M. Allais, Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque; critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole Americaine, Econometrica, vol.21, pp.503-546, 1953.

M. Allais, The foundations of a positive theory of choice involving risk and a criticism of the postulates and axioms of the American School, Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp.27-145, 1953.

D. Bernheim, The good, the bad, and the ugly: a unified approach to behavioural welfare economics, Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, vol.7, pp.12-68, 2016.

D. Bernheim and A. Rangel, Beyond revealed preference: choicetheoretic foundations for behavioral welfare economics, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.124, pp.51-104, 2009.

, Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne -2020, vol.16

J. Bershears, J. Choi, D. Laibson, and B. Madrian, How are preferences revealed?, Journal of Public Economics, vol.92, pp.1787-1794, 2008.

H. Bleichrodt, J. Pinto-prades, and P. Wakker, Making descriptive use of prospect theory to improve the prescriptive use of expected utility, Management Science, vol.47, pp.1498-1514, 2001.

J. Broome, Royal Institute of Philsophy Supplement, vol.59, pp.183-208, 2006.

J. Broome, Rationality through Reasoning, 2013.

C. Camerer, S. Issacharoff, G. Loewenstein, O. Ted, M. Donaghue et al., Regulation for conservatives: behavioral economics and the case for 'asymmetric paternalism, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol.151, pp.1211-1254, 2003.

R. Cubitt and R. Sugden, On money pumps, Games and Economic Behavior, vol.37, pp.121-160, 2001.

F. Dietrich and C. List, Reason-based choice and context-dependence: An explanatory framework, Economics and Philosophy, vol.32, issue.2, pp.175-229, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01249514

F. Dietrich, A. Staras, and R. Sugden, A Broomean model of rationality and reasoning, Journal of Philosophy, vol.116, issue.11, pp.585-614, 2019.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01904091

I. Gilboa, Questions in decision theory, Annual Review of Economics, vol.2, pp.1-19, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00635595

I. Gilboa and D. Schmeidler, A Theory of Case-Based Decisions, 2001.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00756321

G. Gigerenzer, P. Todd, and T. Group, Simple Heuristics that Make us Smart, 1999.

D. Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, pp.1739-1779, 1978.

G. Infante, G. Lecouteux, and R. Sugden, Preference purification and the inner rational agent: a critique of the conventional wisdom of behavioural welfare economics, Journal of Economic Methodology, vol.23, pp.1-25, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01427046

S. Jallais and P. Pradier, The Allais Paradox and its immediate consequences for expected utility theory, The Experiment in the History of Economics. London: Routledge, pp.21-42, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00311396

, Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne -2020, vol.16

D. Kahneman, A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality, American Psychologist, vol.58, pp.697-720, 2003.

D. Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow, 2011.

D. Kahneman, Comment, 1996.

, The Rational Foundations of Economic Behaviour, pp.251-254

D. Kahneman and C. Sunstein, Cognitive psychology of moral intuitions, Neurobiology of Human Values, pp.91-105, 2006.

D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, vol.47, pp.263-291, 1979.

N. Kolodny, Why be rational? Mind, vol.114, pp.509-563, 2005.

B. K?szegi and M. Rabin, Choices, situations, and happiness, Journal of Public Economics, vol.92, pp.1821-1832, 2008.

D. Lewis, Counterfactuals, 1973.

G. Loomes and R. Sugden, Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty, Economic Journal, vol.92, pp.805-824, 1982.

P. Manzini and M. Mariotti, Welfare economics and bounded rationality: the case for model-based approaches, Journal of Economic Methodology, vol.21, pp.342-360, 2014.

P. Mongin, The Allais Paradox: what it became, what it really was, what it now suggests to us, Forthcoming in Economics and Philosophy, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01933822

I. Moscati, How economists came to accept expected utility theory: the case of Samuelson and Savage, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.30, pp.219-236, 2016.

M. Rabin, Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: a calibration theorem, Econometrica, vol.68, pp.1281-1292, 2000.

Y. Salant and A. Rubinstein, A, f): choice with frames, Review of Economic Studies, vol.75, pp.1287-1296, 2008.

, Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne -2020, vol.16

L. Savage, The Foundations of Statistics, 1954.

P. Slovic and A. Tversky, Who accepts Savage's axiom?, Behavioral Science, vol.19, pp.368-373, 1974.

R. Sugden, Hume's non-instrumental and non-propositional decision theory, Economics and Philosophy, vol.22, pp.365-391, 2006.

R. Thaler, Misbehaving: How Economics Became Behavioural, 2015.

R. Thaler and C. Sunstein, Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness, 2008.

P. Wason and J. Evans, Dual processes in reasoning, Cognition, vol.3, pp.141-154, 1975.

, Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne -2020, vol.16