Corporate governance in the UK: Is the comply or explain approach working?, International Review of Law and Economics, vol.30, issue.2, pp.193-201, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.irle.2010.03.002
Management-Based Regulation: Prescribing Private Management to Achieve Public Goals, Law <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Society Review, vol.66, issue.4, pp.691-695, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1086/227496
URL : https://repository.library.northeastern.edu/files/neu:330091/fulltext.pdf
Evolutions in Corporate Governance: Towards an Ethical Framework for Business Conduct, 2013. ,
Endogenously Chosen Boards of Directors and Their Monitoring of the CEO, American Economic Review, vol.88, issue.1, pp.96-118, 1998. ,
Comply or explain in corporate governance codes: in need of greater regulatory oversight?, Legal Studies, vol.9, issue.02, pp.279-80, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00524.x
Corporate Law and Self-Regulation, Oxford Handbook on Corporate Law and Governance, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.2574201
URL : http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/61587/1/Corporate%20law%20and%20self-regulation.pdf
King Code of Governance for South Africa, 2009. ,
Corporate governance codes and gender diversity: management-based regulation in action, UNSW Law Journal, vol.39, issue.2, pp.715-740, 2016. ,
Uniformity as response to soft law: Evidence from compliance and non-compliance with the Dutch corporate governance code, Regulation & Governance, vol.16, issue.4, p.480, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00661.x
Comply or Explain " : Market Discipline and Non-compliance with the Combined Code', Corporate Governance: An International Review, pp.486-492, 2006. ,
« Introduction », Soft law in governance and regulation: an interdisciplinary analysis, 2005. ,
The chemistry of governance: a catalyst for change, Corporate Governance Review, 2012. ,
A review of corporate governance in UK banks and other financial industry entities ? Final recommendations, 2009. ,
disponible sur : http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/24673/1/dp581_Corporate_Governance_at_LSE_001.pdf. V. aussi P. Durand-Barthez, « Le principe « appliquer ou expliquer ». Réflexions sur ses fondements et sa mise en oeuvre dans le domaine du gouvernement d'entreprise, p.29, 2005. ,
« 'Comply or Explain' Guide pratique de mise en oeuvre, Institut Français des Administrateurs (IFA) disponible sur, 2013. ,
The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey, Journal of Economic Literature, vol.481, pp.58-107, 2010. ,
A Theory of Friendly Boards, The Journal of Finance, vol.4, issue.1, pp.217-250, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0929-1199(97)00009-6
Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter?, Management Science, vol.582, pp.219-235, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1475152
URL : http://repositori.upf.edu/bitstream/10230/5605/1/1172.pdf
Codes of Good Governance, Corporate Governance: An International Review, vol.16, issue.4, pp.376-387, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4615-5185-0
A theory of social customs, of which unemployment may be one consequence, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.944, pp.749-775, 1980. ,
Corporate governance in the UK: Is the comply or explain approach working?, International Review of Law and Economics, vol.30, issue.2, pp.193-201, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.irle.2010.03.002
Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.28, issue.3, pp.289-310, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0167-2681(95)00037-2
Merchant Law in a Merchant Court: Rethinking the Code's Search for Immanent Business Norms, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol.144, issue.5, p.1765, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.2307/3312639
Incentives and Prosocial Behavior, American Economic Review, vol.96, issue.5, pp.1652-1678, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1257/aer.96.5.1652
A Theory of Conformity, Journal of Political Economy, vol.102, issue.5, pp.841-877, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1086/261957
A Simple Model of Herd Behavior, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.107, issue.3, pp.797-817, 1992. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2118364
Pay without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation, 2004. ,
Corporate codes of conduct: Economic determinants and legal implications for independent auditors, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, vol.12, issue.1, pp.3-35, 1993. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0278-4254(93)90003-T
The Law Merchants Story: How Romantic Is It?, 2012. ,
Does Compliance with the German Corporate Governance Code Have an Impact on Stock Valuation? An empirical analysis, Corporate Governance: An International Review, vol.55, issue.5, pp.432-445, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF03372722
Coordination, Commitment, and Enforcement: The Case of the Merchant Guild, Journal of Political Economy, vol.102, issue.4, pp.745-776, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1086/261953
Les instruments volontaires??:, Revue internationale de droit ??conomique, vol.4, issue.4, pp.461-481, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.3917/ride.184.0461
What Is Law? A Coordination Model of the Characteristics of Legal Order, Journal of Legal Analysis, vol.16, issue.5781, p.471, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s12110-005-1000-9
