Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean?(or it takes at least two to tango), Soc Sci Med, vol.44, issue.5, pp.681-92 ,
The measurement of health-related quality of life for use in resource allocation decisions in health care, Culyer AJ, pp.1723-60, 2000. ,
Comparison of General Population, Patient, and Carer Utility Values for Dementia Health States, Med Decis Mak, vol.35, issue.1, pp.68-80 ,
Patient preference and decision-making for initiating metastatic colorectal cancer medical treatment, J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, vol.142, issue.3, pp.699-706 ,
Estimating Utilities for Liver Diseases Using Standard Gamble Method. Value Heal, vol.19, p.838 ,
Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D, Value Heal, vol.19, issue.4, pp.343-52 ,
Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England, Health Econ, vol.27, issue.1, pp.7-22 ,
A Time Tradeoff-derived Value Set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada, Med Care, vol.54, issue.1, pp.98-105 ,
The EQ-5D-5L valuation study in Korea, Qual Life Res, vol.25, issue.7, pp.1845-52 ,
Feasibility, comparability, and reliability of the standard gamble compared with the rating scale and time trade-off techniques in Korean population, Qual Life Res, vol.26, issue.12, pp.3387-97 ,
A Review of Generic Preference-Based Measures for Use in Cost-Effectiveness Models, Pharmacoeconomics, vol.35, issue.1, pp.21-31 ,
Development and validation of a preference based measure derived from the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR) for use in cost utility analyses, Health Qual Life Outcomes, vol.6, issue.1, p.65 ,
Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine, Jama, vol.316, issue.10, pp.1093-103 ,
,
, American Urological Association and Society for Medical Decision Making Quality Improvement Summit 2016: Shared Decision Making and Prostate Cancer Screening
,
Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes, Med Decis Mak, vol.35, issue.1, pp.114-145 ,
EuroQol Protocols for Time Trade-Off Valuation of Health Outcomes, Pharmacoeconomics, vol.34, issue.10, pp.993-1004 ,
Standard gamble, time trade-off and rating scale: Experimental results on the ranking properties of QALYs, J Health Econ, vol.16, issue.2, pp.155-75 ,
Preferences for health outcomes. Comparison of assessment methods, Med Decis Mak, vol.4, issue.3, pp.315-344 ,
The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public, J Chronic Dis, vol.31, pp.697-704 ,
A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities, Health Econ, vol.456, pp.447-56 ,
Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern Utilities When Probabilities Are Distorted or Unknown, Manage Sci, vol.42, issue.8, pp.1131-50 ,
Towards a better QALY model, Health Econ, vol.15, issue.7, pp.665-76 ,
QALYs without bias? Non-parametric correction of time trade-off and standard gamble utilities based on prospect theory ,
, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 2017.
Do couples discount future consequences less than individuals?, Univ Rennes, vol.1, pp.2013-2033 ,
Patience and time consistency in collective decisions, Exp Econ, vol.20, issue.1, pp.181-208 ,
Are individuals more risk and ambiguity averse in a group environment or alone? Results from an experimental study, Theory Decis, vol.78, issue.3, pp.357-76 ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01189933
Risk-Taking Behavior: An Experimental Analysis of Individuals and Dyads, South Econ J, vol.79, issue.2, pp.277-99 ,
Risk preference differentials of small groups and individuals, Econ J, vol.118, issue.525, pp.258-83 ,
Group versus individual decision-making: Is there a shift, Sch Soc Sci Econ Work Pap, vol.91 ,
How groups reach agreement in risky choices: an experiment, Econ Inq, vol.50, issue.2, pp.502-517 ,
Group decisions under ambiguity: Convergence to neutrality, J Econ Behav Organ, vol.103, pp.60-71 ,
An examination of ambiguity aversion: Are two heads better than one?, Judgm Decis Mak, vol.2, pp.390-397 ,
Individual vs. couple behavior: an experimental investigation of risk preferences, Theory Decis, vol.75, issue.2, pp.175-91 ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00801311
Are groups more (or less) consistent than individuals?, J Risk Uncertain, vol.18, issue.1, pp.63-81 ,
Teams take the better risks, J Econ Behav Organ, vol.63, issue.3, pp.412-434 ,
Victims of groupthink: a psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes, 1972. ,
Alive and Well after 25 Years: A Review of Groupthink Research, Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, vol.2, issue.73, pp.116-157 ,
Utility functions for life years and health status, Oper Res, vol.28, issue.1, pp.206-230 ,
Measuring Decreasing and Increasing Impatience, Manage Sci ,
Measuring self-control problems, Am Econ Rev, vol.97, issue.3, pp.966-72 ,
Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L), Qual life Res, vol.20, issue.10, pp.1727-1763 ,
Aggregating health state valuations, J Health Serv Res Policy, vol.2, issue.3, pp.160-165 ,
The correction of TTO-scores for utility curvature using a riskfree utility elicitation method, J Health Econ, vol.28, issue.1, pp.234-277 ,
A Program of Methodological Research to Arrive at the New International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol. Value Heal, effect : IDM: I1 vs. I2 | CDM: I1 vs G, vol.17, pp.445-53 ,
If we repeat these analyses (I1 vs I2) for CDM, we find a significant decrease (Morgan-Pittman tests, all p's < 0.034) in variance, with the exception of the most severe health state Q3 for both SG and TTO ,