La judiciarisation contrastée de la question alévie, de la Turquie à l'Europe

Abstract : The judicialisation of the Alevi issue in three judicial spaces – Turkey, Germany where numerous Alevis have settled, and the ECHR – shows that there is no judicial globalisation, defined as a standardisation of doctrines, case law, and networks of actors on an international scale. In each context, courts are mobilised by various actors for different reasons, and a variety of decisions ensue. However, between those levels there exists a complex interplay of circulating cross-references. This, in turn, impacts the way state-religion relationships are negotiated: the normative framework and case law linked to the transnational field of human rights, but also to rights obtained in other national contexts, provide opportunities for demands by religious minorities, while also shaping the way such demands may be made.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01468053
Contributor : Elise Massicard <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, February 15, 2017 - 10:25:17 AM
Last modification on : Monday, June 17, 2019 - 6:26:05 PM
Long-term archiving on : Tuesday, May 16, 2017 - 12:31:30 PM

File

Elise Massicard final.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Elise Massicard. La judiciarisation contrastée de la question alévie, de la Turquie à l'Europe. Revue Francaise de Science Politique, Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques, 2014, 64 (4), pp.711-733. ⟨https://www.cairn.info/revue-francaise-de-science-politique-2014-4-page-711.htm⟩. ⟨10.3917/rfsp.644.0711⟩. ⟨halshs-01468053⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

80

Files downloads

129