Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Missing Antecedents Found

Abstract : Numerous papers have used so-called 'missing antecedent phenomena' as a criterion for distinguishing deep and surface anaphora. Specifically, only the latter are claimed to licence pronouns with missing antecedents. These papers also argue that missing antecedent phenomena provide evidence that surface anaphora involve unpronounced syntactic structure in the ellipsis site. The present paper suggests that the acceptability judgments on which the argument is based exhibit a confound because they do not take discourse conditions on VPE (a surface anaphor) and VPA (a deep anaphor) into account. Two acceptability experiments provide evidence that what is relevant to the judgments are the discourse conditions and not the presence of deep vs. surface anaphors, casting doubt on the reliability of missing antecedent phenomena as a criterion for deep vs. surface status.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03100870
Contributor : Barbara Hemforth Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Friday, April 15, 2022 - 2:14:21 PM
Last modification on : Friday, August 5, 2022 - 12:00:18 PM

File

Missing.ProcLingSocAmer.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Citation

Philip Harold Miller, Barbara Hemforth, Pascal Amsili, Gabriel Flambard. Missing Antecedents Found. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, Linguistic Society of America, 2020, 5 (1), pp.822-834. ⟨10.3765/plsa.v5i1.4795⟩. ⟨halshs-03100870⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

46

Files downloads

12