Legal Interpretation in 18th Century Europe: Doctrinal Debates Versus Political Change - HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Chapitre d'ouvrage Année : 2011

Legal Interpretation in 18th Century Europe: Doctrinal Debates Versus Political Change

Résumé

The historical debates about legal interpretation are, simultaneously, products of the longue durée from as far back as Roman origins, and the outcomes of more recent contexts. From this perspective, the period between the end of the 17th century – with the works of Hobbes, De Luca and Domat – and the beginning of the 19th century – with the trends disseminated by Zachariae and Thibaut in Germany – was an era of intensive thinking about judicial power and hermeneutic methods. While Montesquieu, Blackstone or Beccaria proposed their solutions to these problems, the development of the modern State, alongside the revolutionary process in France and the greater part of Europe made the 18th century a turning point in the relations between law and those interpreting it.

Domaines

Droit
Loading...
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

halshs-03281489, version 1 (08-07-2021)

Identifiants

Citer

Jean-Louis Halpérin. Legal Interpretation in 18th Century Europe: Doctrinal Debates Versus Political Change. Yasutomo Morigiwa; Michael Stolleis; Jean-Louis Halpérin. Interpretation of Law in the Age of Enlightenment, Springer, pp.181-187, 2011, 978-94-007-1505-9. ⟨10.1007/978-94-007-1506-6_10⟩. ⟨halshs-03281489⟩
9 Consultations
0 Téléchargements
Dernière date de mise à jour le 07/04/2024
comment ces indicateurs sont-ils produits

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Plus