S. Auroux, Le processus de grammatisation et ses enjeux, Histoire des idées linguistiques, pp.11-64, 1992.

S. Auroux, La révolution technologique de la grammatisation, 1994.

D. Beck, Some language-particular terms are comparative concepts, Linguistic Typology, vol.20, pp.395-402, 2016.

W. Croft, Comparative concepts and language-spécific categories: Theory and practice, Linguistic Typology, vol.20, pp.377-393, 2016.

Ö. Dahl, Thoughts on language-specific and crosslinguistic entities, Linguistic Typology, vol.20, pp.427-437, 2016.

M. S. Dryer, Crosslinguistic categories, comparative concepts, and the Walman diminutive, Linguistic Typology, vol.20, pp.305-331, 2016.

D. Gil, Describing languoids : When incommensurability meets the language-dialect continuum, Linguistic Typology, vol.20, pp.439-462, 2016.

A. Guillaume, Associated motion in South America: Typological and areal perspectives, Linguistic Typology, vol.20, pp.81-177, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01918336

M. Haspelmath, Pre-established categories don't exist: Consequences for language description and typology, Linguistic Typology 11, pp.119-132, 2007.

M. Haspelmath, Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies, Language, vol.86, pp.663-687, 2010.

M. Haspelmath, The challenge of making language description and comparison mutually beneficial, Linguistic Typology, vol.20, pp.299-303, 2016.

Y. Lander and P. Arkadiev, On the right of being comparative concept, Linguistic Typology, vol.20, pp.403-416, 2016.

R. J. Lapolla, On categorization: Stick to the facts of the languages, Linguistic Typology, vol.20, pp.365-375, 2016.

J. Rijkhoff, Crosslinguistic categories in morphosyntactic typology: Problems and prospects, Linguistic Typology, vol.20, pp.333-363, 2016.