Service interruption on Monday 11 July from 12:30 to 13:00: all the sites of the CCSD (HAL, Epiciences, SciencesConf, AureHAL) will be inaccessible (network hardware connection).
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Book sections

Anatomy, Mechanism and Anthropology. Nicolas Steno’s Reading of L’Homme

Abstract : Nicolas Steno’s criticism of "L’Homme" played a major role in the early reception of Cartesianism: from the late 1660s, the "Discourse on the Anatomy of the Brain" has never ceased being used in order to discredit Descartes’s philosophy. And yet, the anatomical works of Nicolas Steno are themselves informed by Cartesian method. This paradox has led to the depiction of Steno either as a repentant Cartesian or a non-Cartesian mechanist. In this paper, I clarify such problematic labels by studying the different kinds of relationships between anthropology and anatomy that L’Homme may have used to justify. In particular, I show how Descartes’ clock analogy was used to defend two different conceptions of the articulation between anatomical observations and functional hypotheses. The confusion between those two conceptions explain the contradictory claims about the place of anatomy in Descartes’ natural philosophy.
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [43 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Raphaële Andrault Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Sunday, July 12, 2020 - 3:00:25 PM
Last modification on : Sunday, June 26, 2022 - 1:10:41 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Monday, November 30, 2020 - 9:28:30 PM


Files produced by the author(s)



Raphaële Andrault. Anatomy, Mechanism and Anthropology. Nicolas Steno’s Reading of L’Homme. Delphine Antoine; Stephen Gaukroger. Descartes’ Treatise of Man and its reception, 43, Springer, pp.175-192, 2016, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 978-3-319-46989-8. ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-46989-8_11⟩. ⟨halshs-01531880⟩



Record views


Files downloads