D. Demolin, TIPA Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage, vol.28, 1992.

A. L. Berez-kroeker, . Gawne, . Lauren, S. Kung, . Smythe et al., Reproducible research in linguistics: a position statement on data citation and attribution in our field, Linguistics, vol.56, issue.1, pp.1-18, 2018.

R. D. Morey, C. D. Chambers, P. J. Etchells, C. R. Harris, R. Hoekstra et al., The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review, Royal Society Open Science [Internet], vol.3, issue.1, 2016.

B. A. Nosek, Center for Open Science: strategic plan, 2017.

M. R. Munafò, B. A. Nosek, D. Bishop, K. S. Button, C. D. Chambers et al., A manifesto for reproducible science, Nature Human Behaviour, vol.1, p.21, 2017.

T. B. Roettger, Researcher degrees of freedom in phonetic research, Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, vol.10, issue.1, 2019.

Z. C. Lipton and J. Steinhardt, Troubling trends in Machine Learning scholarship. acmqueue -Association for Computing Machinery, vol.17, pp.1-33, 2019.

. Joss, , pp.3-16, 2020.

T. B. Roettger, B. Winter, and H. Baayen, Emergent data analysis in phonetic sciences: Towards pluralism and reproducibility, Journal of Phonetics, vol.73, pp.1-7, 2019.

H. A. Piwowar and T. J. Vision, Data reuse and the open data citation advantage, PeerJ, vol.1, p.175, 2013.

E. C. Mckiernan, P. E. Bourne, C. T. Brown, S. Buck, A. Kenall et al., Point of view: How open science helps researchers succeed, Elife, vol.5, p.16800, 2016.

B. L. Houtkoop, C. Chambers, M. Macleod, D. V. Bishop, T. E. Nichols et al., Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, vol.1, issue.1, pp.70-85, 2018.

C. L. Borgman, Big data, little data, no data: scholarship in the networked world, 2015.

J. P. Simmons, L. D. Nelson, and U. Simonsohn, False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant, Psychological Science, vol.22, issue.11, pp.1359-66, 2011.

P. Wagner, J. Trouvain, and F. Zimmerer, In defense of stylistic diversity in speech research, Journal of Phonetics, vol.48, pp.1-12, 2015.

A. Vasile, S. Guillaume, M. Aouini, and A. Michaud, Le Digital Object Identifier, une impérieuse nécessité ? L'exemple de l'attribution de DOI à la Collection Pangloss, archive ouverte de langues en danger. I2D -Information, données & documents, 2020.

B. Nicenboim, T. B. Roettger, and S. Vasishth, Using meta-analysis for evidence synthesis: The case of incomplete neutralization in German, Journal of Phonetics, vol.70, pp.39-55, 2018.

R. Silberzahn, E. L. Uhlmann, D. P. Martin, P. Anselmi, F. Aust et al., Many analysts, one dataset: Making transparent how variations in analytical choices affect results, 2017.

B. Remijsen and O. G. Ayoker, Contrastive tonal alignment in falling contours in Shilluk, Phonology, vol.31, issue.3, pp.435-62, 2014.

J. Barnes, N. Veilleux, A. Brugos, and S. Shattuck-hufnagel, The interaction of timing and scaling in a lexical tone system: an example from Shilluk, Proceedings of ICPhS XIX (19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences), 2019.

J. P. Tennant, H. Crane, T. Crick, J. Davila, A. Enkhbayar et al., Ten hot topics around scholarly publishing, Publications, vol.7, issue.2, pp.1-24, 2019.

, Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science, Science, vol.349, p.4716, 2015.

P. Brugger, From haunted brain to haunted science: A cognitive neuroscience view of paranormal and pseudoscientific thought, Hauntings and poltergeists: Multidisciplinary perspectives, pp.195-213, 2001.

G. Bachelard, La Formation de l'esprit scientifique. Contribution à une psychanalyse de la connaissance objective, 1938.

R. S. Nickerson, Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises, Review of General Psychology, vol.2, issue.2, pp.175-220, 1998.

B. Fischhoff, Hindsight-foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty, 1974.

L. Maurel, Quel statut pour les données de la recherche après la loi numérique ?

S. I. Lex, , 2016.

O. Niebuhr and A. Michaud, Speech data acquisition: the underestimated challenge. KALIPHO -Kieler Arbeiten zur Linguistik und Phonetik, vol.3, pp.1-42, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01026295

. Joss, , pp.3-16, 2020.

O. Niebuhr, J. Michalsky, and . Pascal, DPA: A pilot study on using prosodic competence scores to predict communicative skills for team working and public speaking, Proceedings of Interspeech, pp.306-316, 2019.

E. Snowden, Permanent record. Macmillan, 2019.

C. W. Leach and . Editorial, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2019.

N. Thieberger, A. Margetts, S. Morey, and S. Musgrave, Assessing annotated corpora as research output, Australian Journal of Linguistics, vol.36, issue.1, pp.1-21, 2016.

S. Drude, Reflections on diversity linguistics: Language inventories and atlases, pp.122-153, 1998.

F. Boas, . Tsimshian, and . Washington, Government Printing Office; 1902. 244 p. (Bulletin of the Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology)

T. Woodbury, Language documentation and description. London: School of African and Oriental Studies, pp.35-51, 2003.

A. Baccini, G. De-nicolao, and E. Petrovich, Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: A country-level comparative analysis, PLoS One, vol.14, issue.9, p.221212, 2019.

M. Biagioli, Watch out for cheats in citation game, Nature, vol.535, issue.7611, p.201, 2016.

W. J. Ripple, C. Wolf, T. M. Newsome, M. Galetti, M. Alamgir et al., World scientists' warning to humanity: a second notice, BioScience, vol.67, issue.12, pp.1026-1034, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02921296

M. D. Wilkinson, M. Dumontier, A. Ijj, G. Appleton, M. Axton et al., The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, vol.3, p.160018, 2016.

B. C. Lust, M. Blume, A. Pareja-lora, and C. Chiarcos, Development of Linguistic Linked Open Data resources for collaborative data-intensive research in the language sciences: An introduction, 2019.

B. Hanson, A. Sugden, and B. Alberts, Making data maximally available, Science, vol.331, issue.6018, p.649, 2011.

, Heard melodies are sweet, but those unheard / Are sweeter; therefore, ye soft pipes, play on; / Not to the sensual ear, but, more endear'd / Pipe to the spirit ditties of no tone, UC San Diego Resources for Research Ethics Education, 2020.

, iv Some will be surprised to learn that some countries make it a legal obligation to share research data, French law, a literal reading of the "Digital Republic" law (loi n° 2016-1321 du 7 octobre 2016) is that data produced by public institutions, including research institutions, 2020.