P. Béguin and P. Rabardel, Designing for instrument-mediated activity. Scandinavian journal of information systems, pp.173-190, 2000.

P. Becker and J. Morawetz, Impacts of health and safety education: Comparison of worker activities before and after training, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, vol.33, issue.1, pp.63-70, 2004.
DOI : 10.2190/NS6.3.i

M. Bourrier, Le nucléaire à l'épreuve de l'organisation, 1999.

M. J. Burke, M. L. Scheuer, and R. J. Meredith, A dialogical approach to skill development: The case of safety skills, Human Resource Management Review, vol.17, issue.2, pp.235-250, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.04.004

S. Caens-martin, Concevoir un simulateur pour apprendre à gérer un système vivant à des fins de production : la taille de la vigne, Apprendre par la simulation, 2005.

S. Caroly and A. Fassina, How do different approaches to collective activity in service relations call into question the plurality of ergonomic activity models? @ctivités, pp.85-98, 2007.

C. Chia-feng, L. Yua-yuan, and L. Mohamad, Flow diagram analysis of electrical fatalities in construction industry, Safety Science, vol.50, issue.5, pp.1205-1214, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.12.012

G. Cornu, Vocabulaire juridique, 2005.

F. Daniellou, The French-speaking ergonomists' approach to work activity: cross-influences of field intervention and conceptual models, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, vol.50, issue.5, pp.409-427, 2005.
DOI : 10.1080/00140137208924462

C. Delgoulet, D. Cau-bareille, C. Chatigny, C. Gaudart, M. Santos et al., Work, special issueErgonomic Work Analysis and Training, p.41, 2012.

S. W. Dekker, When human error becomes a crime, Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, vol.3, issue.1, pp.83-92, 2003.

S. W. Dekker, Failure to adapt or adaptations that fail: contrasting models on procedures and safety, Applied Ergonomics, vol.34, issue.3, pp.233-238, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00031-0

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.606.3361

J. Faverge, Psychosociologie des accidents du travail, 1967.

J. Faverge, L'homme agent de fiabilité et d'infiabilité dans les systèmes complexes, 1970.

M. Ferreira, La conduite d'engin. Travail et sécurité, pp.46-49, 2010.

L. Filliettaz and S. Billett, Francophone perspectives of learning through work, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-18669-6

J. K. Ford and S. Fisher, The transfer of safety training in work organizations: A systems perspective to continuous learning, Occupational medecine, vol.9, issue.2, pp.241-259, 1994.

C. Gaudin and S. Chaliès, Anwendung der Videoressourcen in der Grundausbildung angehender Lehrer, Revue fran??aise de p??dagogie, vol.178, issue.178, pp.115-130, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.015

A. R. Hale, Safety rules o.k.?, Journal of Occupational Accidents, vol.12, issue.1-3, pp.3-20, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/0376-6349(90)90061-Y

A. R. Hale and D. Boris, Working to rule, or working safely? Part 1: A state of the art review, Safety Science, vol.55, pp.207-221, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.011

A. R. Hale and P. Swuste, Safety rules: procedural freedom or action constraint?, Safety Science, vol.29, issue.3, pp.163-177, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0925-7535(98)00020-4

E. Hollnagel, D. D. Woods, and N. Leveson, Resilience Engineering: Concepts & Precepts, 2006.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00572766

E. Hollnagel, J. Leonhardt, T. Licu, and S. Shorrock, From Safety-I to Safety-II: A White Paper, 2013.

C. A. Janicak, Occupational fatalities due to electrocutions in the construction industry, Journal of Safety Research, vol.39, issue.6, pp.617-621, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jsr.2008.10.007

T. D. Jink, Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.24, issue.4, pp.602-61, 1979.

J. D. Koustellis, S. D. Anagnostatos, C. D. Halevidis, F. S. Karagrigoriou, A. D. Polykrati et al., Contact of heavy vehicles with overhead power lines, Safety Science, vol.49, issue.6, pp.951-955, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.02.011

