity of meaning Topics in Cognitive Linguistics. éd. RUDZKA-OSTYN, Brygida, pp.271-297, 1988.

P. Hopper and T. Sandra, The discourse basis for lexical categories in Universal Grammar " Language 60, pp.703-752, 1984.

T. Hoekstra, Small clause results, Lingua, vol.74, issue.2-3, pp.101-139, 1988.
DOI : 10.1016/0024-3841(88)90056-3
URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(88)90056-3

R. Huddleston and P. Geoffrey, The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Zeitschrift f??r Anglistik und Amerikanistik, vol.53, issue.2, 2002.
DOI : 10.1515/zaa-2005-0209

J. , R. N. Stephen, and K. Paul, The basic rules for prepositional phrases Festschrift for Morris Halle, pp.345-356, 1973.

J. , R. É. Dehe, . Nicole, J. Ray, A. Mcintyre et al., English particle constructions, the lexicon, and the autonomy of syntax Verb-Particle explorations, pp.67-94, 2002.

W. Jacobsen, Noun and Verb in Nootka The Victoria conference on Northwestern Languages. éd. EFRAT, Barbara. Victoria, British Columbia Provincial Museum, pp.83-153, 1979.

J. Katz, Recent issues in semantic theory Foundations of Language 3, pp.124-194, 1967.

J. Katz and F. Jeremy, The Structure of a Semantic Theory Language 39, pp.170-210, 1963.

K. , P. Charles, and F. , Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the What's X doing Y? Construction Language 75, pp.1-33, 1999.

K. , R. É. Gueron, J. Hans-georg, O. Jean-yves, and P. , Principles of particle constructions Grammatical Representations, pp.101-140, 1985.

K. Georges, La sémantique du prototype Catégories et sens lexical, 1990.

S. Kosslyn, Image and Mind, Poetics Today, vol.3, issue.1, 1980.
DOI : 10.2307/1772225

K. Stephen, Ghosts in the mind's machine, 1983.

G. Kristiansen, A. Michel, D. René, R. Francisco, and . De-mendoza-ibanez, Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives, 2006.

L. , W. B. , C. Robert, S. Washington, and D. C. , The Boundaries of Words and their Meanings New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, pp.340-373, 1973.

L. and G. Women, Fire and Dangerous things: What Categories reveal about the mind, 1987.

L. , G. Mark, and J. , Metaphors We Live By, 1980.

L. , G. Mark, and J. , Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought, 1999.

L. , G. Mark, and J. , Why cognitive linguistics requires embodied realism, Cognitive Linguistics, vol.13, issue.3, pp.245-263, 2002.
DOI : 10.1515/cogl.2002.016

R. Larson, On the double object construction, Linguistic Inquiry, vol.19, pp.335-391, 1988.

L. , B. Malka, R. Havov, and . Unaccusativity, At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface, 1995.

S. Levinson, L. Stephen, and P. Eric, From outer to inner space: linguistic categories and non-linguistic thinking, Language and Conceptualization. éds. NUYTS, pp.13-45, 1997.

S. Levinson, Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity, 2003.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511613609

B. Liles, A Basic Grammar of Modern English, 1987.

L. Seth, English Prepositions Explained, 1997.

J. Lyons, Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics, 1968.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781139165570

J. Lyons, Semantics: volume II. Cambridge, 1977.

M. , A. Timothy, and S. , Papers in Syntax, MIT working papers in Linguistics 4, 1982.

A. D. Mcintyre, . Nicole, J. Ray, A. Mcintyre, U. Silke et al., Idiosyncracy in particle verbs Verb-Particle explorations, pp.95-118, 2002.

A. Mcintyre, Particle Verbs and Argument Structure, Language and Linguistics Compass, vol.188, issue.4, pp.350-367, 2007.
DOI : 10.1093/jos/14.2.95

A. Mcmicheal, The A???s and BE???s of English Prepositions, Syntax and Semantics of Prepositions. éd. SAINT-DIZIER, pp.43-56, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/1-4020-3873-9_3

N. , B. Todd, Z. Herman, V. David, and C. , Polysemy: Flexible Patterns of Meaning in Mind and Language, 2003.

N. , F. É. Dehe, . Nicole, J. Ray, A. Mcintyre et al., Extended VP-shells and the verb-particle constructions " . Verb- Particle explorations, pp.165-190, 2002.

O. and S. L. Ewald, Partikelverben im Deutsch-Englischen Vergleich " . Deutsch ? typologisch, pp.261-288, 1996.

J. Ouhalla, Functional Categories and Parametric Variation London : Routledge, 1991.
DOI : 10.4324/9780203412015

P. , J. Branimir, and B. , Lexical semantics: The Problem of Polysemy, 1996.

P. , M. René, and D. , The construal of space in language and thought, 1996.

N. Quayle, UP et le verbe à particule en anglais contemporain, Lille : Presses Universitaires de Lille, 1994.

R. Hovav, . Malka, L. É. Beth, . Butt, . Miriam et al., Building Verb Meanings Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, pp.97-134, 1998.

R. , Y. Claudia, and L. Claudia, Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches, 2000.

R. , E. R. Eleanor, and L. Barbara, Principles of categorization Principles of categorisation, in cognition and categorisation, pp.27-48, 1978.

R. , E. Carolyn, and M. , Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories, Cognitive Psychology, vol.7, pp.573-605, 1975.

