Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

A Critical Method for the Evaluation of Evidence: François Gorphe’s (1889-1959) Contribution to a Science of Proof à la française

Abstract : Available online: https://revistes.udg.edu/quaestio-facti/article/download/22389/26239

In his 1924 book La critique du témoignage, the French judge François Gorphe (1889-1959) advocated the need that evaluation of evidence be based on the best scientific knowledge available. Drawing upon an extensive knowledge of the experiments conducted by contemporary forensic psychologists, Gorphe urged judges to consider forensic psychology when interrogating witnesses and, ultimately, when evaluating evidence. Gorphe imposed himself as one of the main promoters of a science of proof in France. This paper examines Gorphe’s contributions and the audience they received among forensic psychologists and criminologists in France and abroad. Despite their originality and anchoring in international scientific discussions, Gorphe’s views have not encouraged the creation of an academic domain interested in evidential reasoning in French law faculties. The paper concludes with an examination of the reasons for the limited posterity of Gorphe’s approach.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03108463
Contributor : Olivier Leclerc <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, January 13, 2021 - 11:08:11 AM
Last modification on : Thursday, January 14, 2021 - 3:19:44 AM

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Olivier Leclerc. A Critical Method for the Evaluation of Evidence: François Gorphe’s (1889-1959) Contribution to a Science of Proof à la française. Quaestio facti. International Journal on Evidential Legal Reasoning, Marcial Pons, 2021, 2, pp.11-34. ⟨10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22389⟩. ⟨halshs-03108463⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

213