Promoting socially desirable behaviors: experimental comparison of the procedures of persuasion and commitment

Abstract : In a series of experiments, we test the relative efficiency of persuasion and commitment schemes to increase and sustain contribution levels in a Voluntary Contribution Game. The design allows to compare a baseline consisting of a repeated public good game to, respectively, four manipulation treatments relying on: an information strategy, a low commitment strategy, a high commitment strategy and a promise strategy. We confirm the advantages of psychologically orientated policies as they increase the overall level of contribution and for some, that is commitment and promises, question the decreasing trend traditionally observed in long term contributions to public goods.
Document type :
Preprints, Working Papers, ...
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [38 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02016069
Contributor : Nelly Wirth <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, February 12, 2019 - 3:39:50 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, April 24, 2019 - 11:14:05 AM
Long-term archiving on : Monday, May 13, 2019 - 6:16:34 PM

File

1907.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : halshs-02016069, version 1

Citation

Cécile Bazart, Mathieu Lefebvre, Julie Rosaz. Promoting socially desirable behaviors: experimental comparison of the procedures of persuasion and commitment. 2019. ⟨halshs-02016069⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

52

Files downloads

257