J. Rawls, 1971 A theory of justice

A. Sen, Collective choice and social welfare, 1984.

L. Kohlberg, The philosophy of moral development: moral stages and the idea of justice, 1981.

M. Hsu, C. Anen, and S. Quartz, The Right and the Good: Distributive Justice and Neural Encoding of Equity and Efficiency, Science, vol.39, issue.12, pp.1092-1095, 2008.
DOI : 10.1097/00004583-200012000-00007

E. Fehr and K. Schmidt, The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism?experimental evidence and new theories In Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity, Handbooks in economics 23, 2006.

P. Brañas-garza, A. Espín, F. Exadaktylos, and B. Herrmann, Fair and unfair punishers coexist in the Ultimatum Game, Scientific Reports, vol.121, issue.1, p.6025
DOI : 10.1016/j.econlet.2013.08.021

A. Espín, F. Exadaktylos, B. Herrmann, and P. Brañas-garza, 2015 Short-and long-run goals in ultimatum bargaining: impatience predicts spite-based behavior, Front. Behav. Neurosci

G. Charness and M. Rabin, Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.117, issue.3, pp.817-869, 2002.
DOI : 10.1162/003355302760193904
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.143.3044

E. Fehr and K. Schmidt, A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.114, issue.3, pp.817-868
DOI : 10.1162/003355399556151

P. Van-lange, W. Otten, D. Bruin, E. Joireman, and J. , Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.73, issue.4, pp.733-746
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.733

D. Messick and C. Mcclintock, Motivational bases of choice in experimental games, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol.4, issue.1, pp.1-25, 1968.
DOI : 10.1016/0022-1031(68)90046-2

B. Corgnet, A. Espín, and R. Hernán-gonzález, 2015 The cognitive basis of social behavior: cognitive reflection overrides antisocial but not always prosocial motives, Front. Behav. Neurosci

A. Espín, P. Brañas-garza, B. Herrmann, and J. Gamella, 2012 Patient and impatient punishers of free-riders

D. Engelmann and M. Strobel, Inequality Aversion, Efficiency, and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments, American Economic Review, vol.94, issue.4, pp.857-869, 2004.
DOI : 10.1257/0002828042002741
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.310.3267

V. Capraro, 2013 A model of human cooperation in social dilemmas, PLoS ONE, vol.8

S. Chaiken and Y. Trope, Dual-process theories in social psychology, 1999.

D. Kahneman, 2011 Thinking, fast and slow

S. Sloman, The empirical case for two systems of reasoning., Psychological Bulletin, vol.119, issue.1, 1996.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3

J. Evans, In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.7, issue.10, pp.454-459, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012

I. Krajbich, B. Bartling, T. Hare, and E. Fehr, Rethinking fast and slow based on a critique of reaction-time reverse inference, Nature Communications, vol.5, pp.7455-7465
DOI : 10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4

G. Kraft-todd, E. Yoeli, S. Bhanot, and D. Rand, Promoting cooperation in the field, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, vol.3, pp.96-101
DOI : 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.02.006

S. Roch, J. Lane, C. Samuelson, S. Allison, and J. Dent, Cognitive Load and the Equality Heuristic: A Two-Stage Model of Resource Overconsumption in Small Groups, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.83, issue.2, pp.185-212, 2000.
DOI : 10.1006/obhd.2000.2915

C. Feng, Y. Long, and F. Krueger, Neural signatures of fairness-related normative decision making in the ultimatum game: A coordinate-based meta-analysis, Human Brain Mapping, vol.8, issue.2, pp.591-602
DOI : 10.1002/hbm.22649

P. Conway and B. Gawronski, Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.104, issue.2, pp.216-235, 31021.
DOI : 10.1037/a0031021

J. Greene, S. Morelli, K. Lowenberg, L. Nystrom, and J. Cohen, Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment, Cognition, vol.107, issue.3, pp.1144-1154, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2429958

R. Suter and R. Hertwig, 2011 Time and moral judgment, Cognition, vol.119, pp.295-300

J. Paxton, L. Ungar, and J. Greene, Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment, Cognitive Science, vol.16, issue.10, pp.163-177
DOI : 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01210.x
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.229.2934

B. Trémolière, D. Neys, W. Bonnefon, and J. , Mortality salience and morality: Thinking about death makes people less utilitarian, Cognition, vol.124, issue.3, pp.379-384
DOI : 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.011

G. Ponti and I. Rodriguez-lara, 2015 Social preferences and cognitive reflection: evidence from a dictator game experiment, Front. Behav. Neurosci
DOI : 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00146
URL : http://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00146

R. Sheremeta, 2015 Impulsive behavior in competition: testing theories of overbidding in rent-seeking contests

B. Bartling, E. Fehr, M. Maréchal, and D. Schunk, Egalitarianism and Competitiveness, American Economic Review, vol.99, issue.2, pp.93-98, 2009.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.99.2.93
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.208.8781

S. Frederick, Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.19, issue.4, pp.25-42, 2005.
DOI : 10.1257/089533005775196732

M. Toplak, R. West, and K. Stanovich, Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test, Thinking & Reasoning, vol.7, issue.100, pp.147-168
DOI : 10.1037/a0028857

