Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

ΑΙΤΙΟΛΟΓΙΑ : mythe et procédure étiologique

Abstract : Contemporary discourse generally represents etiology as a «search for causes» that shares its goals with scientific history without reaching its results. An examination of the discursive practices of ancient authors demonstrates that etiology is not exactly a frame of thought, but rather rests upon a specific narrative mechanism that connects two complementary components through an identification process. Etiology, which works because of the co-presence of these two components, does not set out to search a univocal cause to a ritual or a name, but builds a present and a past which exist as mirrors to each other. Etiology is a semiology which rests upon a principle of authority, rather than upon a reference to reality.
Complete list of metadata

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02090775
Contributor : Agnès Tapin <>
Submitted on : Friday, April 5, 2019 - 10:35:37 AM
Last modification on : Tuesday, March 2, 2021 - 10:07:39 AM

Identifiers

Citation

Charles Delattre. ΑΙΤΙΟΛΟΓΙΑ : mythe et procédure étiologique. Mètis - Anthropologie des mondes grecs anciens, Daedalus/EHESS, 2009, N.S.7, pp.285-310. ⟨10.4000/books.editionsehess.2490⟩. ⟨halshs-02090775⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

533