Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Other publications

A Broomean model of rationality and reasoning

Abstract : John Broome has developed an account of rationality and reasoning which gives philosophical foundations for choice theory and the psychology of rational agents. We formalize his account into a model that differs from ordinary choice-theoretic models through focusing on psychology and the reasoning process. Within that model, we ask Broome's central question of whether reasoning can make us more rational: whether it allows us to acquire transitive preferences, consistent beliefs, non-akratic intentions, and so on. We identify three structural types of rationality requirements: consistency requirements, completeness requirements, and closedness requirements. Many standard rationality requirements fall under this typology. Based on three theorems, we argue that reasoning is successful in achieving closedness requirements, but not in achieving consistency or completeness requirements. We assess how far our negative results reveal gaps in Broone's theory, or deficiencies in choice theory and behavioural economics.
Document type :
Other publications
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [25 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01904091
Contributor : Lucie Label <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, October 24, 2018 - 5:01:29 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, December 2, 2020 - 3:22:22 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Friday, January 25, 2019 - 3:24:50 PM

File

18030.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : halshs-01904091, version 1

Collections

Citation

Franz Dietrich, Antonios Staras, Robert Sugden. A Broomean model of rationality and reasoning. 2018. ⟨halshs-01904091⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

61

Files downloads

220