. Ericsson-v-d-link, , p.1232, 2014.

K. Kondo, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), Australia, Wind Engineers, JAWE, vol.1991, issue.46, pp.43-47, 1991.

R. P. See, ;. Merges, and . Ménière, The Eco-Patent Commons: Patent Pools, Clearing Houses, and Open Innovation, See WIPO, Patent Pools and Antitrust -A Comparative Analysis, p.123

. Microsoft-v-motorola, SQuAD v2.0 Tokens Generated with WL, WL 2111217 (W.D. Wash. 2013), aff'd, 696 F. 3d 872 (9th Cir. 2015)

U. Schwemmer, Regionalanästhesie: traditio et innovatio, Der Anaesthesist, vol.66, issue.12, pp.901-903, 2017.

U. Schwemmer, Regionalanästhesie: traditio et innovatio, Der Anaesthesist, vol.66, issue.12, pp.901-903, 2017.

T. Heberden, Intellectual Property Valuation and Royalty Determination, International Licensing and Technology Transfer: Practice and the Law, 2011.

A. Micheau and D. Hoa, Heart (pictures), pp.1384-85, 2008.

, Slip Opinion: Merck KGaA v. Integra LifeSciences I, Ltd., et al., Biotechnology Law Report, vol.24, issue.5, pp.651-658, 2005.

, Lucent Technologies, Metal Finishing, vol.97, issue.6, p.56, 1999.

E. D. Va, 764 F. Supp. 2d, vol.807, 2011.

M. I. Sanders, Joint Ventures Involving Tax-Exempt Organizations, re Innovatio IP Ventures, vol.5593609, 2013.

D. High-court, RAMSAY v LM ERICSSON PTY LTD, Victorian Reports, vol.[1989] VR, pp.383-385, 1989.

D. V. High-court-;-ltd and . Sidak, FRAND in India: The Delhi High Court's emerging jurisprudence on royalties for standard-essential patents, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Intex Techs (India), p.10, 2015.

J. Court, "Apple v. Samsung", IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, vol.46, issue.1, pp.116-123, 2015.

G. High-court, Yue Gaofa Minsan Zhougzi Nos 305 and 306, 2013.

S. Scotchmer, Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.5, issue.1, pp.29-41, 1991.

C. Shapiro, Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting, Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol.1, pp.119-150, 2000.

M. Lemley and C. Shapiro, Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking, p.85, 2016.

L. Texas and . Rev, Failed Constitution of Texas (1833), Rio Grande ? Texas, pp.167-178, 2008.

V. J. Farrell, Standard-setting, Patents and Hold-up, Antitrust Law Journal, vol.603, p.74, 2007.

T. De-meese, European Commission Accepts Commitments from Rambus in 'Patent Ambush' Case, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, vol.1, issue.3, pp.215-217, 2010.

. Broadcom-v-qualcomm, Broadcom guns for Qualcomm, III-Vs Review, vol.18, issue.5, p.9, 2005.

. Microsoft-v-motorola, WL 2111217 (W.D. Wash. 2013), aff'd, 696 F. 3d 872 (9th Cir, 2013.

. Ericsson-v-d-link, , p.1232, 2014.

. L. Huawei-;-bus, D. See, and . Bosco, Un cocktail explosif: abus de position dominante, action en contrefaçon, brevet essentiel à une norme et licence FRAND, 2015.

L. Idot, 5.4. Balance internationale des paiements pour les licences de brevet au Japon, au total et pour chaque groupe, exercice 2002, Europe

A. , Contrefaçon de brevets essentiels à une norme: les conditions de l'abus de dominante précisées, JCP E, 1454.

J. Passa, Action en contrefaçon concomitante à la négociation d'une licence FRAND sur un brevet essentiel à une norme: condition de l'abus de position dominante, Propr. indutr, vol.20, 2015.

. Olg-düsseldorf, Sisvel v Haier, case no I-15 U 66/15, 2017.

S. Lg-düsseldorf and . Lawrence-v-vodafone, LG Düsseldorf: Wettbewerbsverstoß durch fehlenden Hinweis auf Nutzungseinschränkungen in der Werbung für Vodafone Pass, Computer und Recht, vol.36, issue.9, p.625, 2020.

L. G. Düsseldorf, Beweislastverteilung für den Anspruch auf Kündigungsvergütung, JurPC, pp.7-7, 2016.

. Tgi-paris and . Order, ?Samsung v. Apple?, IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, vol.48, issue.4, pp.486-487, 2017.

T. C. Marseilles and . Wiko-v-sisvel, , 2016.

U. Planet-v-huawei, EWHC, vol.711, 2017.

. Olg-düsseldorf, Sisvel v Haier, case no I-15 U 66/15, 2017.

. Olg-düsseldorf, Unwired Planet v Huawei, case no I-2 U 31/16, 2016.

;. Tgi-paris and . Paris, Verification, Model Checking, and Abstract Interpretation, conf. CA Paris, vol.17, 2017.

P. Ca, Dinner Speech, Mark Twain Speaking, pp.122-124

. Ca-paris and . Orders, BGH, Urteil v. 26. 10. 2018 ? V ZR 143/17 (LG Augsburg)., JuristenZeitung, vol.74, issue.17, p.840, 2019.

C. Izambert, La régularité du séjour des étrangers en France : frontière du projet d?universalisation de la protection sociale ?, Revue française des affaires sociales, vol.1, issue.4, p.17, 2018.

