Y. Kerbrat, Le droit international face au défi de la réparation des dommages à l'environnement. Rapport général sur le thème de la deuxième demi-journée', in SFDI, Le droit international face au défi de la protection de l'environnement Colloque d, p.125, 2010.

M. Dupuy, À propos des mésaventures de la responsabilité internationale des États dans ses rapports avec la protection de l'environnement, p.280

G. Martin, L'efficacité du droit de l'environnement, mise en oeuvre et sanctions, p.19, 2010.

C. Factory-of, series A, n°17, p.29, 1928.

, Judgment of, Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hongary/Slovakia), p.150, 1997.

A. Award, Moore's International Arbitration Awards, 1898, p.755, 1893.

;. R. Arbitral-award, United States vs Canada, Trail Smelter, vol.III, p.907, 1941.

A. Award, , p.285, 1957.

, Order of 22 Sept, and Nuclear Tests II, p.322, 1974.

N. Case, Responsibilities and obligations of States sponsoring persons and entities with respect to activities in the Area (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Seabed Disputes Chamber), Advisory opinion, 1932.

Y. Kerbrat, Le droit international face au défi de la réparation des dommages à l'environnement. Rapport général sur le thème de la deuxième demi-journée, p.125

, Judgement of 20 th, p.197, 2010.

D. Sarno and O. V. Italy, Request n o 30765/08) case, ECHR decision of 10 th, vol.110, 2012.

N. Case, Responsibilities and obligations of States sponsoring persons and entities with respect to activities in the Area (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Seabed Disputes Chamber), Advisory opinion of ITLOS, p.131

Y. Kerbrat, Le droit international face au défi de la réparation des dommages à l'environnement. Rapport général sur le thème de la deuxième demi-journée, p.133

, The Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions, PCIJ, Reports series A, n°2, p.11, 1924.

. D. Ch and . Visscher, Aspects récents du droit procédural de la Cour internationale de Justice, p.32, 1966.

, South Africa) case, Preliminary objections, ICJ Reports, p.328, 1962.

, 42 This sentence was strongly contested, even within the Court itself. See South West Africa, Second phase, Judgment of 18 th, Preliminary objections, Judgment of, p.31, 1963.

, See also Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, ICJ Reports, p.32, 1970.

, § §87-88, in which the Court considers that the right of peoples to self-determination is a right opposable erga omnes and develops legal consequences for "other States, 2004.

A. Cassese, L. Communauté-internationale, and . Le-génocide, Le droit international au service de la paix, de la justice et du développement Mél. M. Virally, p.186, 1991.

C. Santulli, 47 International Law Commission, Draft articles on State responsibility internationally wrongful act with commentaries, Droit du contentieux international, p.345, 2001.

N. Case, Responsibilities and obligations of States sponsoring persons and entities with respect to activities in the Area (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Seabed Disputes Chamber), Advisory opinion of ITLOS, p.180

, of the environment" in which it recommends to the Committee of Ministers to entrust the appropriate bodies of the Council of Europe with examining the feasibility: (?) b. of an amendment or an additional protocol to the ECHR, concerning the rights of the individual to a healthy and viable environment; see also the Agudo Report to the General Assembly, Doc. 9791, 2003. 72 In 2003, the Assembly endorsed the proposal of "drafting an appropriate instrument, in the form of guidelines or a manual, recapitulating the rights as interpreted in the Court's case-law. Such an instrument could also emphasise the need to strengthen environmental protection at national level, notably as concerns access to information, participation in decision-making processes and access to justice in environmental matters. The Committee of Ministers shares the view that by making more explicit the protection indirectly afforded by the Convention to the environment, 2003.

, Opinion on the elaboration of an additional protocol to the ECHR on the right to a healthy environment, p.12043, 2009.

. Tyrer, United Kingdom (Application n° 5856/72), ECHR decision of 25 th, p.31, 1978.

F. V. Sweden, , p.48, 1991.

. Hamer-v and . Belgium, , p.79, 2007.

, Article 1 of the French Charter for the environment according to which "Everyone has the right to live in a stable environment which respects health

, Request n°36022/97, decision 9 Dec. 1994, series A n°303-C, p.51

O. Hatton, United Kingdom (Application n° 9310/81), ECHR decision of 21 st Feb. 1990, series A n o 172, § 40, vol.81, 2003.

O. V. Turkey, Application n° 48939/99), ECHR decision of 30 th, p.2004, 2004.

F. Haumont, Le droit fondamental à la protection de l'environnement dans la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l'homme et des libertés fondamentales' (2008) Amén., n° spécial, 25. 84 Hatton and others v. United Kingdom, ECHR decision of 8 th, La charte constitutionnelle de l'environnement, Actes du colloque organisé avec la Cour de cassation les 20 et 21 juin 2005 (2005) RJE n° spécial, p.206, 2003.

. Tatar-v.-romania, Request n° 67021/01), ECHR decision of 27, vol.88, 2009.

T. V. Romania, ECHR decision of 19 th, vol.44, 2012.