K. Adam, Experimental Evidence on the Persistence of Output and Inflation, Economic Journal, vol.117, pp.603-635, 2007.

D. Andolfatto, S. Hendry, and K. Moran, Are Inflation Expectations Rational?, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol.55, issue.2, pp.406-422, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2007.07.004

URL : http://128.118.178.162/eps/mac/papers/0501/0501002.pdf

P. Andrade and H. Le-bihan, Inattentive Professional Forecasters, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol.60, issue.8, pp.967-982, 2013.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1728688

URL : https://www.economicdynamics.org/meetpapers/2010/paper_1144.pdf

A. Ang, G. Bekaert, and M. Wei, Do Macro Variables, Asset Markets, or Surveys Forecast Inflation Better?, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol.54, issue.4, pp.1163-1212, 2007.
DOI : 10.3386/w11538

URL : https://doi.org/10.3386/w11538

O. Armantier, W. Bruine-de-bruin, G. Topa, W. Van-der-klaauw, and B. Zafar, Inflation Expectations and Behavior: Do Survey Respondents Act on Their Beliefs?, International Economic Review, vol.56, pp.505-536, 2015.
DOI : 10.1111/iere.12113

URL : http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/86050/1/Experiment%20Paper%20Oct%203%202014.pdf

O. Armantier, W. Van-der-klauw, G. Topa, and B. Zafar, The Price is Right: Updating Inflation Expectations in a Randomized Price Information Experiment, 2017.

C. D. Carroll, Macroeconomic Expectations of Households and Professional Forecasters, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.118, issue.1, pp.269-298, 2003.
DOI : 10.1162/00335530360535207

URL : http://www.econ.jhu.edu/people/ccarroll/EpidemiologyQJE.pdf

O. Coibion and Y. Gorodnichenko, What Can Survey Forecasts Tell Us About Informational Rigidities?, Journal of Political Economy, vol.120, pp.116-159, 2012.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1502930

URL : http://www.econ.berkeley.edu/%7Eygorodni/CoibionGorodnichenko.pdf

O. Coibion and Y. Gorodnichenko, Information Rigidity and the Expectations Formation Process: A Simple Framework and New Facts, American Economic Review, vol.105, issue.8, pp.2644-78, 2015.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1704145

URL : http://emlab.berkeley.edu/~ygorodni/CG_expform.pdf

C. Cornand and F. Heinemann, Experiments on monetary policy and central banking, vol.17, 2014.
DOI : 10.1108/s0193-230620140000017006

C. Cornand and F. Heinemann, Experiments on macroeconomics: methods and applications", prepared for the Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Experimental Economics, 2018.

C. Cornand and C. K. , Does inflation targeting matter? An experimental investigation, Macroeconomic Dynamics, vol.22, issue.2, pp.362-401, 2018.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.2346203

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01293709

C. Cornand and C. K. , Band or Point Target? An Experimental Study, Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 2016.

D. Croushore, The Livingstone Survey: Still useful after all these years, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Business Review, pp.15-27, 1997.

F. Diebold, Forecast combination and encompassing: reconciling two divergent literatures, International Journal of Forecasting, vol.5, pp.589-92, 1989.

F. Diebold and R. Mariano, Comparing Predictive Accuracy, Journal of Economic and Business Statistics, vol.13, pp.253-63, 1995.

L. Dräger, M. Lamla, and D. Pfajfar, Are Survey Expectations Theory-Consistent? The Role of Central Bank Communication and News, European Economic Review, vol.85, pp.84-111, 2016.

J. Duffy, Experimental Macroeconomics, New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2008.

J. Duffy, Macroeconomics: A Survey of Laboratory Research, Handbook of Experimental Economics, vol.2, pp.1-90, 2016.

R. Fendel, E. Lis, and J. Rülke, Do professional forecasters believe in the Phillips curve? Evidence from G7 countries, Journal of Forecasting, vol.30, issue.2, pp.268-87, 2011.

C. H. Hommes, The Heterogeneous Expectations Hypothesis: Some Evidence from the Lab, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol.35, issue.1, pp.1-24, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00753041

C. H. Hommes, A. Kopányi-peuker, and J. Sonnemans, Bubbles, crashes and information contagion in large-group asset market experiments, 2018.