J. See and . Passa, Entreprises brevetantes ayant passé un contrat de licence pour au moins un brevet avec une société non affiliée, 2006, Propr. industr, vol.20, 2010.

L. G. Düsseldorf, "LTE Zuhause", JurPC, pp.7-7, 2015.

P. Van-ginneken and G. Béquet, Huawei/ZTE, een nieuwe standaard in FRAND-zaken?, Markt en Mededinging, vol.35, issue.4, pp.155-159, 2015.

. Lg-düsseldorf and . Ventures, LG Düsseldorf: Wettbewerbsverstoß durch fehlenden Hinweis auf Nutzungseinschränkungen in der Werbung für Vodafone Pass, Computer und Recht, vol.36, issue.9, p.625, 2020.

T. Takigawa, Standard-Essential Patents and the Japanese Competition Law in Comparison with China, the U.S., and the EU, The Antitrust Bulletin, vol.62, issue.3, pp.483-493, 2017.

K. T. Kim, J. S. Kim, J. Park, J. Lee, Y. W. Jo et al., Swelling of Commercial Matrix Tablets Based on Carboxymethyl Cellulose Sodium and Alginic Acid, Yakhak Hoeji, vol.60, issue.2, pp.73-77, 2016.

A. Emch, Guangdong?s New Development Strategy, The Development of Guangdong, pp.85-118, 2018.

T. J. Sherliker, A serious feat?an engaging look at trade mark transactions worldwide, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, vol.11, issue.8, pp.641-642, 2016.

. Shapiro, Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting, Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol.1, pp.119-150, 2000.

. Microsoft-v-motorola, WL 2111217 (W.D. Wash. 2013), aff'd, 696 F. 3d 872 (9th Cir, 2013.

. Olg-düsseldorf, Sisvel v Haier, case n°I-15 U 66/15, 2017.

. Lg-düsseldorf, 47. Religiöses Schrifttum im Strafvollzug. LG Marburg, Beschluss vom 7.6.2016 (4a StVK 14/16 u. 16/16), 1.1.2016?30.6.2016, pp.440-445, 2019.

. Lg-düsseldorf and . Ip-ventures-v-vodafone, LG Düsseldorf: Wettbewerbsverstoß durch fehlenden Hinweis auf Nutzungseinschränkungen in der Werbung für Vodafone Pass, Computer und Recht, vol.36, issue.9, p.625, 2020.

L. G. Düsseldorf, "LTE Zuhause", JurPC, pp.7-7, 2015.

M. I. Sanders, Joint Ventures Involving Tax-Exempt Organizations, re Innovatio IP Ventures, vol.5593609, 2013.

. Lg-düsseldorf, Unwired Planet v Samsung, case n°4b O 120/14 and, 2016.

R. H. See and . Stern, What Are Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory Terms for Licensing A Standard-Essential Patent?, 2014.

K. Kondo, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), Australia, Wind Engineers, JAWE, vol.1991, issue.46, pp.43-47, 1991.

, TCL Communications v Ericsson: Memorandum of Findings of fact and Conlusions of Law, 2017.

D. Geradin, A. Layne-farrar, and J. Padilla, Royalty Stacking in High Tech Industries: Separating Myth from Reality, 2007.

A. Galetovic and K. Gupta, Royalty Stacking and Standard Essential Patents: Theory and Evidence from the World Mobile Wireless Industry, SSRN Electronic Journal, p.15012, 2017.

A. Galetovic, S. Haber, L. Zaretzki, J. Armstrong, T. Mueller et al., Is There An Anticommons Tragedy In The World Smartphone Industry?" (2018) 32 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1527. However, see A, 2014.

J. L. Contreras, Standards, Royalty Stackings, and Collective Action, vol.3, 2015.

. Contreras, Standards, Royalty Stackings, and Collective Action, vol.3, 2015.

B. J. Love, Patentee Overcompensation and the Entire Market Value Rule, Stan. L. Rev, vol.263, p.60, 2007.

. Sidak, FRAND in India: The Delhi High Court's emerging jurisprudence on royalties for standard-essential patents, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, vol.10, issue.8, pp.609-618, 2015.

, Chinese National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) v Qualcomm, Decision of, 2015.

A. L. Farrar, The Patent Damages Gap: An Economist's Review of U.S. Statutory Patent Damages Apportionment Rules, SSRN, 2017.

. Ericsson-v-d-link, , p.1232, 2014.

V. J. Sidak, Apportionment, Frand Royalties, and Comparable Licenses After <I>Ericsson V. D-Link</I>, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2016.

, Revista Científica Faesa, U. Ill. L. Rev

G. B?gel, Hewlett-Packard: Hagyomány és megújulás, Competitio, vol.2, issue.1, pp.103-117, 2003.

F. Bourguet and A. Vivès-albertini, Flux internationaux liés à la propriété intellectuelle, d'après les redevances et droits de licence, 2000-10, p.44

M. A. Lemley and C. Shapiro, A Simple Approach to Setting Reasonable Royalties for Standard-Essential Patents" (2013) 28 Berkeley Tech, Law Journal, 1135.

J. L. Contreras, Rethinking RAND: SDO-Based Approaches to Patent Licensing Commitments, ITU Patent Roundtable, p.10, 2012.

J. L. Contreras, Fixed FRAND: A Pseudo-Patent Pool Approach to Standards-Based Patent Licensing, Law Journal, p.79, 1947.

J. L. Contreras, Aggregated Royalties for Top-Down FRAND Determinations, The Antitrust Bulletin, vol.62, issue.4, pp.690-709, 2017.