S. Amaral-garcia and N. Garoupa, Do Administrative Courts Favor the Government? Evidence from Medical Malpractice in Spain, 7th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, 2012.

S. Amaral-garcia, N. Garoupa, and V. Grembi, Judicial Independence and Party Politics in the Kelsenian Constitutional Courts: The Case of Portugal, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol.6, issue.2, pp.381-404, 2009.

S. Eisenberg, , 2012.

O. Ashenfelter, T. Eisenberg, and S. J. Schwab, Politics and the Judicary, Journal of Legal Studies, vol.24, pp.257-281, 1995.

P. Bentata, Environmental Regulation and Civil Liability under Causal Uncertainty: An Empirical Study of the French Legal System, Review of Law and Economics, vol.9, issue.2, pp.239-263, 2013.

P. Bentata, Liability as a Complement to Environmental Regulation: An Empirical Study of The French Legal System, Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, vol.16, issue.3, pp.201-228, 2013.

P. Bentata and M. G. Faure, The Role of Environmental Civil Liability: An Economic Analysis, Environmental Liability, vol.20, issue.4, pp.120-128, 2012.

H. Berger and M. Neugart, Labor Courts, Nomination Bias, and Unemployment in Germany, European Journal of Political Economy, vol.27, pp.659-673, 2011.

B. Bogoch and R. Don-yechiya, The Gender of Justice: Bias Against Women in Israeli Courts, Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies, 1999.

B. H. Bornstein, K. , and M. M. , Does a Judge's Religion Influence Decision Making? Court Review, The Journal of the American Judges Association, vol.45, pp.112-115, 2009.

C. L. Boyd, L. Epstein, and A. D. Martin, Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging, American Journal of Political Science, vol.54, pp.389-411, 2010.

S. J. Choi and M. Gulati, Bias in Judical Citations: A Window into the Behavior of, Judges? Journal of Legal Studies, vol.37, issue.1, pp.87-129, 2008.

S. J. Choi, M. Gulati, M. Holman, and E. A. Posner, Judging Women, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol.8, issue.3, pp.504-532, 2011.

K. M. Clermont and T. Eisenberg, Trial by Jury or Judge: Transcending Empiricism, Cornell Law Review, vol.77, pp.1124-1177, 1992.

K. M. Clermont and T. Eisenberg, Do Case Outcomes Really Reveal Anything About the Legal System? Win Rates and Removal Jurisdiction, Cornell Law Review, vol.83, pp.581-607, 1998.

K. M. Clermont and T. Eisenberg, Appeal from Jury or Judge Trial: Defendants' Advantage, American Law and Economics Review, vol.3, issue.1, pp.125-164, 2001.

K. M. Clermont and T. Eisenberg, Plaintiphobia in the Appellate Courts: Civil Rights really Do Differ from Negotiable Instruments, pp.947-977, 2002.

F. B. Cross, Political Science and the New Legal Realism: A case for Unfortunate Interdisciplinary Ignorance, Northwestern University Law Review, vol.92, issue.1, pp.251-326, 1997.

C. Desrieux and R. Espinosa, Conseils de Prud'hommes, Syndicats et Résolution des litiges : une analyse Économique. Les Cahiers de la Justice, pp.533-545, 2015.

J. Donohue and P. Siegelman, Study the Iceberg From its Tip: A Comparison of Published and Unpublished Employment Discrimination Cases, Yale Faculty Scholarship Series Papers, p.43, 1990.

T. Eisenberg, Testing the Selection Effect: A New Theoretical Framework with Empirical Tests, Journal of Legal Studies, vol.19, issue.2, pp.337-358, 1990.

T. Eisenberg, Appeal Rates and Outcomes in Tried and Nontried Cases: Further Exploration of Anti-Plaintiff Appellate Outcomes, Journal of Legal Studies, vol.1, issue.3, pp.659-688, 2004.

T. Eisenberg and H. S. Farber, The Government as Litigant: Further Tests of the Case Selection Model, American Law and Economics Review, vol.5, issue.1, pp.94-133, 2003.

T. Eisenberg and H. S. Farber, Why do Plaintiffs Lose Appeals? Biased Trial Courts, Litigious Losers, or Low Trial Win Rates, American Law and Economics Review, vol.15, issue.1, pp.73-109, 2013.

T. Eisenberg, T. Fisher, and I. Rosen-zvi, Israel's Supreme Court Appellate Jurisdiction: An Empirical Study, Cornell Law Review, vol.96, pp.693-725, 2011.

T. Eisenberg, T. Fisher, and I. Rosen-zvi, Does the Judge Matter? Exploiting Random Assignment on a Court of Last Resort to Assess Judge and Case Selection Effects, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol.9, issue.2, pp.246-290, 2012.

T. Eisenberg, T. Fisher, and I. Rosen-zvi, Case Selection and Dissent in Courts of Last Resort: An Empirical Study of the Israel Supreme Court, pp.181-215, 2014.