A. Sinayev and E. Peters, 2015 Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making, Front. Psychol
DOI : 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00532
URL : http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00532

K. Thomson and D. Oppenheimer, 2016 Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test

R. Shiffrin and W. Schneider, Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory., Psychological Review, vol.84, issue.2, pp.127-190, 1977.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127

E. Miller and J. Cohen, An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function, Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol.24, issue.1, pp.167-202, 2001.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167

S. Gächter and J. Schulz, Intrinsic honesty and the prevalence of rule violations across societies, Nature, vol.45, issue.7595, pp.496-499, 17160.
DOI : 10.1038/nature17160

M. Stagnaro, A. Arechar, and D. Rand, 2016 From good institutions to good norms: top-down incentives to cooperate foster prosociality but not norm enforcement
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.2720585

R. Guha, India after Gandhi: the history of the world's largest democracy, 2007.

J. Quah, Curbing Corruption in India: An Impossible Dream?, Asian Journal of Political Science, vol.105, issue.3, pp.240-259, 2008.
DOI : 10.1080/02185370208434210

V. Capraro and G. Cococcioni, 2015 Social setting, intuition, and experience in laboratory experiments interact to shape cooperative decision-making
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.2559182
URL : http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.00481

E. Fehr, K. Hoff, and M. Kshetramade, Spite and Development, American Economic Review, vol.98, issue.2, pp.494-499, 2008.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.98.2.494

A. Bosch-domènech, P. Brañas-garza, and A. Espín, 2014 Can exposure to prenatal sex hormones (2D: 4D) predict cognitive reflection?, Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol.43

V. Capraro and G. Cococcioni, Rethinking spontaneous giving: Extreme time pressure and ego-depletion favor self-regarding reactions, Scientific Reports, vol.14, issue.1, pp.27219-27229, 27219.
DOI : 10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7
URL : http://doi.org/10.1038/srep27219

A. Cappelen, U. Nielsen, B. Tungodden, J. Tyran, and E. Wengström, Fairness is intuitive, Experimental Economics, vol.498, issue.4, pp.727-740
DOI : 10.1007/s10683-015-9463-y

L. Artavia-mora, A. Bedi, and M. Rieger, 2016 Intuitive cooperation in the field

D. Rand, J. Greene, and M. Nowak, Spontaneous giving and calculated greed, Nature, vol.320, issue.7416, pp.427-430
DOI : 10.1038/nature11467

A. Bear and D. Rand, 2016 Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, pp.936-941

D. Rand, V. Brescoll, J. Everett, V. Capraro, and H. Barcelo, Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.145, issue.4, pp.389-396
DOI : 10.1037/xge0000154

D. Rand, Cooperation, Fast and Slow, Psychological Science, vol.27, issue.9, pp.1192-1206
DOI : 10.1177/0963721413492764

J. Chandler, G. Paolacci, E. Peer, P. Mueller, and K. Ratliff, Using Nonnaive Participants Can Reduce Effect Sizes, Psychological Science, vol.4, issue.2, pp.1131-1139
DOI : 10.1037/h0032351

D. Rand and G. Kraft-todd, 2014 Reflection does not undermine self-interested prosociality
DOI : 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00300
URL : http://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00300

D. Rand and M. Nowak, Human cooperation, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.17, issue.8, pp.413-425
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.003

G. Tinghög, Intuition and cooperation reconsidered, Nature, vol.489, issue.7452, pp.1-2
DOI : 10.1038/nature12194

P. Verkoeijen and S. Bouwmeester, 2014 Does intuition cause cooperation? PLoS ONE 9
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0096654
URL : http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096654

K. Myrseth, C. Wollbrant, and . Rand, 2015 Intuitive cooperation refuted: commentary on, Working Papers in Economics, p.617, 2012.

J. Lohse, Smart or selfish ??? When smart guys finish nice, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, vol.64, pp.28-40
DOI : 10.1016/j.socec.2016.04.002
URL : http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/17748/1/Lohse_2014_dp578.pdf

D. Dickinson and T. Mcelroy, 2016 Moderate sleep restriction and time-of-day impacts on simple social interactions. (http://www.chapman.edu/ research-and-institutions/economic-science- institute/_files/ifree-papers-and-photos/Sleep- Barg-Trust, 2016.

N. Raihani, R. Mace, and S. Lamba, 2013 The effect of $1, $5 and $10 stakes in an online Dictator Game, PLoS ONE, vol.8

J. Busse and C. Green, Market efficiency in real time, Journal of Financial Economics, vol.65, issue.3, pp.415-437
DOI : 10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00148-4
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.197.6022

M. Kocher, J. Pahlke, and S. Trautmann, : Time Pressure in Risky Decisions, Management Science, vol.59, issue.10, pp.2380-2391
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1711

A. Roth and A. Ockenfels, Last-Minute Bidding and the Rules for Ending Second-Price Auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon Auctions on the Internet, American Economic Review, vol.92, issue.4, pp.1138-1151, 2002.
DOI : 10.1257/00028280260344632

C. Hilbe, M. Hoffman, and M. Nowak, 2015 Cooperate without looking in a non-repeated game, pp.458-472
DOI : 10.3390/g6040458
URL : http://doi.org/10.3390/g6040458

M. Hoffman, E. Yoeli, and M. Nowak, 2015 Cooperate without looking: why we care what people think and not just what they do, Proc. Natl Acad
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.1417904112
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4330730

V. Capraro and J. Kuilder, 2016 To know or not to know? Looking at payoffs signals selfish behavior but it does not actually mean so, J. Behav. Exp
DOI : 10.1016/j.socec.2016.08.005

J. Jordan, M. Hoffman, M. Nowak, and D. Rand, 2016 Uncalculating cooperation as a signal of trustworthiness, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, pp.8658-8663, 1601280113.

R. Baumeister, E. Bratslavsky, M. Muraven, and D. Tice, Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.74, issue.5, pp.1252-1265, 1998.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252

N. Mead, R. Baumeister, F. Gino, M. Schweitzer, and D. Ariely, Too tired to tell the truth: Self-control resource depletion and dishonesty, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol.45, issue.3, pp.594-597, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.004
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2680601

H. Xu, L. Bègue, and B. Bushman, Too fatigued to care: Ego depletion, guilt, and prosocial behavior, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol.48, issue.5, pp.1183-1186
DOI : 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.03.007

K. Yam, S. Reynolds, and J. Hirsch, The hungry thief: Physiological deprivation and its effects on unethical behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.125, issue.2, pp.123-133
DOI : 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.07.002

V. Capraro, The emergence of hyper-altruistic behaviour in conflictual situations, Scientific Reports, vol.75, issue.1, pp.9916-9926
DOI : 10.1002/9780470753552.ch14

M. Crockett, Z. Kurth-nelson, J. Siegel, P. Dayan, and R. Dolan, 2014 Harm to others outweighs harm to self in moral decision making, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, pp.320-337
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.1408988111
URL : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4260587

P. Kitcher, The Evolution of Human Altruism, The Journal of Philosophy, vol.90, issue.10, pp.497-516, 1993.
DOI : 10.2307/2941024

D. Rand and Z. Epstein, 2014 Risking your life without a second thought: intuitive decision-making and extreme altruism, PLoS ONE, vol.9
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.2424036

G. Paolacci, J. Chandler, and P. Ipeirotis, 2010 Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk, Judgm. Decis. Making, vol.5, pp.411-419

J. Horton, D. Rand, and R. Zeckhauser, The online laboratory: conducting experiments in??a??real??labor??market, Experimental Economics, vol.211, issue.4481, pp.399-425, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s10683-011-9273-9

D. Rand, The promise of Mechanical Turk: How online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments, Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol.299, pp.172-179
DOI : 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.03.004

A. Berinsky, G. Huber, and G. Lenz, Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk, Political Analysis, vol.17, issue.03, pp.351-368
DOI : 10.1177/1745691610393980

G. Paolacci and J. Chandler, Inside the Turk, Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol.43, issue.2, pp.184-188
DOI : 10.1038/nature11467

O. Amir, D. Rand, and Y. Gal, 2012 Economic games on the Internet: the effect of $1 stakes, PLoS ONE, vol.7

R. Forsythe, J. Horowitz, N. Savin, and M. Sefton, Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments, Games and Economic Behavior, vol.6, issue.3, pp.347-369, 1994.
DOI : 10.1006/game.1994.1021

M. Kocher, P. Martinsson, and M. Visser, Does stake size matter for cooperation and punishment? Econ, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.econlet.2007.09.048
URL : https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18186/1/Kocher_Does_stake_size_18186.pdf

L. Cameron, RAISING THE STAKES IN THE ULTIMATUM GAME: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FROM INDONESIA, Economic Inquiry, vol.27, issue.3, pp.47-59, 1999.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1999.tb01415.x

A. Arechar, S. Gächter, and L. Molleman, 2016 Conducting interactive experiments online. (https://ssrn
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.2884409

L. Schwartz, S. Woloshin, W. Black, and H. Welch, The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening Mammography, Annals of Internal Medicine, vol.127, issue.11, pp.966-972, 1997.
DOI : 10.7326/0003-4819-127-11-199712010-00003

E. Cokely, M. Galesic, E. Schulz, S. Ghazal, and R. Garcia-retamero, 2012 Measuring risk literacy: the Berlin Numeracy Test, Judgm. Decis. Making, vol.7, pp.25-47
DOI : 10.1037/e683152011-109

P. Brañas-garza, P. Kujal, and B. Lenkei, 2015 Cognitive Reflection Test: whom, how, when

V. Capraro, B. Corgnet, A. Espín, and R. Hernán-gonzález, 2017 Data from: Deliberation favours social efficiency by making people disregard their relative shares: evidence from USA and India, Dryad Digital Repository
DOI : 10.1098/rsos.160605
URL : http://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160605

P. Brañas-garza, P. Kujal, and B. Lenkei, 2015 Cognitive reflection test: whom, how, when

D. Engelmann, How not to extend models of inequality aversion, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.81, issue.2, pp.599-605, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.007