Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

From degrees of belief to binary beliefs: Lessons from judgment-aggregation theory

Abstract : What is the relationship between degrees of belief and binary beliefs? Can the latter be expressed as a function of the former – a so-called “belief-binarization rule” – without running into difficulties such as the lottery paradox? We show that this problem can be usefully analyzed from the perspective of judgment-aggregation theory. Although some formal similarities between belief binarization and judgment aggregation have been noted before, the connection between the two problems has not yet been studied in full generality. We seek to fill this gap. This paper is organized around a baseline impossibility theorem, which we use to map out the space of possible solutions to the belief-binarization problem. Our theorem shows that, except in limiting cases, there exists no belief-binarization rule satisfying four initially plausible desiderata. Surprisingly, this result is a direct corollary of the judgmentaggregation variant of Arrow’s classic impossibility theorem in social choice theory.
Complete list of metadatas
Contributor : Franz Dietrich <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, March 27, 2018 - 9:44:53 AM
Last modification on : Tuesday, November 17, 2020 - 11:18:17 AM


  • HAL Id : halshs-01744085, version 1



Franz Dietrich, Christian List. From degrees of belief to binary beliefs: Lessons from judgment-aggregation theory. Journal of Philosophy, Journal of Philosophy, 2018, 5, pp.225-270. ⟨halshs-01744085⟩



Record views