, that supports it so securely?

[. Frege and . Glae, The important question was how this should and could be done. Philosophy alone seems unable to provide the answer. It surely can (and has to) give general criteria for the choice. But, then, specific insights are necessary for implementing those criteria in particular cases. By way of example, consider how Dedekind describes, His (mathematical) problem, we suggest, was not only (and not primarily) that of proving truth, but also (and mainly) that or organizing and structuring theories, vol.III, p.476

, to convince him to undertake an important foundational effort (possibly resulting in the most influential foundational achievement of modern mathematics) in order to avoid appealing to it. For Frege, elucidating it-by avoiding to define continuity (which essentially characterizes magnitudes) by means of some artificial construction based on rational numbers-was the crucial task that an appropriate foundation of real analysis required. Is there any philosophical (epistemic, metaphysical, ontological) criterion for deciding who was right, if any? Founding mathematics, in its deepest essence, means to make and (mathematically) motivate choices like this

V. Batitsky, , 2002.

, Some Measurement-Theoretic Concerns about Hale's 'Reals by Abstraction', Philosophia Mathematica, vol.10, issue.3, pp.286-303

P. Benacerraf, , 1965.

, What Numbers Could Not Be, Philosophical Review, vol.74, issue.1, pp.47-73

P. Benacerraf, Frege: The Last Logicist. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol.6, issue.1, pp.17-36, 1981.

F. Boccuni and M. Panza, On the Logicality of Frege's Definition of real Numbers

G. Currie, Continuity and Change in Frege's Philosophy of Mathematics, Frege synthetisized. Esays on the Philosophical and Foundational Work of Gottlob Frege, pp.345-373, 1986.

R. Dedekind, Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen. F. Vieweg und Sohn, 1888.
DOI : 10.1017/cbo9781139237314
URL : https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/imgsrv/download/pdf?id=njp.32101021035959;orient=0;size=100;seq=9;attachment=0

R. Dedekind, , 1930.

. Gesammelte-mathematische-werke, . Vieweg, . Braunschweig, E. Herausgegeben-von, R. Noether et al., , vol.3

W. Demopoulos, , 1995.

J. A. Díez, , 1997.

, A Hundred Years of Numbers. An Historical Introduction to Measurement Theory 1887-1990. Studies in History and Philophy of Sciences, vol.28, pp.167-185

M. Dummett, , 1991.

. Frege, Philosophy of Mathematics

G. Frege, , 1884.

, Eine logische mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Verrlag von W. Koebner

G. Frege,

, Die Grundgesetze der Arithmetick, volume I-II

G. Frege, Über die Grundlagen der Geometrie, Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung, vol.12, pp.319-324, 1903.

G. Frege,

, The Foundations of Arithmetic. A logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of number, 1950.

G. Frege, On the Foundations of Geometry and Formal Theories of Arithmetic, 1971.

G. Frege,

G. Frege,

, Basic Laws of Arithmetic, 2013.

S. Gandon, , 2012.

, Russell's Unknown Logicism

C. F. Gauss, Announcement of the Commentatio secunda to the Theoria residuorum biquadraticorum, Gottingische gelehrte Anzeigen, 1831, vol.1, pp.169-178, 1831.

C. F. Gauss,

. Werke, Herausgegeben von der Königlichen Gesellchaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen: Vols. 1-6, pp.1863-1917

W. Goldfarb, , 2001.

, Frege's Conception of Logic, Future Pasts: The Analytic Tradition in Twentieth-Century Philosophy, pp.25-41

B. Hale, Reals by Abstraction. Philosophia Mathematica (III), vol.8, pp.100-123, 2000.

B. Hale, Real Numbers, Quantities, and Measurement, vol.10, pp.304-323, 2002.

B. Hale, Definitions of Numbers and their Applications, Abstractionism: Essays in Philosophy of Mathematics, pp.332-349, 2016.

