Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Preprints, Working Papers, ...

Does Vote Trading Improve Welfare?

Abstract : Voters have strong incentives to increase their influence by trading votes, acquiring others' votes when preferences are strong in exchange for giving votes away when preferences are weak. But is vote trading welfare-improving or welfare-decreasing? For a practice long believed to be central to collective decisions, the lack of a clear answer is surprising. We review the theoretical literature and, when available, its related experimental tests. We begin with the analysis of logrolling - the exchange of votes for votes. We then focus on vote markets, where votes can be traded against a numeraire. We conclude with procedures allowing voters to shift votes across decisions - to trade votes with oneself only. We find that vote trading and vote markets are typically inefficient; more encouraging results are obtained by allowing voters to allocate votes across decisions.
Document type :
Preprints, Working Papers, ...
Complete list of metadata

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02922012
Contributor : Antonin Macé <>
Submitted on : Friday, December 18, 2020 - 2:17:18 PM
Last modification on : Friday, July 2, 2021 - 10:44:02 AM

File

WP_202051_2.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Alessandra Casella, Antonin Macé. Does Vote Trading Improve Welfare?. 2020. ⟨halshs-02922012v2⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

117

Files downloads

310