Fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth: evidence from state-level cross-section data for the United States, Journal of Urban Economics, vol.52, issue.1, pp.93-108, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00018-9
Public Expenditure Decentralizatlon In Developing Countries, Gov. Policy, vol.4, 1986. ,
Decentralization and efficiency of local government, The Annals of Regional Science, vol.12, issue.1, pp.571-601, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1080/03003930008433988
On the determinants of local government performance: A two-stage nonparametric approach, European Economic Review, vol.51, issue.2, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.01.007
Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science, vol.30, issue.9, pp.1078-1092, 1984. ,
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
Decentralizing antipoverty program delivery in developing countries, Journal of Public Economics, vol.89, issue.4, pp.675-704, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.01.001
Federalism with and without political centralization: China versus Russia, NBER Work. Pap. Ser. Fed, 2000. ,
Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments: A comparative analysis of FDH, DEA, and econometric approaches, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol.26, issue.2, pp.26-145, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0166-0462(95)02127-2
Nonparametric frontier estimation: a robust approach, Journal of Econometrics, vol.106, issue.1, pp.1-25, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00080-X
Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.2, issue.6, pp.429-444, 1978. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
Income Distribution and Tax, and Government Social Spending Policies in Developing Countries. IMF Work, 2000. ,
A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program. CEPA Work, pp.1-49, 1996. ,
A comparison of parametric and non-parametric distance functions: With application to European railways, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.117, issue.2, pp.326-339, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00271-9
Conditional nonparametric frontier models for convex and nonconvex technologies: a unifying approach, Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol.139, issue.1, pp.13-32, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4899-3324-9
Fiscal Decentralization and Governance: A Cross- Country Analysis. IMF Work, 2001. ,
Governance, Decentralization and Reform in China, India and Russia, 2000. ,
Growth still is good for the poor, Journal of Economic Growth, vol.7, issue.3, pp.195-225, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1023/A:1020139631000
The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), vol.120, issue.3, pp.10-1016, 1957. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2343100
Is inflation bad for income inequality: The importance of the initial rate of inflation, 2001. ,
Income Inequality, Fiscal Decentralization and Transfer Dependency. IMF Work, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.5089/9781484354711.001
Does government fragmentation enhance or hinder metropolitan economic growth?, Papers in Regional Science, vol.67, issue.3, pp.641-657, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1177/0160323X0003200301
The simultaneous evolution of growth and inequality*, The Economic Journal, vol.1, issue.487, pp.326-344, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1093/jleo/15.1.222
Using least squares and tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.197, issue.2, pp.792-798, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.07.039
Localising Welfare-to-Work? Territorial Flexibility and the New Deal for Young People, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, vol.190, issue.6, pp.911-932, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1080/713691375
Fiscal Federalism, New York Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, vol.6, pp.55-56, 1972. ,
Industrial agglomeration effects in Japan: Productive efficiency, market access, and public fiscal transfer, Papers in Regional Science, vol.40, issue.4, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781139174411
Fractional regression models for second stage DEA efficiency analyses, Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol.25, issue.4, pp.239-255, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.009
The Economic (in)Efficiency of Devolution, Environment and Planning A, vol.46, issue.11, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S1043-951X(01)00043-8
Accountability and decentralisation in government: An incomplete contracts model, European Economic Review, vol.40, issue.1, pp.61-8910, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0014-2921(95)00055-0
The Consequences of Fiscal Decentralization on Poverty and Income Equality, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, vol.2005, issue.2, pp.321-343, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1111/1467-9779.00128
Corruption, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.108, issue.3, pp.599-617, 1993. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2118402
Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes, Journal of Econometrics, vol.136, issue.1, pp.31-64, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.009
Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects, Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, pp.295-316, 1995. ,
Partial frontier efficiency analysis, Stata J, vol.12, pp.461-478, 2012. ,
Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth in High-Income OECD Countries, Fiscal Studies, vol.76, issue.no. 4, pp.237-274, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2003.tb00084.x
A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures, Journal of Political Economy, vol.64, issue.5, pp.416-424, 1956. ,
DOI : 10.1086/257839
Decentralization and the Quality of Government, Polit. Sci, pp.1-48, 2002. ,
Income Inequality, Decentralisation, and Regional Development in Western Europe, Environment and Planning A, vol.79, issue.6, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1068/a44349
Political business cycles at the municipal level, Public Choice, vol.118, issue.3???4, pp.45-64, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s11127-006-9104-2
Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives, Journal of Urban Economics, vol.65, issue.3, pp.279-293, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jue.2008.12.005
Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data 735, 2002. ,