J. Adams, SOME NEGLECTED EVIDENCE FOR LATIN HABEO WITH INFINITIVE: THE ORDER OF THE CONSTITUENTS, Transactions of the Philological Society, vol.2, issue.3, pp.131-96, 1991.
DOI : 10.1016/0024-3841(70)90073-2

J. Adams, Wackernagel's Law and the Placement of the Copula esse in Classical Latin, 1994.

J. Adams, Social Variation and the Latin language, 2013.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511843433

V. Bourova, A la recherche du 'conditionnel latin': les constructions 'infinitif + forme de habere' examinées à partir d'un corpus électronique, Romanistische Korpuslinguistik: Korpora und diachrone Sprachwissenschaft, pp.303-319, 2005.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110923582.461

. Bourova, L. Viara, and . Tasmowski, La préhistoire des futurs romans: ordre des constituants et sémantique Etudes sémantiques et pragmatiques sur le temps, l'aspect et la modalité (= Cahiers Chronos 19) Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp.25-41, 2007.

A. Cardinaletti and M. Starke, The Typology of Structural Deficiency: a Case Study of the three Grammatical Classes, Clitics in the languages of Europe, pp.145-233, 1999.

M. Cennamo, On the Reorganization of Voice Distinctions and Grammatical Relations in Late Latin, De lingua latina novae quaestiones, pp.51-65, 2001.

M. Cennamo, Passive Auxiliaries in Late Latin Latin et langues romanes: études de linguistique offertes à József Herman à l'occasion de son 80ème anniversaire, pp.177-94, 2005.

G. Cinque, Adverbs and Functional Heads: a Cross-linguistic Perspective, 1999.

J. Clackson and G. Horrocks, The Blackwell History of the Latin Language, 2007.

P. Clancy, The rise of the synthetic future tense in Romance: a critique of some recent hypotheses, pp.545-54, 1975.

R. Coleman, The Origin and Development of Latin Habeo+Infinitive, The Classical Quarterly, vol.2, issue.01, pp.215-247, 1971.
DOI : 10.1016/0024-3841(68)90139-3

R. Coleman, Further Observations on Habeo + Infinitive as an Exponent of Futurity, The Classical Quarterly, vol.26, issue.01, pp.151-160, 1976.
DOI : 10.1017/S0009838800033930

L. Danckaert, Latin Embedded Clauses: the Left Periphery, 2012.
DOI : 10.1075/la.184

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01532838

L. Danckaert, The derivation of Classical Latin Aux-final clauses, pp.141-59, 2014.
DOI : 10.1002/9780470996591.ch75

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01532851

L. Danckaert, Assessing Phonological Correlates of Syntactic Change: the Case of Late Latin BE-periphrases, 2015.

L. Danckaert, Variation and Change in Latin BE-periphrases: Empirical and Methodological Considerations Early and Late Latin: Continuity or Change?, pp.132-62, 2016.
DOI : 10.1017/cbo9781316450826.007

L. Danckaert, The Development of Latin Clause Structure: A Study of the Extended Verb Phrase, 2017.
DOI : 10.1093/oso/9780198759522.001.0001

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01545535

L. Danckaert, The Decline of Latin VOAux: Neg-incorporation and Syntactic Reanalysis, Word Order Change

W. De-melo, Kury??owicz's first ???law of analogy??? and the development of passive periphrases in Latin, Laws and Rules in Indo- European, pp.83-101, 2012.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199609925.003.0006

I. Duarte and G. Matos, Romance Clitics and the Minimalist Program, Portuguese Synta Oxford, pp.116-158, 2000.

D. Embick, Features, Syntax, and Categories in the Latin Perfect, Linguistic Inquiry, vol.16, issue.2, pp.185-230, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/0024-3841(61)90069-9

P. Flobert, Les verbes déponents latins des origines à Charlemagne, 1975.

C. Gianollo, 'I verbi deponenti latini e l'unità della flessione in -r', in Incontri Triestini di Filologia Classica VIII, pp.23-49, 2008.

