Comparing Words to Debate about Drinking Water: Textometrics for Argumentation Studies

Abstract : In ten videotaped socio-scientific debates related to water, students from Mexico, the USA and France tend to focus on few alternative positions. On the basis of Grize's definition of schematization, we followed their reasoning by studying how they put light on specific aspects of the discursive object 'water'. Through textometrical analysis of debate transcripts, we specified 6 characteristics of 'water' that are more or less emphasized depending on the prevailing national argumentative scenario.
Type de document :
Communication dans un congrès
1st European Conference on Argumentation, Jun 2015, Lisbon, Portugal
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01871646
Contributeur : Claire Polo <>
Soumis le : mardi 11 septembre 2018 - 10:26:30
Dernière modification le : samedi 3 novembre 2018 - 16:47:09
Document(s) archivé(s) le : mercredi 12 décembre 2018 - 13:33:50

Fichier

ECA15RP_PoloPlantinLundNiccola...
Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : halshs-01871646, version 1

Collections

Citation

Claire Polo, Christian Plantin, Kristine Lund, Gerald P. Niccolai. Comparing Words to Debate about Drinking Water: Textometrics for Argumentation Studies. 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Jun 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. 〈halshs-01871646〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

16

Téléchargements de fichiers

12