D. W. Aksnes and R. E. Taxt, Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university, Research Evaluation, vol.13, issue.1, pp.33-41, 2004.
DOI : 10.3152/147154404781776563

J. K. Alexander, M. Lecoutre, and R. F. Scherer, A Global Comparison of Business Journal Ranking Systems, Journal of Education for Business, vol.82, issue.6, pp.321-328, 2007.
DOI : 10.3200/JOEB.82.6.321-328

O. Auranen and M. Nieminen, « University research funding and publication performance ? An international comparison », Research Policy, pp.822-834, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.003

J. Bollen, H. Van-de-sompel, A. Hagberg, and R. Chute, A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures, Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures, pp.6022-6022, 2009.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0006022.s001

B. Brock-utne, Language of Instruction and Research in Higher Education in Europe: Highlights from the Current Debate in Norway and Sweden, International Review of Education, vol.47, issue.3, pp.367-388, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s11159-007-9051-2

W. Bruneau and D. Savage, Counting Out the Scholars: How Performance Indicators Undermine Universities and Colleges, 2002.

I. Bruno, Petite histoire d'une technologie de gouvernement », Revue d'Histoire Moderne et Contemporaine, La recherche scientifique au crible du benchmarking, pp.28-45, 2008.

L. Butler, What Happens When Funding is Linked to Publication Counts?, Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, pp.389-405, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_18

B. Cronin and C. R. Sugimoto, Scholarly Metrics Under the Microscope: From Citation Analysis to Academic Auditing, 2015.

C. Donovan, The Governance of Social Science and Everyday Epistemology, Public Administration, vol.7, issue.3, pp.597-615, 2005.
DOI : 10.5153/sro.755

R. Encinas-de-munagorri, Quel statut pour l'expert ? », Revue Française d'Administration Publique, pp.379-389, 2002.

Y. Gendron, Constituting the Academic Performer: The Spectre of Superficiality and Stagnation in Academia, European Accounting Review, vol.53, issue.1, pp.97-127, 2008.
DOI : 10.1080/0307507032000058127

M. W. Giles and G. C. Wright, « Political scientists' evaluations of sixty-three journals, Political Science, vol.8, issue.3, pp.254-256, 1975.

N. E. Gilhus and G. Sivertsen, Publishing affects funding in neurology, European Journal of Neurology, vol.199, issue.1, pp.147-151, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.03.023

J. Gläser, Why are the Most Influential Books in Australian Sociology not Necessarily the Most Highly Cited Ones?, Journal of Sociology, vol.50, issue.3, pp.261-282, 2004.
DOI : 10.1086/603393

N. D. Glenn, American sociologists' evaluation of sixty-three journals, American Sociologist, vol.6, issue.4, pp.298-303, 1971.

D. Hicks, The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences, Scientometrics, vol.41, issue.1???2, pp.193-215, 1999.
DOI : 10.1093/rev/7.1.2

D. Hicks, Performance-based university research funding systems, Research Policy, vol.41, issue.2, pp.251-261
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007
URL : http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article%3D1027%26context%3Ddiana_hicks

D. Hicks and J. Wang, Coverage and overlap of the new social sciences and humanities journal lists, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol.35, issue.3, pp.284-294, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02016909

J. L. Johnson and P. M. Podsakoff, JOURNAL INFLUENCE IN THE FIELD OF MANAGEMENT: AN ANALYSIS USING SALANCIK'S INDEX IN A DEPENDENCY NETWORK., Academy of Management Journal, vol.37, issue.5, pp.1392-1407, 1994.
DOI : 10.2307/256679

M. Lamont, How Professors Think : Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment, 2009.
DOI : 10.4159/9780674054158

C. Lemercier, « Classer les revues de sciences humaines et sociales : comment ? pour quoi ?, 2010.

M. Lillka?-ll, Evaluation of Journal Ranking for Research Evaluation Purposes in the Social Sciences, Royal School of Library and Information Science, 2009.

D. Merllié, La machine de l'AERES ?? classer les revues de philosophie., démontage statistique », Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'Étranger, pp.91-99, 2009.
DOI : 10.3917/rphi.091.0091

R. K. Merton, The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered, The Matthew effect in science, pp.56-63, 1968.
DOI : 10.1126/science.159.3810.56

W. J. Moore, THE RELATIVE QUALITY OF ECONOMICS JOURNALS: A SUGGESTED RATING SYSTEM, Economic Inquiry, vol.51, issue.2, pp.156-169, 1972.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1972.tb01596.x

M. J. Polonsky, G. Jones, and M. J. Kearsley, Accessibility: An Alternative Method of Ranking Marketing Journals?, Journal of Marketing Education, vol.60, issue.4, pp.181-193, 1999.
DOI : 10.1080/10696679.1995.11501689

J. Pons-novell and D. Tirado-fabregat, Is there life beyond the ISI Journal lists? The international impact of Spanish, Italian, French and German economics journals, Applied Economics, vol.12, issue.6, pp.689-699, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.09.011
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00582057

D. Pontille and D. Torny, The controversial policies of journal ratings: evaluating social sciences and humanities, Research Evaluation, vol.19, issue.5, pp.347-360, 2010.
DOI : 10.3152/095820210X12809191250889
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00568746

D. Pontille and D. Torny, 2012, « Rendre publique l'évaluation des SHS : les controverses sur les listes de revues de l, AERES », Quaderni, vol.77, pp.11-24
DOI : 10.4000/quaderni.542

D. Pontille and D. Torny, 2015, « From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of, Journal Peer Review » Human Studies, vol.38, issue.1, pp.57-79

A. Pritchard, « Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics?, Journal of Documentation, vol.25, issue.4, pp.348-349, 1969.

M. P. Power, The Audit Society : Rituals of Verification, 1997.

M. Rocha-e-silva, « Impact factor, SCImago indexes and the Brazilian journal rating system: where do we go from here?, Clinics, vol.4, pp.65-351, 2010.

U. Sandstro?-m and E. Sandstro?-m, The field factor: towards a metric for academic institutions, Research Evaluation, vol.18, issue.3, pp.243-250, 2009.
DOI : 10.3152/095820209X466892

G. Sivertsen, Experiences with a bibliometric model for performance based funding of research institutions », Excellence and Emergence. A New Challenge for the Combination of Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches, Book of Abstracts, 10th International conference on science & technology indocators, pp.126-128, 2008.

G. Sivertsen, « A performance indicator based on complete data for the scientific publication output at research institutions, International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics Newsletter, vol.6, issue.1, pp.22-28, 2009.

G. Sivertsen, 2016, « Publication-based funding: the Norwegian model
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_7
URL : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_7

M. D. Steward and B. R. Lewis, A Comprehensive Analysis of Marketing Journal Rankings, Journal of Marketing Education, vol.28, issue.2, pp.75-92, 2010.
DOI : 10.1080/00913367.1999.10673583

D. J. Svantesson, International ranking of law journals ??? can it be done and at what cost?, Legal Studies, vol.15, issue.04, pp.678-691, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-6478.00137

J. Wilsdon, The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management, Higher Education Funding Council for England, 2015.

H. A. Zuckerman and R. K. Merton, Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system, Minerva, vol.9, issue.1, pp.66-100, 1971.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01553188