A. Halpern and J. Fontana, X° and X max Clitics, West Coast Conference in Formal Linguistics, pp.251-66, 1994.

M. Harris, The Evolution of French Syntax: a Comparative Approach, 1978.

G. Haverling, On the development of actionality, tense, and viewpoint from Early to Late Latin, Interdependence of Diachronic and Synchronic Analyses, pp.73-104, 2008.
DOI : 10.1075/slcs.103.06hav

G. Haverling, Actionality, Tense and Viewpoint, New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax Constituent Syntax: Adverbial Phrases, pp.277-523, 2010.
DOI : 10.1075/slcs.103.06hav

J. Herman, La disparition du passif synthétique latin: nouvel essai sur l'écrit et le parlé en latin mérovingien, Estudis romànics, vol.24, pp.31-46, 2002.

J. Hewson, From Latin to Modern Romance, Tense and Aspect in Indo-European languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp.314-344, 1997.
DOI : 10.1075/cilt.280.16hew

B. Hyde, Extrametricality and Non-finality', in M The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, pp.1027-51, 2011.

R. Kühner and K. Stegmann, Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache, 1966.

A. Ledgeway, 'I tempi sovraccomposti nel napoletano antico', L'Italia dialettale, pp.105-129, 1997.

A. Ledgeway, From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic Typology and Change, 2012.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584376.001.0001

DOI : 10.1515/prbs.1991.3.3.237

M. Leumann, 'Part. perf. pass. mit fui im späteren Latein, Glotta, vol.11, pp.192-196, 1921.

H. Muller and . François, The Passive Voice in Vulgar Latin, The Romanic Review, vol.15, pp.68-93, 1924.

M. Nespor and I. Vogel, Prosodic Phonology (with a New Foreword), 1986.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110977790

G. Pezzini, Contraction of EST in Latin, Transactions of the Philological Society, vol.60, issue.3, pp.327-370, 2011.
DOI : 10.2307/294876

H. Pinkster, The Development of Future Tense Auxiliaries in Latin, Glotta, vol.63, pp.186-208, 1985.

I. Roberts, A FORMAL ACCOUNT OF GRAMMATICALISATION IN THE HISTORY OF ROMANCE FUTURES, Folia Linguistica Historica, vol.4, issue.Historica vol. 13,1-2, pp.219-58, 1992.
DOI : 10.1515/tlir.1985.4.3.203

G. Rohlfs, Das romanische habeo-Futurum und Konditionalis, Archivum Romanicum, vol.6, pp.105-52, 1922.

E. Selkirk, Prosodic Domains in Phonology: Sanskrit Revisited Juncture: a Collection of Original Papers, Anma Libri, pp.107-136, 1980.

E. Selkirk, Phonology and Syntax: the Relation between Sound and Structure, Cambridge (Mass, 1984.

M. Starke, Towards elegant parameters: Language variation reduces to the size of lexically???stored trees, Linguistic Variation in the Minimalist Framework, pp.140-52, 2014.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702894.003.0007

H. Stimm, Ein neuer früher Beleg des synthetischen Futurs, Festgabe für Julius Wilhelm zum 80. Geburtstag. Wiesbaden: Steiner, pp.40-52, 1977.

S. Telve, Sul trapassato remoto: valori sintattici, aspettuali e semantici dei tipi fui stato e fui stato amato in italiano antico e moderno, Lingua e Stile, pp.263-94, 2005.

P. Thielmann, Habere mit dem Infinitiv und die Enstehung des romanischen Futurums, Archiv für lateinische Lexikographie und Grammatik, pp.48-89, 1885.

P. Valesio, The romance synthetic future pattern and its first attestations. I, Lingua, vol.20, pp.113-61, 1968.
DOI : 10.1016/0024-3841(68)90139-3

P. Valesio, The synthetic future again: Phonology and morpho-syntax, Lingua, vol.24, pp.181-93, 1970.
DOI : 10.1016/0024-3841(70)90073-2

V. Väänänen, Introduction au latin vulgaire, 19813.

M. Winters, Steps toward the Romance Passive inferrable from the Itinerarium Egeriae, Romance Philology, vol.37, pp.445-54, 1984.

R. Zanuttini, Negation and Clausal Structure: a Comparative Study of Romance Languages, 1997.