Y. Abdia, K. Kulasekera, S. Datta, M. Boakye, and M. Kong, Propensity Scores Based Methods for Estimating Average Treatment Effect and Average Treatment Effect Among Treated: A Comparative Study, Biometrical Journal, pp.967-985, 2017.

A. Chávez and S. M. , Behavioural additionality in the context of regional innovation policy in Spain. Innovation, vol.13, pp.95-110, 2011.

D. Antonioli, A. Marzucchi, and S. Montresor, Regional innovation policy and innovative behaviour: looking for additional effects, European Planning Studies, vol.22, issue.1, pp.64-83, 2014.

P. Austin and E. Stuart, Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies, Statistics in Medicine, vol.34, pp.3661-79, 2015.

B. Baccaïni, F. Sémécurbe, and G. Thomas, Les déplacements domicile-travail amplifiés par la périurbanisation, 2007.

H. Bang and J. M. Robins, Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models, Biometrics, vol.61, issue.4, pp.962-973, 2005.

C. Bellégo and V. Dortet-bernadet, L'impact de la participation aux pôles de compétitivité sur les PME et les ETI, Économie et Statistique, vol.471, pp.65-83, 2014.

H. Ben-hassine and C. Mathieu, Évaluation de la politique des pôles de compétitivité : la fin d'une malédiction ?, 2017.

M. Bleda and P. Del-rio, The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems, Research policy, vol.42, issue.5, pp.1039-1052, 2013.

K. Blomkvist, P. Kappen, and I. Zander, Superstar inventors-towards a people-centric perspective on the geography of technological renewal in the multinational corporation, Research Policy, vol.43, issue.4, pp.669-682, 2014.

R. Boschma, Proximity and innovation. A critical assessment, Regional Studies, vol.39, issue.1, pp.61-74, 2005.

L. G. Branstetter and M. Sakakibara, When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel data, American Economic Review, vol.92, issue.1, pp.143-159, 2002.

T. Broekel, D. Fornahl, and A. Morrison, Another cluster premium: Innovation subsidies and R&D collaboration networks, Research policy, vol.44, issue.8, pp.1431-1444, 2015.

G. Calignano and R. D. Fitjar, Strengthening relationships in clusters: How effective is an indirect policy measure carried out in a peripheral technology district?, The Annals of Regional Science, vol.59, issue.1, pp.139-169, 2017.

A. Caloffi, F. Rossi, and M. Russo, What makes SMEs more likely to collaborate? Analysing the role of regional innovation policy, European Planning Studies, vol.23, issue.7, pp.1245-1264, 2015.

A. Caloffi, M. Mariani, F. Rossi, and M. Russo, A comparative evaluation of regional subsidies for collaborative and individual R&D in small and medium-sized enterprises, Research Policy, vol.47, issue.8, pp.1437-1447, 2018.

N. Carnegie, M. Harada, and J. Hill, Assessing sensitivity to unmeasured confounding using a simulated potential confounder, Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, vol.9, issue.3, pp.395-420, 2016.

R. H. Coase, The Problem of Social Cost, Journal of Law and Economics, vol.3, pp.1-44, 1960.

M. Coudène and D. Levy, De plus en plus de personnes travaillent en dehors de leur commune de résidence, 2016.

C. Criscuolo and J. Haskel, Innovation and Productivity Growth in the UK: Evidence from CIS2 and CIS3, Working paper, 2003.

C. D'aspremont and A. Jacquemin, Cooperative and Non-cooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers, American Economic Review, vol.78, issue.5, pp.1133-1137, 1988.

I. De-noni, A. Ganzaroli, and L. Orsi, The impact of intra-and inter-regional knowledge collaboration and technological variety on the knowledge productivity of European regions, Technological Forecast. Social. Change, vol.117, pp.108-118, 2017.

R. H. Dehejia and S. Wahba, Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.94, pp.1053-1062, 1999.

, Directorate General for Enterprise -DGE, Competitiveness clusters. Etudes et statistiques, 4 pages, p.67, 2017.

G. Duranton, California Dreamin': The Feeble Case for Cluster Policies, Review of Economic Analysis, vol.3, pp.3-45, 2011.

, European observatory for cluster and industrial change, Cluster programmes in Europe and beyond, p.146, 2019.

. European-patent-office, , 2011.

M. G. Everett and T. W. Valente, Bridging, brokerage and betweenness, Social networks, vol.44, pp.202-208, 2016.

O. Falck, S. Heblich, and S. Kipar, Industrial Innovation: Direct evidence From a Cluster-Oriented Policy, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol.40, issue.6, pp.574-582, 2010.

L. Fontagné, P. Koenig, F. Mayneris, and S. Pocet, Cluster policies and firm selection: Evidence from France, Journal of Regional Science, vol.53, issue.5, pp.897-922, 2013.

C. Freeman, Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan, 1987.

E. Giuliani, A. Matta, C. Pietrobelli, and R. Stucchi, The Impact Evaluation of Cluster Development Programs: Methods and Practices. Inter-American Development Bank, pp.117-150, 2016.

A. Glynn and K. Quinn, An Introduction to the Augmented Inverse Propensity Weighted Estimator, Political Analysis, vol.18, issue.1, pp.36-56, 2010.

C. S. Haz?r, J. Lesage, and C. Bernard, The role of R&D collaboration networks on regional knowledge creation: Evidence from information and communication technologies, Papers in Regional Science, vol.97, issue.3, pp.549-567, 2018.

