A. Bhattacherjee, Individual Trust in Online Firms: Scale Development and Initial Test, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol.19, issue.1, pp.211-241, 2002.
DOI : 10.4018/jebr.2006100102

D. T. Campbell and D. W. Fiske, Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix, Psychological Bulletin, vol.56, issue.2, pp.81-105, 1959.
DOI : 10.1037/h0046016

J. M. Conway and C. E. Lance, What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research, Journal of Business and Psychology, vol.25, issue.3, pp.325-334, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6

D. P. Crowne and D. Marlowe, A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology, Journal of Consulting Psychology, vol.24, issue.4, pp.349-354, 1960.

D. H. Doty and W. H. Glick, Common methods bias: does common methods variance really bias results?, Organizational Research Methods, vol.1, issue.4, pp.374-406, 1998.
DOI : 10.1177/109442819814002

F. J. Fowler, How unclear terms affect survey data, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol.56, issue.2, pp.218-231, 1992.

C. M. Fuller, M. J. Simmering, G. Atinc, Y. Atinc, and B. J. Babin, Common methods variance detection in business research, Journal of Business Research, vol.69, issue.8, pp.3192-3198, 2016.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008

L. Goldberg, A Model of Item Ambiguity in Personality Assessment, Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol.23, issue.3, pp.467-492, 1963.

T. R. Graeff, Response Bias, Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, vol.1, pp.411-418, 2004.

T. R. Hinkin, A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations, Journal of Management, vol.21, issue.5, pp.967-988, 1995.

T. R. Hinkin and J. B. Tracey, An Analysis of Variance Approach to Content Validation, Organizational Research Methods, vol.2, issue.2, pp.175-186, 1999.
DOI : 10.1177/109442819922004

URL : http://www.uk.sagepub.com/salkind2study/articles/12Article01.pdf

D. N. Jackson, Desirability Judgments as a Method of Personality Assessment, Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol.24, issue.2, pp.223-238, 1964.
DOI : 10.1177/001316446402400205

J. A. Johnson, Ambiguity, subtlety, and validity of items, 57th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, 1986.

G. C. Kane and S. P. Borgatti, Centrality-Is Proficiency Alignment and Workgroup Performance, MIS Quarterly, vol.35, issue.4, pp.1063-1078, 2010.
DOI : 10.2307/41409973

T. Kollmann, M. Häsel, and N. Breugst, Competence of IT Professionals in EBusiness Venture Teams: The Effect of Experience and Expertise on Preference Structure, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol.25, issue.4, pp.51-80, 2009.

J. A. Krosnick, Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys, Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol.5, issue.3, pp.213-236, 1991.

J. A. Krosnick and D. F. Alwin, An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response-order effects in survey measurement, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol.51, issue.2, p.201, 1987.

D. L. Paulhus, Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct, The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement, 2001.

D. L. Paulhus and O. P. John, Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives, Journal of Personality, vol.66, issue.6, pp.1025-1060, 1998.

E. Peer, S. Samat, L. Brandimarte, and A. Acquisti, Beyond the Turk : Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol.70, pp.153-163, 2017.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006

R. E. Petty and J. T. Cacioppo, The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol.19, pp.123-205, 1986.

N. P. Podsakoff, P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. Mackenzie, and R. L. Klinger, Are We Really Measuring What We Say We're Measuring? Using Video Techniques to Supplement Traditional Construct Validation Procedures, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.98, issue.1, pp.99-113, 2012.

P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. Mackenzie, J. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff, Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, The Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.88, issue.5, pp.879-903, 2003.

H. A. Richardson and M. C. Sturman, A Tale of Three Perspectives : Examining Post Hoc Statistical Techniques for Detection and Corrections of Common Method Variance, Organizational Methods, vol.12, issue.4, pp.762-200, 2009.

C. Schriesheim, K. Powers, T. A. Scandura, C. C. Gardiner, and M. J. Lankau, Improving Construct Measurement In Management Research: Comments and A Quantitative Approach for Assessing the Theoretical Content Adequacy of Paper-andPencil Survey-Type Instruments, Journal of Management, vol.19, issue.2, pp.385-417, 1993.

H. Schuman and S. Presser, Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context, 1996.

R. Sharma, P. Yetton, and J. Crawford, Estimating the Effect of Common Method Variance: The Method-Method Pair Technique with an Illustration from TAM Research, MIS Quarterly, vol.33, issue.3, pp.473-490, 2009.

R. Tourangeau, L. J. Rips, and K. Rasinski, The Psychology of Survey Response, 2000.

O. Turel, A. Serenko, and P. Giles, Integrating Technology Addiction and Use: an Empirical Investigation of Online Auction Users, MIS Quarterly, vol.35, issue.4, pp.1043-1061, 2011.

V. Venkatesh, S. Brown, L. Maruping, and H. Bala, Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: the competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation, MIS Quarterly, vol.32, issue.3, pp.483-502, 2008.

D. Watson, Correcting for acquiescent response bias in the absence of a balanced scale: An application to class consciousness, Sociological Methods & Research, vol.21, issue.1, pp.52-88, 1992.

A. B. Woszczynski and M. E. Whitman, The Problem of Common Method Variance in IS Research, The Handbook of Information Systems Research, pp.66-78, 2004.

G. Yao, C. H. Wu, and C. T. Yang, Examining the content validity of the WHOQOLBREF from respondents' perspective by quantitative methods, Social Indicators Research, vol.85, issue.3, pp.483-498, 2008.

J. L. Zaichkowsky, Measuring the Involvement Construct, Journal of Consumer Research, vol.12, issue.3, pp.341-352, 1985.