M. Aaltola, Emergency food aid as a means of political persuasion in the North Korean famine, Third World Quarterly, vol.20, issue.2, pp.371-386, 1999.
DOI : 10.1080/01436599913802

F. Z. Ahmed and E. D. Werker, Online Appendix, Quarterly Journal of Political Science, vol.10, issue.2, pp.155-186, 2015.
DOI : 10.1561/100.00014060_app

I. Aldasoro, P. Nunnenkamp, and R. Thiele, Less aid proliferation and more donor coordination? The wide gap between words and deeds, Journal of International Development, vol.6, issue.3, pp.920-940, 2010.
DOI : 10.1002/jid.1645

J. Andreoni, Leadership Giving in Charitable Fund-Raising, Journal of Public Economic Theory, vol.39, issue.1, pp.1-22, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00187-6

K. Annen and L. Moers, Donor competition for aid impact, and aid fragmentation

P. M. Aronow, A. Carnegie, and N. Marinov, Foreign Aid, Human Rights and Democracy Promotion: Evidence from a Natural Experiment, American Journal of Political Science, p.2016

C. Barrett and D. Maxwell, Food Aid After Fifty Years: Recasting Its Role. Priorities for development economics, Routledge, 2005.

C. B. Barrett and K. C. Heisey, How Effectively Does Multilateral Food Aid Respond to Fluctuating Needs? Food Policy, pp.5-6477, 2002.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.329626

F. Barthel, E. Neumayer, P. Nunnenkamp, and P. Selaya, Competition for Export Markets and the Allocation of Foreign Aid: The Role of Spatial Dependence among Donor Countries, World Development, vol.64, issue.0, pp.350-365, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.06.009

M. F. Bellemare, T. Masaki, and T. B. Pepinsky, Lagged Explanatory Variables and the Estimation of Causal Effects, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015.
DOI : 10.2139/ssrn.2568724

J. Berthélemy, Bilateral Donor's Interest vs. Recipients' Development Motives in Aid Allocation: Do All Donors Behave the Same? Review of Development Economics, pp.179-194, 2006.

J. Berthélemy, Aid Allocation: Comparing Donors' Behaviours, Swedish Economic Policy Review, vol.13, issue.2, pp.75-110, 2006.

T. Besley and R. Burgess, The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.117, issue.4, pp.1415-1451, 2002.
DOI : 10.1162/003355302320935061

J. B. Burbidge, L. Magee, and A. L. Robb, Alternative Transformations to Handle Extreme Values of the Dependent Variable, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.66, issue.401, pp.123-127, 1988.
DOI : 10.1080/01621459.1984.10478045

V. Chernozhukov and C. Hansen, The reduced form: A simple approach to inference with weak instruments, Economics Letters, vol.100, issue.1, pp.68-71, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.econlet.2007.11.012

E. J. Clay, S. Dhiri, and C. Benson, Joint Evaluation of European Union Programme Food Aid. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Danida, 1996.

P. Clist, 25 Years of Aid Allocation Practice: Whither Selectivity? World Development, pp.1724-1734, 2011.

J. D. Coffey, The Role of Food in the International Affairs of the United States, Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.12, issue.01, pp.29-37, 1981.
DOI : 10.2307/3180368

R. Davies and S. Klasen, Of Donor Coordination, Free-Riding, Darlings, and Orphans: The dependence of bilateral aid on other bilateral giving, CESifo Working Paper Series, 2015.

S. Dietrich and J. Wright, Foreign Aid Allocation Tactics and Democratic Change in Africa, The Journal of Politics, vol.77, issue.1, pp.216-234, 2015.
DOI : 10.1086/678976
URL : http://repository.essex.ac.uk/17405/1/JOP%20Final%20MS%2BApp%20%2Burl.pdf

A. Dreher and S. Langlotz, Aid and Growth. New Evidence Using an Excludable Instrument. CEPR Discussion Paper No, 2015.

R. K. Fleck and C. Kilby, Changing aid regimes? U.S. foreign aid from the Cold War to the War on Terror, Journal of Development Economics, vol.91, issue.2, pp.185-197, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.09.011

E. Frot and J. Santiso, Herding in Aid Allocation, Kyklos, vol.54, issue.(3, pp.54-74, 2011.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-6435.2010.00494.x

A. Fuchs and K. C. Vadlamannati, The Needy Donor: An Empirical Analysis of India's Aid Motives, World Development, vol.442, issue.C00, pp.110-128, 2013.

4. Table, Bilateral response to EU food aid allocation Notes: An observation is a recipient and a year. For each donor d the sample includes a maximum of 27 small countries. Coefficients are reported with standard errors bootstrapped and clustered at the recipient and year level. All regressions control for the set of baseline controls (see column

B. Table and . 5?, Bilateral response to EU food aid allocation ? All recipients

B. Table and . 7?, Estimates of donors' type Notes: ? d ? d = 1?? d 1+? d . In brackets, the confidence interval at a 10 percent level. Estimates are derived from results obtained in table 4 in section IV