D. W. Abbott and J. P. Levine, Wrong Winners: The Coming Debacle in the Electoral College, 1991.

C. Alós-ferrer and D. Granic, Approval Voting in Germany: Description of a Field Experiment, Handbook on Approval Voting, pp.397-411, 2010.

K. J. Arrow, Social Choice and Individual Values, 1963.

W. J. Ball and D. A. Leuthold, Estimating the Likelihood of an Unpopular Verdict in the Electoral College, Public Choice, vol.70, pp.215-224, 1991.

F. Barthélémy, M. Martin, and A. Piggins, The Architecture of the Electoral College, House Size Effects, and the Referendum Paradox, Electoral Studies, vol.34, pp.111-118, 2014.

A. Baujard and H. Igersheim, Framed field experiments on approval voting: Lessons from the 2002 ad 2017 French presidential elections, Handbook on Approval Voting, pp.357-395, 2010.

A. Baujard, F. Gavrel, H. Igersheim, J. Laslier, and I. Lebon, Who's Favored by Evaluative Voting? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election, Electoral Studies, vol.34, pp.131-145, 2014.

A. Blais and I. Indridason, Making candidates count: the logic of electoral alliances in two-round legislative elections, The Journal of Politics, vol.69, issue.1, pp.193-205, 2007.

S. J. Brams and P. C. Fishburn, Approval voting, American Political Science Review, vol.72, pp.831-847, 1978.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00119047

S. J. Brams and P. C. Fishburn, Approval Voting, 1983.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00119047

R. Davidson, Stochastic dominance, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, pp.921-925, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00443560

M. Duverger, English translation: Political Parties: Their Organization and Activities in the Modern State, Les partis politiques. Paris: Armand Colin, 1951.

W. Gaertner and Y. Xu, A general scoring rule, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.63, pp.193-196, 2012.

B. Grofman and B. Dolez, Situ and Laboratory experiments on Electoral Law Reform: French Presidential Elections, 2011.

C. Hillinger, On the possibility of democracy and rational collective choice, 2004.

C. Hillinger, Voting and the cardinal aggregation of judgments, 2004.

E. W. Koc, An Experimental Examination of Approval Voting under Alternative Ballot Conditions, Polity, vol.20, pp.688-704, 1988.

P. Kurrild-klitgaard, Trump, Condorcet and Borda: Voting paradoxes in the 2016 Republican presidential primaries, European Journal of Political Economy, 2017.

R. Lahrach and V. Merlin, Which Voting Rules Minimizes the Probability of the Referendum Paradox: Lessons from French Data, Electoral Systems, Studies in Social Choice and Welfare, pp.129-150, 2012.

J. Laslier, A. Blais, D. Bol, S. N. Golder, P. Harfst et al., The Euro Vote Plus Experiment, European Union Politics, vol.16, pp.601-615, 2015.

, Handbook on Approval Voting

D. Lepelley, V. Merlin, and J. Rouet, Three Ways to Compute Accurately the Probability of the Referendum Paradox, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.23, pp.227-257, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00602133

A. Macé, Voting with Evaluations: Characterizations of Evaluative Voting and Range Voting, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol.79, pp.10-17, 2018.


N. R. Miller, Why the Electoral College is Good for Political Science (and Public Choice), Public Choice, vol.150, pp.1-25, 2012.

N. R. Miller, The House Size Effect and the Referendum paradox in U.S. Presidential Elections, Electoral Studies, vol.35, pp.265-271, 2014.

J. H. Nagel, A Debut for Approval Voting, PS: Political Science &Politics, vol.17, pp.61-65, 1984.

M. Núñez and J. Laslier, Preference Intensity Representation: Strategic Overstating in Large Elections, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.42, pp.313-340, 2014.

M. Pivato, Formal utilitarianism and range voting, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.67, pp.50-56, 2013.

J. Riley, Utilitarian Ethics and Democratic Government, Ethics, vol.100, pp.335-348, 1990.