R. , E. É. Warren, and . Neil, Human categorization Studies in Crosslinguistic Psychology, pp.1-49, 1977.

R. , E. Carolyn, M. Wayne, G. David, J. Penny et al., Basic objects in natural categories, Cognitive Psychology, vol.8, pp.382-439, 1976.

R. Brygida, Prototypes, schemas, and cross-category correspondences: the case of ask, Linguistics, vol.27, pp.613-661, 1989.

R. Brygida, Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, pp.271-298, 1995.

J. Sadock, Autolexical Syntax, pp.379-439, 1985.
DOI : 10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/02026-5

S. , D. Sally, and R. , Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind -the linguist's or the language user's?, Cognitive Linguistics, vol.61, pp.89-130, 1995.

F. Saussure and . De, Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot, 1ère édition, pp.2-1964, 1916.

S. , R. H. Werner, and S. Rainer, A short story of down Understanding the Lexicon: Meaning, Sense and World Knowledge in Lexical Semantics, 1988.

M. Shibatani, T. Sandra, and . Éds, Grammatical Constructions: Form and Meaning, 1996.

A. Sorace, Gradients in Auxiliary Selection with Intransitive Verbs Language 76, pp.859-890, 2000.

D. Sperber and W. Deirdre, Relevance: Cognition and Communication. Oxford : Blackwell, 1ère édition, pp.2-1995, 1986.

K. Sroka, The syntax of English phrasal verbs. The Hague, 1972.

B. Strang, Modern English Structure, 1962.

K. Stunell, The Semantics of English Phrasal Verbs. M.A. dissertation, 2007.

P. Svenonious, The Optionality of Particle Shift Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 57, pp.47-75, 1996.

S. Svorou, The grammar of space, 1993.
DOI : 10.1075/tsl.25

H. Sweet, A New English Grammar ? Logical and Historial, Part 1, 1891.

E. Sweetser, From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure, 1990.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511620904

E. Traugott, On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change, Language, vol.65, issue.1, pp.31-55, 1989.
DOI : 10.2307/414841

T. , E. Et, K. Ekkehard, T. , E. Bernd et al., The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited Approaches to Grammaticalization, pp.189-218, 1991.

T. , A. Vyvyan, and E. , The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning, and Cognition, 2007.

T. , A. Vyvyan, and E. , Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: the case of over, pp.724-765, 2001.

T. , A. Vyvyan, and E. , Spatial scenes: A cognitive approach to prepositions and the experiential basis of meaning, 2002.

V. Dongen and W. A. Sr, He put on his hat and He put his hat on, Neophilologus, vol.4, issue.1, pp.322-353, 1919.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01508864

. Van-der-gucht, . Fieke, W. Klaas, D. Et-ludovic, and . Cuypere, The iconicity of embodied meaning. Polysemy of spatial prepositions in the cognitive framework, Language Sciences, vol.29, issue.6, pp.733-75, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.langsci.2006.12.027

C. Vandeloise, Representation, prototypes and centrality Meanings and prototypes: Studies in linguistic categorization. éd. TSOHATZIDIS, Savas, pp.403-437, 1990.

C. Vandeloise, Methodology and analyses of the preposition in, Cognitive Linguistics, vol.52, pp.157-184, 1994.

C. Vandeloise, Spatial Prepositions: A Case Study from French (traduit par Anna BOSCH), 1991.

V. Valin and R. , Exploring the syntax-semantics interface, 2005.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511610578

F. Varela, E. Thompson, and R. Eleanor, The embodied mind, 1991.

. Villavicencio-aline, Verb-particle constructions in the world wide web Computational Linguistics Dimensions of Syntax and Semantics of Prepositions. éd. SAINT-DIZIER, 2006.

W. , J. Mabel, and R. , The acquisition of Verb-Particle Constructions " Paper delivered at the American Speech-Language-Hearing association, 1988.

L. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations New York : Macmillan, 1ère édition 1953, édition consultée, 1973.

L. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets Information and Control 8, pp.338-353, 1965.

J. Zeller, Particle verbs, local domains, and a theory of lexical licensing. Doctoral dissertation, 1999.

Z. , J. Koster, V. Henk, and . Berlin, Lexical particles, semi-lexical postpositions " Semi-lexical Categories, pp.505-549, 2001.

Z. , J. Dehe, . Nicole, J. Ray, A. Mcintyre et al., Particle verbs are heads and phrases " Verb-Particle explorations, pp.233-267, 2002.

R. Zwaan, The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension The Psychology of learning and Motivation 44, pp.35-62, 2004.

Z. , A. Jerrold, and S. , Ambiguity tests and how to fail them, Syntax and Semantics, vol.4, pp.1-36, 1975.

C. , A. Ronald, and M. , Oxford Dictionary of Phrasal Verbs, 1993.

L. , G. Paul, R. Andrew, and W. , Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English website, Disponible sur, 2009.

M. Mccarthy-morrogh, Cambridge Phrasal Verbs Dictionary, 2006.

R. Spears, Mcgraw-hill's Essential Phrasal Verbs Dictionary, 2008.

D. Summers, Longman Phrasal Verbs Dictionary, 2000.

L. , J. Mccartney, and P. , With a Little Help from My Friends " Sergeant Pepper's Lonely Heart's Club Band, 1967.

J. Lennon, Starting over " Double Fantasy, 1980.

S. and W. K. Lear, Acte III, scène vi, 1605, p.30

W. Shakespeare, As you Like It. Acte II, scène vii, 1623, pp.139-166

. Portée-nucléaire, 370 argument prépositionnel, 11, 14 préposition grammaticalisante, pp.122-226