M. E. Adkins, The Unblinking Eye Turns to Appellate Law: Cameras in Trial Courtrooms and Their Effect on Appellate Law, Journal of Technology Law & Policy, vol.15, issue.65, pp.63-80, 2010.

C. E. Ares, Chandler v. Florida: Television, Criminal Trials, and Due Process, The Supreme Court Review, vol.1981, pp.157-192, 1981.
DOI : 10.1086/scr.1981.3109543

E. ;. Babcock and K. Johansen, Remote Justice? Expanding the Use of Interactive Video Teleconference in Minnesota Criminal Proceedings, William Mitchell Law Review, vol.37, issue.2, 2011.

R. Badinter and A. Wieviorka, Justice, image, m??moire???, Questions de communication, issue.1, 2002.
DOI : 10.4000/questionsdecommunication.6507

S. Biolley and . De, La vid??o-comparution en Belgique??: une solution sans probl??me, D??viance et Soci??t??, vol.37, issue.3, pp.305-321, 2013.
DOI : 10.3917/ds.373.0305

J. Bossan, La visioconférence dans le procès pénal: un outil à maîtriser, Revue de sciences criminelles, pp.801-816, 2011.

S. Braun, Keep your distance? Remote interpreting in legal proceedings: A critical assessment of a growing practice1, Interpreting International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, vol.15, issue.2, pp.200-228, 2013.
DOI : 10.1075/intp.15.2.03bra

F. Bussy, C. Bragança, and . De, Les images du procès et l'entrée des caméras dans les salles d'audience: dialogue entre un juriste et un réalisateur, LEGICOM, vol.48, issue.1, pp.83-87, 2012.

A. F. Camp, Chandler v. Florida: Cameras, Courts, and the Constitution, Pepperdine Law Review, vol.9, issue.1, pp.165-195, 1982.

J. Coulon, Interview " , Droit & Economie ? Revue de l'association française des docteurs en droit, pp.92-98, 2004.

J. Danet, La justice pénale entre rituel et management, 2010.

S. ;. Diamond, . Bowman, . Locke, . Wong, . Manyee et al., Efficiency and Cost: The Impact of Videoconferenced Hearings on Bail Decisions, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, vol.100, issue.3, p.869, 2010.

L. Dumoulin and C. Licoppe, Innovation, routinisation et gestion de l'impr??vu dans les audiences par visioconf??rence, D??viance et Soci??t??, vol.37, issue.3, pp.323-343, 2013.
DOI : 10.3917/ds.373.0323

L. Dumoulin and C. Licoppe, Videoconferencing, New Public Management, and Organizational Reform in the Judiciary, Policy & Internet, vol.28, issue.4, pp.313-333, 2016.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2006.00222.x
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01420992

H. Epineuse, . Gheorghe, . Oana, and B. Villez, La caméra dans le prétoire: information, transparence, interaction?, Circav, vol.21, pp.149-166, 2010.

N. Feigenson and C. Spiesel, Law on Display: The Digital Transformation of Legal Persuasion and Judgment, 2009.
DOI : 10.18574/nyu/9780814727584.001.0001

A. Garapon, Bien juger. Essai sur le rituel judiciaire, 2001.

M. Garre, Captation vidéo des audiences en Espagne et droit à l'oubli: forces et faiblesses de l'acte électronique, p.100, 2013.

A. Garofano, Avoiding Virtual Justice: Video -teleconference Testimony in Federal Criminal Trials, Catholic University Law Review, vol.56, issue.2, 2007.

P. Garthwaite, Chandler v. Florida: Media in the Courtroom within the Purview of the 14 th Amendment, Grove City College Journal of Law and Public Policy, vol.5, p.47, 2014.

N. Gertner, Videoconferencing: Learning Through Screens Accessed on 06, William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, vol.12, issue.3, 2004.

F. ;. Henning, G. Ng, and . Yein, The Challenge of Collaboration ? ICT Implementation Networks in Courts in The Netherlands, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, vol.5, issue.28, pp.27-44, 2009.

