J. C. Anderson and D. W. Gerbing, Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, vol.103, issue.3, pp.411-423, 1988.

M. Avital and D. Eni, From generative fit to generative capacity: Exploring an emerging dimension of information systems design and task performance, Information Systems Journal, vol.19, issue.4, pp.345-367, 2009.

J. T. Cacioppo, R. E. Petty, C. F. Kao, and R. Rodriguez, Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.51, issue.5, p.1032, 1986.
DOI : 10.1037//0022-3514.51.5.1032

D. T. Campbell and D. W. Fiske, Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix, Psychological Bulletin, vol.56, issue.2, pp.81-105, 1959.

F. D. Davis, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, vol.13, issue.3, pp.319-340, 1989.

R. F. Devellis, Scale Development: Theory and Applications, Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol.26, 2003.

M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research, 1975.

C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, vol.18, issue.1, pp.382-388, 1981.
DOI : 10.2307/3151312

E. Frenkel-brunswik, Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable, Journal of Personality, vol.18, pp.108-143, 1949.

A. Furnham and T. Ribchester, Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the concept, its measurement and applications, Current Psychology, vol.14, issue.3, pp.179-199, 1995.

R. Garud, S. Jain, and P. Tuertscher, Incomplete by design and designing for incompleteness, Organization Studies, vol.29, issue.3, pp.351-371, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-92966-6_7

R. L. Goldstone and A. Kersten, Concepts and Categorization, Handbook of Psychology, pp.599-621, 2003.

M. R. Goode, D. W. Dahl, and C. P. Moreau, Innovation aesthetics: The relationship between category cues, categorization certainty, and newness perceptions, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol.30, issue.2, pp.192-208, 2013.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00995.x

T. R. Hinkin and J. B. Tracey, An Analysis of Variance Approach to Content Validation, Organizational Research Methods, vol.2, issue.2, pp.175-186, 1999.
DOI : 10.1177/109442819922004
URL : https://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1514&context=articles

L. Hu and P. M. Bentler, Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, vol.6, issue.1, pp.1-55, 1999.

J. Kallinikos, A. Aaltonen, and A. Marton, The Ambivalent Ontology of Digital Artifacts, MIS Quarterly, vol.37, issue.2, pp.357-370, 2013.

J. A. Krosnick, D. S. Boninger, Y. C. Chuang, M. K. Berent, and C. G. Carnot, Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.65, issue.6, p.1132, 1993.
DOI : 10.1037//0022-3514.65.6.1132

P. B. Lowry, J. E. Gaskin, and G. D. Moody, Proposing the Multimotive Information Systems Continuance Model ( MISC ) to Better Explain End-User System Evaluations and Continuance Intentions, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol.16, issue.7, pp.515-579, 2015.
DOI : 10.17705/1jais.00403
URL : http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1714&context=jais

S. B. Mackenzie, P. M. Podsakoff, and N. P. Podsakoff, Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques, vol.35, pp.293-334, 2011.

D. P. Mackinnon, C. M. Lockwood, J. M. Hoffman, S. G. West, and V. Sheets, A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects, Psychological Methods, vol.7, issue.1, p.83, 2002.

D. P. Mackinnon, C. M. Lockwood, and J. Williams, Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods, Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol.39, issue.1, pp.99-128, 2004.

D. L. Medin and J. D. Coley, Concepts and Categorization. In Perception and cognition at century's end: Handbook of perception and cognition, pp.403-439, 1998.

J. Meyers-levy and A. M. Tybout, Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation, Journal of Consumer Research, vol.16, issue.1, pp.39-54, 1989.
DOI : 10.1086/209192

C. P. Moreau, A. B. Markman, and D. R. Lehmann, What is it?" categorization flexibility and consumers' responses to really new products, Journal of Consumer Research, vol.27, issue.4, pp.489-498, 2001.
DOI : 10.1086/319623

T. J. Noseworthy and R. Trudel, Looks Interesting, but What Does It Do? Evaluation of Incongruent Product Form Depends on Positioning, Journal of Marketing Research, vol.48, pp.1008-1019, 2011.
DOI : 10.1509/jmr.10.0384

J. C. Nunnally, Psychometric theory, 1978.

J. V. Petrocelli, Z. L. Tormala, and D. D. Rucker, Unpacking Attitude Certainty : Attitude Clarity and Attitude Correctness, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.92, issue.1, pp.30-41, 2007.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.30
URL : http://psych.wfu.edu/petrocelli/Petrocelli et al. (2007).pdf

P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. Mackenzie, J. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff, Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, The Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.88, issue.5, pp.879-903, 2003.

E. E. Smith and D. L. Medin, Categories and concepts, 1981.

D. W. Straub and D. Gefen, Validation Guidelines for Is Positivist, vol.13, pp.380-427, 2004.
DOI : 10.17705/1cais.01324
URL : https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3243&context=cais

F. Uekermann, A. Herrmann, D. Wentzel, and J. R. Landwehr, The Influence of Stimulus Ambiguity on Category and Attitude Formation, Review of Managerial Science, vol.4, issue.1, pp.33-52, 2010.

V. Venkatesh, S. Brown, L. Maruping, and H. Bala, Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: the competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation, MIS Quarterly, vol.32, issue.3, pp.483-502, 2008.

V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View, MIS Quarterly, vol.27, issue.3, pp.425-478, 2003.
DOI : 10.2307/30036540
URL : http://www.coba.usf.edu/departments/isds/faculty/abhatt/bs/venkatesh03-itacceptance.pdf

V. Venkatesh, J. Y. Thong, and X. Xu, Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, MIS Quarterly, vol.36, issue.1, pp.157-178, 2012.

P. Winkielman, N. Schwarz, T. Fazendeiro, and R. Reber, The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment, The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion, pp.189-217, 2003.

X. Zhao, J. G. Lynch, Q. Chen, J. G. Lynch, and Q. Chen, Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis, Journal of Consumer Research, vol.37, issue.2, pp.197-206, 2010.
DOI : 10.1086/651257
URL : https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/bitstream/10161/4143/1/279443600001.pdf