Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Cassirer et Panofsky : un malentendu philosophique

Abstract : This paper argues that German art historian and iconologist Erwin Panofsky unintentionally misused the concept of "symbolic form" coined by his friend and colleague, philosopher Ernst Cassirer. Although both shared the same neo-Kantian background, I contend that Panofsky clung to Kant’s dualistic theory of knowledge, while Cassirer explicitly adopted a non-dualistic way of thinking largely inspired by Goethean morphology. That is why Panofsky could distinguish between the "natural" space of perception and the cultural space of artistic representation, when Cassirer refused such a possibility. In so doing, Panofsky proved that he totally missed Cassirer’s point: according to the philosopher of symbolic forms, there is no such thing as a "nature," unless this "nature" is grasped as inherently cultural and historical.
Complete list of metadatas

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03104670
Contributor : Rémi Mermet <>
Submitted on : Saturday, January 9, 2021 - 4:01:09 PM
Last modification on : Sunday, January 10, 2021 - 3:25:01 AM

Licence


Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links full text

Identifiers

Citation

Rémi Mermet. Cassirer et Panofsky : un malentendu philosophique. Labyrinth, an international Journal for philosophy, Wien Kultur, 2020, Philosophy, Art(theory), and Literature: Part I, 22 (1), ⟨10.25180/lj.v22i1.217⟩. ⟨halshs-03104670⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

14


Données de recherche

doi: web.