S. Humbert, Cin??ma et proc??s??: l'arriv??e de la cam??ra dans le pr??toire, Histoire de la justice, pp.139-145, 2010.
DOI : 10.3917/rhj.020.0139

G. E. Kodek, Modern Communications and Information Technology and the Taking of Evidence, Electronic Technology and Civil Procedure: New Paths to Justice from around the World, pp.261-278, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-007-4072-3_13

G. Lanzara, . Francesco, and G. Patriotta, Technology and The Courtroom: An Inquiry into Knowledge Making in Organizations, Journal of Management Studies, vol.38, issue.7, pp.943-971, 2001.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-6486.00267

F. I. Lederer, Courtroom Technology: A Status Report Electronic Judicial Resource Management, 2005.

F. I. Lederer, The Legality and Practicality of Remote Witness Testimony The Practical Litigator, pp.19-30, 2009.

S. ;. Machura and P. Robson, Law and Film: Introduction, Journal of Law and Society, vol.28, issue.1, pp.1-8, 2001.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-6478.00174

N. S. Marder, The Conundrum of Cameras in the Courtroom, SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.44, 1489.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.1969115

L. Miniato and M. Flores-lonjou, Le procès dans le cinéma français, Les figures du procès au -delà des frontières, pp.105-135, 2013.

J. Minjoz, Parliamentary Documents, Session of 23, Journal officiel. National Assembly, issue.5353, p.53, 1953.

J. Minjoz, Speech by the rapporteur of the justice and legislation committee, Journal officiel. Fourth Republic, National Assembly, Parliamentary Debates, issue.1, 1954.

C. R. Nesson and A. D. Koblenz, Image of Justice: Chandler vs. Florida, Harvard Civil Rights ? Civil Liberties Law Review, vol.16, pp.405-413, 1981.

P. A. Patterson, Sixth Amendment, Televising Trials, Akron Law Review, vol.15, issue.1, pp.183-190, 1982.

E. G. Porter, Taking Images Seriously, Columbia Law Review, vol.114, issue.7, pp.1687-1782, 2014.

E. Rowden and . Louise, Virtual Courts and Putting 'Summary' Back into 'Summary Justice': Merely Brief, or Unjust? Architecture and Justice: Judicial Meanings in the Public Realm. Farnham: Ashgate, 101 -113, 2013.

A. Salyzyn, A New Lens: Reframing the Conversation about the Use of Video-conferencing in Civil Trials in Ontario, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, vol.50, issue.2, pp.429-463, 2012.

C. Sécail, De la loi du 6 décembre): vers le retour des caméras dans le prétoire?, Le temps des médias, pp.269-284, 1954.

R. K. Sherwin, When Law Goes Pop: The Vanishing Line between Law and Popular Culture, 2000.

R. K. Sherwin, Law in Popular Culture, The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, pp.95-112, 2004.
DOI : 10.1002/9780470693650.ch6

J. Silbey, Patterns of Courtroom Justice, Journal of Law and Society, vol.28, issue.1, pp.97-116, 2001.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-6478.00181

J. Silbey, What We Do When We Do Law and Popular Culture, Law <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Social Inquiry, vol.99, issue.1, pp.139-168, 2002.
DOI : 10.7208/chicago/9780226056043.001.0001

J. Silbey, Judges as Film Critics: New Approaches to Filmic Evidence, pp.493-571, 2004.

S. Sontag-koenig, Intervention de l'avocat et droits de la défense en garde à vue: quel avenir pour les enregistrements audiovisuels?, Actualité juridique pénal, vol.10, pp.527-531, 2012.

D. Stepniak, Technology and Public Access to Audio -visual Coverage and Recordings of Court Proceedings: Implications for Common Law Jurisdictions, William & Mary Bill Rights Journal, vol.12, pp.791-823, 2004.

R. Surette, Media, Crime, and Criminal Justice: Images, Realities, and Policies. 'Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice' Series, 2007.

B. Villez, Television and the Legal System, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01037938

A. Wallace, Virtual Justice in the Bush': The Use of Court Technology in Remote and Regional Australia, Journal of Law, Information and Science, vol.19, pp.1-21, 2008.

E. C. Wiggins, What we Know and What we Need to Know about the Effects of Courtroom Technology, William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, vol.12, p.731, 2003.

E. C. Wiggins, The Courtroom of the Future is Here: Introduction to Emerging Technologies in the Legal System, Law <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Policy, vol.12, issue.2, pp.182-191, 2006.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2006.00222.x