C. H. Hommes, D. Massaro, and M. Weber, Monetary Policy under Behavioral Expectations: Theory and Experiment, Bank of Lithuania Working Paper series, p.42, 2017.

S. Kucinskas and F. S. Peters, Measuring Biases in Expectation Formation, 2018.

M. Lanne, A. Luoma, and J. Luoto, A naïve sticky information model of households' inflation expectations, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol.33, issue.6, pp.1332-1376, 2009.

G. Mankiw and R. Reis, Sticky information versus sticky prices: A proposal to replace the new Keynesian Phillips curve, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.117, issue.4, pp.1295-328, 2002.

G. Mankiw, R. Reis, and J. Wolfers, Disagreement about Inflation Expectations, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, pp.209-257, 2003.

S. Mavroeidis, M. Plagborg-moller, and J. H. Stock, Empirical Evidence on Inflation Expectations in the New Keynesian Phillips Curve, Journal of Economic Literature, vol.52, issue.1, pp.124-88, 2014.

Y. P. Mehra, Survey Measures of Expected Inflation: Revisiting the Issues of Predictive Content and Rationality, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, vol.88, issue.Summer, pp.17-36, 2002.

L. Petersen, Forecast Error Information and Heterogenous Expectations in Learning to Forecast Macroeconomic Experiments, vol.17, 2014.

D. Pfajfar and E. Santoro, Heterogeneity, learning and information stickiness in inflation expectations, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.75, issue.3, pp.426-444, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00849412

D. Pfajfar and ?. B. , Inflation Expectations and Monetary Policy Design: Evidence from the Laboratory, Macroeconomic Dynamics, vol.22, issue.4, pp.1035-75, 2018.

J. M. Roberts, Is Inflation Sticky?, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol.39, pp.173-96, 1997.

C. Romer and D. Romer, Federal Reserve Information and the Behavior of Interest Rates, American Economic Review, vol.90, pp.429-57, 2000.

C. Sims, Implications of Rational Inattention, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol.50, pp.665-90, 2003.

L. B. Thomas, Survey measures of expected US inflation, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.13, issue.4, pp.125-169, 1999.

D. J. Zizzo, Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments, Experimental Economics, vol.13, issue.1, pp.75-98, 2010.

, For surveys, the forecasting horizon for Livingston is 6 or 12 months, for Michigan 1-year, and for SPF 1-quarter and 4-quarter. For central bank forecasts, the horizon is the current and next calendar years for FOMC and 1-quarter and 4-quarter for Greenbook, Note: Standard errors in brackets. * p < 0.10, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01, 2008.

, Note: Standard errors in brackets. * p < 0.10. ** p < 0.05. *** p < 0.01. Parameters are obtained by estimating with OLS the following equation: FE t.t+h = í µí° ¶ í µí°» + í µí»½ í µí°»1 í µí¼‹ t+h/t ???????? + í µí»½ í µí°»2 í µí¼‹ t+h?1/t?1

, for the different categories of economic agents) and the null hypothesis is: the estimated coefficients í µí»½ í µí°»1 and í µí»½ í µí°»2 ?are not significantly different from 0. Market-based forecasts are considered at a daily or monthly frequency. Livingston has a semiannual frequency. Michigan monthly. SPF quarterly. FOMC and Greenbook are taken at a quarterly frequency. N is the size of each sample. For experimental data: PZ indicates data from Pfajfar and Zakelj, ????????????? + í µí¼– í µí±–í µí±¡. where í µí»½ í µí°»1 and í µí»½ í µí°»2 are the estimated coefficients. í µí° ¶ í µí°» is a constant. í µí¼– í µí±–í µí±¡ is the error term (i stands, p.33, 2008.

, Parameters are obtained by estimating equation (6) with OLS, when considering the unemployment gap instead of the output gap. Market-based forecasts are considered at a daily or monthly frequency, Livingston has a semiannual frequency, Michigan monthly, SPF quarterly. FOMC and Greenbook are taken at a quarterly frequency. N is the size of each sample. For market-based forecasts, the forecasting horizon is 3, 5 and 10 years. For surveys, the horizon for Livingston is 6 or 12 months, for Michigan 1-year, and for SPF 1-quarter and 4-quarter, Note: Standard errors in brackets. * p < 0.10, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01