Law without the State, Journal of Law and Courts, vol.1, issue.1, pp.3-34, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1086/668604
Endogenously Chosen Boards of Directors and Their Monitoring of the CEO, American Economic Review, vol.88, issue.1, pp.96-118, 1998. ,
Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and International Regulation, American Journal of Comparative Law, vol.6, issue.4, pp.1-73, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.2307/796256
Remuneration: Where We've Been, How We Got to Here, What are the Problems, and How to Fix Them, Harvard NOM Working Paper, pp.4-28, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.561305
Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Business Ethics, vol.88, issue.2, pp.351-383, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.05.008
What Do Alternative Sanctions Mean?, The University of Chicago Law Review, vol.63, issue.2, pp.591-653, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1600237
URL : http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1113&context=fss_papers
Shaming White???Collar Criminals: A Proposal for Reform of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, The Journal of Law and Economics, vol.42, issue.S1, pp.365-391, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1086/467429
General Characteristics of Rules, IX : Production of Legal Rules, Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, pp.502-528, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.4337/9781782540519.00008
Non-Mandatory Approaches to Environmental Protection, Journal of Economic Surveys, vol.15, issue.3, pp.291-324, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1111/1467-6419.00141
EPA's Voluntary 33/50 Program: Impact on Toxic Releases and Economic Performance of Firms, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.37, issue.1, pp.1-25, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1998.1057
Firm Performance and Board Committee Structure, The Journal of Law and Economics, vol.41, issue.1, pp.275-303, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1086/467391
458, note M. Menjucq. 185 H. Synvet, op. cit., n° 40 s. 186 V. not. CJCE, 9 mars 1999, aff. C-212, E, vol.28497, issue.491, 1999. ,
Women on boards: The superheroes of tomorrow?, The Leadership Quarterly, vol.27, issue.3, pp.371-386 ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.11.001
The Changing of the Boards: The Impact on Firm Valuation of Mandated Female Board Representation *, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.40, issue.1, pp.137-197, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5
Mandatory Gender Balance and Board Independence, European Financial Management, vol.40, issue.2, pp.3-30, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5
A Female Style in Corporate Leadership? Evidence from Quotas, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, vol.5, issue.3, pp.136-69, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1257/app.5.3.136
entreprise est un « acte règlementaire de droit privé » (cf. Cass. soc. 25 septembre Bull. V, n°381), en droit des sociétés, la situation est variable selon qu'il s'agit du règlement intérieur de la société, ou de celui des organes de direction, selon qu'il est, ou non, intégré aux statuts, etc. Le plus souvent toutefois, on consi dère qu'il a une valeur « infra statutaire, Pactes, statuts, règlement intérieur : quelle hiérarchie », Rev. Stés, pp.87-129, 1986. ,
1 ; plus généralement, sur le sujet, v. Ph. Néau Leduc, La réglementation de droit privé, 1994. ,
Approche et meilleures pratiques, p.15 ,
MEDEF de gouvernement d'entreprise des sociétés cotées », Rev. Stés. 2011 ? p. 395, n°14 ; pour des exemples, v., not., Com. 9 mars, Bull. civ. IV, 2010. ,
4 Les clients : les vrais patrons de l'entreprise 2.5 Les employés : les premiers clients de l'entreprise 2.6 Les concurrents : éthique et déontologie 3 Qualité et diffusion de l'information Table des matières INTRODUCTION, L'assemblée générale des actionnaires 1.2 Le conseil d'administration 1.3 La direction 2 Les relations de l'entreprise avec les parties prenantes externes 2.1 Les pouvoirs publics comme partenaires 2.2 Les banques et autres institutions financières : confiance et transparence 2.3 Les fournisseurs : pour une collaboration durable 2, p.11 ,
23 ? 1er axe de recherche : Quel(s) modèle(s) d e gouvernance ?23 ? 2ème axe de recherche : Quelle effectivité d es codes de gouvernan ce ? recherche : Pour quelle(s) gouvernance(s) ?, p.28 ,
Les ins ti tutions en charge du sui vi de l'effecti vi té des codes : pra tiques et préroga ti ves 64 1.2. Des i nstruments de mesure de la mise en application des codes qui reflètent une asymétrie entre comply et explain, 1.1. Des suivis s ans contrôles : l es institutions................................ 67 1.2.2. La faiblesse du Explain : l 'absence de mesures pa r manque de normalisation de l'i nforma tion, p.71 ,
de la s ynthèse des informa tions fournies et des mesures, p.79 ,
111 1.2.2. Controverse 2 : rôle et composition du conseil d'a dminis tra tion 112 1.2.3. Evol uti ons paradigmatique et codes de gouvernance : une analyse des exemples britannique et français, p.116 ,
L'adaptabili té des codes : flexibilité vs insécuri té juridi que, p.127 ,
129 2.3. Le code comme mode de production d'un bien collectif, p.131 ,
217 5.2. Quel effet du quota législatif s ur l es ca ractéristiques des femmes recrutées dans l es conseils français ? Une compa raison a vec les effets du code bri tannique, Quel s effets du quota l égislatif sur l es grands équilibres des conseils français ? Une comparaison avec les effets du code, p.219 ,
251 2.2. Jus tifier et rendre compte : quelle(s) di fférence(s ) ?, p.260 ,