H. Hankel, , 1687.

, Theorie der Complexen Zahlensysteme

, Theil I der Vorlesugen über die Complexen Zahlen, p.1687

H. Helmholtz, , 1868.

, Ueber die Thatsachen, die der Geometrie zum Grunde liegen. Nachrichten von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, vol.9, pp.193-221

H. Helmoltz and . Von, , 1887.

. Zählen-und-messen, Philosophische Aufsätze, Eduard Zeller zu seinem fünfzigjährigen Doctorjubiläum gewidmet, pp.17-52

O. Hölder, , 1901.

, Die Axiome der Quantität und die Lehre vom Mass. Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, mathematisch-physischen Classe, vol.53, pp.1-64

R. Jeshion, , 2001.

, Frege's Notions of Self-Evidence. Mind, vol.110, pp.937-976

I. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, 1998.

P. Kitcher, , 1979.

. Frege's-epistemology, Philosophical Review, vol.88, issue.2, pp.235-262

D. H. Krantz, R. D. Luce, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky, , 1971.

, Foundations of Measurement, vol.3

F. Kutschera and . Von, , 1966.

, Freges begründung der analysis. Archiv für mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung, vol.9, pp.102-111

J. Macfarlane, , 2002.

K. Frege and . The-logic-in-logicism, The Philosophical Review, vol.111, issue.1, pp.25-65

P. Mccallion, , 2016.

, On Frege's Applications Constraint, Abstractionism: Essays in Philosophy of Mathematics, pp.311-322

H. Menge, , 1846.

. B. Euclidis-data and L. Tuebneri,

J. S. Mill,

, A System Of Logic, Ratiocinative And Inductive

. Longmans, R. Green, and D. , , vol.2, p.1872

J. Mill, In's Deutsche überetragen von J. Schiel. Vierte deutsche nach der Achten des Originals erweiterte Auflage, vol.2, p.1877

M. Panza, Abstraction and Epistemic Economy, Early Analytic Philosophy. New Perspective on the Tradition, pp.387-428, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01131191

M. Panza,

, Was Frege a Logicist for Arithmetic, Eva Picardi on Language, Analysis and History, 2018.

C. Peacocke, Magnitudes: Metaphysics, Explanation, and Perception, Mind, Language and Action: Proceedings of the 36 th International Wittgenstein Symposium, pp.357-387, 2015.

B. Riemann, Ueber die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen, Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellshaft der Wissenshaften zu Göttingen, vol.13, pp.133-150

B. Riemann,

B. Riemann, On the Hypotheses Which Lie at the Bases of Geometry, 2016.

B. Russell, , 1903.

, The Principles of Mathematics

B. Russell and A. N. Whitehead, , 1910.

P. Mathematica, , vol.3

A. Sereni, On the Philosophical Significance of Frege's Constraint

S. Shapiro, Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology. Number 2, 1997.

S. Shapiro, , 2000.

, Frege Meets Dedekind: A Neologicist Treatment of Real Analysis, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol.4, pp.317-421

S. Shapiro, , 2009.

, We Hold These Truths to Be Self-Evident: But What Do We Mean by That? Review of Symbolic Logic, vol.2, pp.175-207

P. Simons, , 1987.

, Frege's Theory of Real Numbers, History and Philosophy of Logic, vol.8, pp.358-383, 1995.

E. Snyder, R. Samuels, and S. Shapiro, Neologicism, Frege's Constraint, and the Frege-Heck Condition Noûs, 2018.

M. Steiner, , 1998.

, The Applicability of Mathematics as a Philosophical Problem

M. Steiner, Mathematics: Application and Applicability, Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic, pp.625-650, 2005.

C. M. Taisbak, , 2003.

?. , Euclid's Data or The Importance of Being Given

J. Weiner, , 1984.

, The Philosopher Behind the Last Lsogicist. Philosophical Quarterly, vol.34, issue.136, pp.242-264

J. Weiner, Frege in Perspective, 1990.

C. Wright, , 2000.

. Neo-fregean, Foundations for Real Analysis: Some Reflections on Frege's Constraint, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol.41, issue.4, pp.317-334