M. Laberge, H. Maceachen, and B. Calvet, Why are occupational health and safety training approaches not effective? Understanding young worker learning processes using an ergonomic lens, Safety Science, vol.68, pp.250-257, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.012

URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.012

M. Lacomblez, M. Bellemare, C. Chatigny, C. Delgoulet, A. Re et al., Ergonomic Analysis of Work Activity and Training: Basic Paradigm, Evolutions and Challenges, Meeting diversity in ergonomics, pp.129-142, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-008045373-6/50009-X

A. Leontiev, Activity, Consciousness and Personality, 1978.

J. Leplat, About implementation of safety rules, Safety Science, vol.29, issue.3, pp.189-204, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0925-7535(98)00022-8

J. Leplat, Repères pour l'analyse de l'activité en ergonomie, 2008.
DOI : 10.3917/puf.lepla.2008.01

V. Mollo and P. Falzon, Auto- and allo-confrontation as tools for reflective activities, Applied Ergonomics, vol.35, issue.6, pp.531-540, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.06.003

V. Mollo and A. Nascimento, Design projects as opportunities for the development of activities, Constructive Ergonomics, pp.187-204, 2014.

G. Munoz, C. Vidal-gomel, and G. Bourmaud, The Operators??? System of Instruments: A Risk Management Tool, Risk and Cognition, pp.229-246, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-662-45704-7_9

A. Nascimento, L. Cuvelier, V. Mollo, A. Dicioccio, and P. Falzon, Constructing safety: from the normative to the adaptative view Boca Raton (FL), Constructive ergonomics, pp.95-110, 2014.
DOI : 10.1201/b17456-9

J. Paques, Crane accidents by contact with powerlines, Safety Science, vol.16, issue.2, pp.129-142, 1993.
DOI : 10.1016/0925-7535(93)90010-B

P. Rabardel, Les hommes et les technologies Une approche cognitive des instruments contemporains, 1995.

J. Reason, Human error, 1990.

J. Rogalski, Epistemology and cognitive task Cognitive systems (European Society for the Study of Cognitive Systems, pp.135-150, 2004.

R. Samurçay, Conceptual models for training », Cognition and human-computer cooperation, pp.107-124, 1995.

R. Samurçay and J. Hoc, Causal versus topographical supports for diagnosis in dynamic situations, Le Travail Humain, vol.59, pp.45-68, 1996.

R. Samurçay and J. Rogalski, Exploitation didactique des situations de simulation, Le Travail Humain, vol.61, pp.333-359, 1998.

D. A. Schon, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, vol.34, issue.3, 1983.
DOI : 10.1080/07377366.1986.10401080

G. Terssac, L'autonomie dans le travail, 1992.

C. Vidal-gomel, P. Olry, and Y. Rachedi, Os riscos profissionais e a sua gestão em contexto : dois objectos para um objectivo de formação comum, Laboreal, issue.2, pp.31-47, 2009.

C. Vidal-gomel, P. Olry, D. Lanoë, and H. Jeanmougin, La livraison de béton : système de travail et prévention des risques professionnels Ergonomie des produits et des services Saint-Malo: 5-7 septembre, Actes du 32 e congrès de la SELF, pp.655-665, 2007.

C. Vidal-gomel and J. Rogalski, La conceptualisation et la place des concepts pragmatiques dans l'activité professionnelle et le développement des competences. @ctivités, pp.49-84, 2007.
DOI : 10.4000/activites.1401

C. Vidal-gomel and R. Samurçay, Spécification de situations didactiques pour le développement des modèles opératoires du risque dans le domaine de la formation à l'habilitation électrique. Rapport final, Contrat INRS-université Paris-8, 2000.

C. Vidal-gomel and R. Samurçay, Qualitative analyses of accidents and incidents to identify competencies. The electrical systems maintenance case, Safety Science, vol.40, issue.6, pp.479-500, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0925-7535(01)00016-9

C. Vidal-gomel, Comp??tences pour g??rer les risques professionnels??: un exemple dans le domaine de la maintenance des syst??mes ??lectriques, Le travail humain, vol.70, issue.2, pp.153-194, 2007.
DOI : 10.3917/th.702.0153