T. Eisenberg and M. Heise, Plaintiphobia in State Courts? An Empirical Study of State Courts Trials on Appeal, Journal of Legal Studies, vol.38, pp.121-137, 2009.

T. Eisenberg and K. Huang, The Effects of Rule Shifting Supreme Courts Decisions from Mandatory to Discretionary: An Empirical Lesson from Taiwan, International Review of Law and Economics, vol.32, pp.3-18, 2012.

L. Epstein and A. D. Martin, Does Public Opinion Influence the Supreme Court? Possibly Yes (But We're Not Sure Why), vol.13, pp.263-281, 2010.

R. Espinosa, L'indépendance du Conseil constitutionnel français en question. Les Cahiers de la Justice, pp.546-561, 2015.

R. Espinosa, Constitutional Judicial Behavior: Exploring the Determinants of the Decisions of the French Constitutional Council, Review of Law and Economics, vol.13, issue.2, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01634213

R. Franck, Judicial Independence Under a Divided Polity: A Study of the Rulings of the French Constitutional Court, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, vol.25, issue.1, pp.262-284, 2009.

B. Friedman, Taking Law Seriously. Perspective and Politics, vol.4, issue.2, pp.261-276, 2006.

P. Frydman, Administrative Justice in France, 11th AIJA Tribunals Conference, 2008.

O. Gazal-ayal and R. Sulitzeanu-kenan, Let My People Go: Ethnic In-Group Bias in Judicial Decisions: Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol.7, issue.3, pp.403-428, 2010.

J. D. Greiner and D. B. Rubin, Causal Effects of Perceived Immutable Characteristics, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol.93, issue.3, pp.775-785, 2011.

M. Hall, Randomness Reconsidered: Modeling Random Judicial Assignment in the U, S. Courts of Appeals. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol.7, issue.3, pp.574-589, 2010.

A. Harvey and B. Friedman, Ducking Trouble: Congressionally Induced Selection Bias in Supreme Court's Agenda, Journal of Politics, vol.71, issue.2, pp.574-592, 2009.

A. Ichino, M. Polo, R. , and E. , Are Judges Biased by Labor Market Conditions?, European Economic Review, vol.47, pp.913-944, 2003.

J. P. Kastellec and J. R. Lax, Case Selection and the Study of Judicial Politics, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol.5, issue.3, pp.407-446, 2008.

D. M. Keele, R. W. Malmsheimer, D. W. Floyd, and L. Zhang, An Analysis of Ideological Effects in Published Versus Unpublished Judicial Opinions, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, vol.6, issue.1, pp.213-239, 2009.

H. M. Kritzer and M. J. Richards, Deciding the Supreme Court's Administrative Law Cases: Does Chevron Matter?, Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 2002.

A. Lambert-mogiliansky, K. Sonin, and E. Zhuravskaya, Are Russian Commercial Courts Biased? Evidence from a Natural Bankruptcy Experiment, 2006.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00590402

D. S. Law, Strategic Judicial Lawmaking: Ideology, Publication, and Asylum Law in the Ninth Circuit, vol.73, pp.817-865, 2005.

M. Macis, Il Mercato del Lavoro e la Giurisprudenza in Materia di Licenziamenti (Italia 1989-1998), Diritti delle Relazioni Industriali, vol.2, 2001.

M. Malo, A. Martin-roman, and A. Moral, Peer effects" or "quasi-peer effects, 2016.

I. Marinescu, L'application du droit du travail est-elle biaisée par les conditions économiques?, 2003.

I. Marinescu, Are Judges Sensitive to Economic Conditions? Evidence from U.K. Employment Tribunals, Industrial and Labot Relations Review, vol.64, issue.4, pp.673-698, 2011.

A. D. Martin, K. M. Quinn, and L. Epstein, The Median Justice on the United States Supreme Court, North Carolina Law Review, vol.83, issue.5, pp.1275-1320, 2005.

D. J. Merritt and J. J. Brudney, Stalking Secret Law: What Predicts Publication in the United State Courts of Appeals, Vanderbilt Law Review, vol.54, pp.71-121, 2001.

G. L. Priest and B. Klein, The Selection of Disputes for Litigation, Journal of Legal Studies, vol.13, pp.1-55, 1984.

P. R. Rosenbaum and D. B. Rubin, The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects, Biometrika, vol.70, issue.1, pp.41-55, 1983.

P. R. Rosenbaum and D. B. Rubin, Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.79, issue.387, pp.516-524, 1984.

S. Shavell, The Appeals Process as a Means of Error Correction, Journal of Legal Studies, vol.24, pp.379-426, 1995.

M. Shayo and A. Zussman, Judicial Ingroup Bias in the Shadow of Terrorism, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.126, p.1447, 2011.

P. T. Spiller and R. Gely, Congressional Control or Judicial Independence: The Determinants of U.S. Supreme Court Labor-relations Decisions, RAND Journal of Economics, vol.23, issue.4, pp.463-492, 1992.

C. R. Sunstein, D. Schkade, L. M. Ellman, and A. Sawicki, Are Judges Political? An Empirical Analysis of the Federal Judicary, 2006.