Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics

Abstract : How effective is fact checking in countervailing “alternative facts,” i.e., misleading statements by politicians? In a randomized online experiment during the 2017 French presidential election campaign, we subjected subgroups of 2480 French voters to alternative facts by the extreme-right candidate, Marine Le Pen, and/or corresponding facts about the European refugee crisis from official sources. We find that: (i) alternative facts are highly persuasive; (ii) fact checking improves factual knowledge of voters (iii) but it does not affect policy conclusions or support for the candidate; (iv) exposure to facts alone does not decrease support for the candidate, even though voters update their knowledge. We find evidence consistent with the view that at least part of the effect can be explained by raising salience of the immigration issue.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02491733
Contributor : Caroline Bauer <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, February 26, 2020 - 12:32:23 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, October 14, 2020 - 4:13:26 AM

Links full text

Identifiers

Citation

Oscar Barrera, Sergei Guriev, Emeric Henry, Ekaterina Zhuravskaya. Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics. Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, 2020, 182, pp.104123. ⟨10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104123⟩. ⟨halshs-02491733⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

161