The Measurement of Consensus in Social Choice: an axiomatic analysis, 2008. ,
Assent-maximizing social choice, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.35, issue.2, pp.439-460, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1137/0135023
Causes and consequences of polarization Political Negotiation: A Handbook, 2015. ,
Characterizations on voting rules and consensus measures, 2006. ,
Measuring polarization in preferences, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.78, pp.76-79, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2015.09.006
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01457336
Judgment Aggregation under Issue Dependencies, AAAI, pp.468-474, 2016. ,
Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?, American Journal of Sociology, vol.102, issue.3, pp.690-755, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1086/230995
On the Measurement of Polarization, Econometrica, vol.62, issue.4, pp.819-851, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2951734
Measuring Consensus in Weak Orders, Consensual Processes, pp.213-234, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-20533-0_13
Unravelling in two-sided matching markets and similarity of preferences, Games and Economic Behavior, vol.69, issue.2, pp.365-393, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.geb.2009.11.009
Measuring diversity of preferences in a group, Proceedings of the Twenty-first European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp.423-428, 2014. ,
Turned off or turned on? How polarization affects political engagement, pp.1-33, 2008. ,
Preference Diversity Orderings, Group Decision and Negotiation, vol.46, issue.3, pp.1-22, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-015-0930-3
URL : http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/20378/1/karpov_2016_dp610.pdf
Voting rules, manipulability and social homogeneity, Public Choice, vol.116, issue.1/2, pp.165-184, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1023/A:1024221816507
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00069239
Forthcoming): " Democratic Deliberation and Social Choice: A Review, Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy ,