A Discrepancy-Based Framework to Compare Robustness Between Multi-attribute Evaluations - HAL-SHS - Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société Accéder directement au contenu
Communication Dans Un Congrès Année : 2016

A Discrepancy-Based Framework to Compare Robustness Between Multi-attribute Evaluations

Résumé

Multi-objective evaluation is a necessary aspect when managing complex systems, as the intrinsic complexity of a system is generally closely linked to the potential number of optimization objectives. However, an evaluation makes no sense without its robustness being given (in the sense of its reliability). Statistical robustness computation methods are highly dependent of underlying statistical models. We propose a formulation of a model-independent framework in the case of integrated aggregated indicators (Multi-attribute evaluation), that allows to define a relative measure of robustness taking into account data structure and indicator values. We implement and apply it to a synthetic case of urban systems based on Paris districts geography, and to real data for evaluation of income segregation for Greater Paris metropolitan area. First numerical results show the potentialities of this new method. Furthermore , its relative independence to system type and system model may position it as an alternative to classical statistical robustness methods.

Domaines

Géographie
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
CSDM_2016_paper_26.pdf (2.8 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
CSDM2016_Raimbault_Discrepancy_v2.pdf (4.35 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

halshs-01424253 , version 1 (02-01-2017)

Identifiants

Citer

Juste Raimbault. A Discrepancy-Based Framework to Compare Robustness Between Multi-attribute Evaluations. CSD&M 2016, Dec 2016, Paris, France. pp.141 - 154, ⟨10.1007/978-3-319-49103-5_11⟩. ⟨halshs-01424253⟩
534 Consultations
197 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More