J. Hinloopen, Subsidizing R&d Cooperatives, De economist, vol.149, issue.3, pp.313-345, 2001.

G. W. Imbens, Nonparameteric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity : a review, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol.86, pp.4-29, 2004.

G. W. Imbens and J. M. Wooldridge, Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation, Journal of Economic Literature, vol.47, issue.1, pp.5-86, 2009.

N. Janz, H. Lööf, and B. Peeters, Firm Level Innovation and Productivity -is There a Common Story Across Countries? ZEW Working Paper No, 2003.

J. Kang and J. Schafer, Demystifying double robustness: A comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data, Statistical Science, vol.22, issue.4, pp.523-539, 2007.

P. Krugman, Geography and trade, 1991.

W. L. Leite, Practical propensity score methods using R, 2016.

D. Lucena-piquero and J. Vicente, The visible hand of cluster policy makers: An analysis of Aerospace Valley (2006-2015) using a place-based network methodology, Research Policy, vol.48, issue.3, pp.830-842, 2019.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02074787

B. Lundvall, The Economics of Knowledge and Learning, 2004.

. Lundvall, Product Innovation, Interactive Learning and Economic Performance (Research on Technological Innovation and Management Policy, vol.8, pp.21-42

M. Mamdani, K. Sykora, P. Li, S. L. Normand, D. Streiner et al., Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: Assessing potential for confounding, British Medical Journal, vol.330, issue.7497, pp.960-962, 2005.

A. Marshall, Principles of economics, 1920.

P. Martin, T. Mayer, and F. Mayneris, Public support to clusters: a firm-level study of French "Local Productive Systems, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol.41, pp.108-123, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01066195

D. Mccaffrey, G. Ridgeway, and A. Morral, Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies, Psychological Methods, vol.9, pp.403-425, 2004.

J. Nishimura and H. Okamuro, R&D Productivity and the Organization of Cluster Policy: An Empirical Evaluation of the Industrial Cluster Project in Japan, The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol.36, issue.2, pp.117-144, 2011.

S. Normand, M. Landrum, E. Guadagnoli, J. Ayanian, T. Ryan et al., Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol.54, issue.4, pp.387-398, 2001.

, Competitive regional clusters: National policy approaches, OECD Reviews of Regional Innovation, p.350, 2007.

. Oecd, Technology and Innovation Outlook, Science, p.280, 2010.

A. Olmos and P. Govindasamy, A practical guide for using propensity score weighting in R. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, vol.20, issue.13, pp.1-8, 2015.

C. Phelps, A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation, Academy of Management Journal, vol.53, pp.890-913, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00528392

S. Phlippen and B. Van-der-knaap, When clusters become networks. Tinbergen Institute, 2007.

M. Porter, Clusters and the New Economics of Competition, Harv. Bus. Rev, 1998.

P. Rosenbaum, Observational studies, 2002.

F. Rossi, A. Caloffi, and M. Russo, Networked by design: Can policy requirements influence organisations' networking behaviour?, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol.105, pp.203-214, 2016.

D. Rubin, Estimating the Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Non-Randomized Studies, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.66, pp.688-701, 1974.

D. Rubin, Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization, Annals of Statistics, vol.6, pp.34-58, 1978.

D. Rubin, Discussion of "randomization analysis of experimental data in the Fisher randomization test, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.75, pp.591-593, 1980.

M. Sakakibara, Evaluating government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan: who benefits and how, Research Policy, vol.26, pp.447-473, 1997.

J. L. Schafer and J. Kang, Average causal effects from nonrandomized studies: A practical guide and simulated example, Psychological Methods, vol.13, issue.4, pp.279-313, 2008.

T. Scherngell and M. J. Barber, Spatial interaction modelling of cross-region R&D collaborations. Empirical evidence from the 5th EU Framework Programme, Papers in Regional Science, vol.88, issue.3, pp.531-546, 2009.

T. Scherngell and R. Lata, Towards an integrated European Research Area? Findings from Eigenvector spatially filtered spatial interaction models using European Framework Programme data, Papers in Regional Science, vol.92, issue.3, pp.555-577, 2013.

C. Stone and Y. Tang, Comparing propensity score methods in balancing covariates and recovering impact in small sample educational program evaluations, Research & Evaluation, vol.18, issue.13, pp.1-12, 2013.

E. Technopolis and . Bearingpoint, Etude portant sur l'évaluation des pôles de compétitivité, report for DATAR and DGCIS, 2012.

P. Teirlinck and A. Spithoven, Fostering industry-science cooperation through public funding: differences between universities and public research centres, The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol.37, issue.5, pp.676-695, 2012.

M. V. Tomasello, M. Napoletano, A. Garas, and F. Schweitzer, The rise and fall of R&D networks, Industrial and corporate change, vol.26, issue.4, pp.617-646, 2017.

G. Van-leeuwen, Linking Innovation to Productivity Growth Using Two Waves of the Community Innovation Survey, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2002.

J. Vicente, Don't Throw the Baby out with the Bath Water: Network Failures and Policy Challenges for Cluster Long Run Dynamics, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 2014.

I. Wanzenböck, T. Scherngell, and M. M. Fischer, How do firm characteristics affect behavioural additionalities of public R&D subsidies? Evidence for the Austrian transport sector, 2013.

, Technovation, vol.33, issue.2-3, pp.66-77

R. K. Woolthuis, M. Lankhuizen, and V. Gilsing, A system failure framework for innovation policy design, vol.25, pp.609-619, 2005.

, Funding This work was supported by the French National Research Agency