The dangers of theorizing before analysis : four case studies about argumentation and cognition

Abstract : In this talk, we briefly compare and contrast two research traditions: the hypothetico-deductive and the ethnomethodological. We will present three case studies from our own research that mostly exemplify the hypothetico-deductive tradition.We will illustrate with these case studies three different dangers of theorizing before analysis and how we saved ourselves from these dangers.
Type de document :
Communication dans un congrès
Empirical Approaches to Argumentation, Jul 2014, Paris, France
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01392574
Contributeur : Matthieu Quignard <>
Soumis le : vendredi 4 novembre 2016 - 14:45:06
Dernière modification le : samedi 3 novembre 2018 - 16:48:16

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : halshs-01392574, version 1

Collections

Citation

Kristine Lund, Matthieu Quignard. The dangers of theorizing before analysis : four case studies about argumentation and cognition. Empirical Approaches to Argumentation, Jul 2014, Paris, France. 〈halshs-01392574〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

52