R. Amossy, L'argumentation dans le discours, 2006.

J. Andriessen, M. Pardijs, and M. Baker, Getting on and Getting Along: Tension in the Developement of Collaborations, 2013.

. Andriessen, Routledge, pp.205-228

C. Asterhan and . Sc, Epistemic and interpersonal dimensions of peer argumentation, Eds) Affective Learning Together, pp.251-271, 2013.

M. Baker, J. Andriessen, and K. Lund, Socio-relational, affective and cognitive dimensions of CSCL interactions, Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning, CSCL'09, pp.31-33, 2009.
DOI : 10.3115/1599503.1599515
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01493909

M. Baker, S. Järvelä, and J. Andriessen, Affective Learning Together: Social and Emotional Dimensions of Collaborative Learning, 2013.

M. Baker, M. Quignard, K. Lund, and M. Van-amelsvoort, Designing a computer-supported collaborative learning situation for broadening and deepening understanding of the space of debate, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, pp.55-61, 2002.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00376668

P. Brown and S. C. Levinson, Politeness, 1988.

C. Caffi and R. W. Janney, Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.22, issue.3-4, pp.3-4, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/0378-2166(94)90115-5

B. Cahour, Characteristics, emergence and circulation in interactional learning, Eds) Affective Learning Together, pp.52-70, 2013.

J. Cosnier, Psychologie des émotions et des sentiments, 1994.

A. Denis, M. Quignard, D. Fréard, F. Détienne, and M. Baker, Détection de conflits dans les communautés épistémiques en ligne, Proceedings of TALN 2012 Actes de la conférence conjointe JEP-TALN-RECITAL, pp.351-358, 2012.

P. Dillenbourg, P. Et, . H. Jermann, &. R. Van, and . Grootendorst, Designing integrative scripts A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach, 2004.

M. Fernández, R. Wegerif, N. Mercer, and S. Rojas-drummond, Reconceptualizing 'scaffolding' and the zone of proximal development in the context of symmetrical collaborative learning, Journal of Classroom Interaction, vol.36, issue.21, pp.40-54, 2002.

M. A. Gilbert, Emotion, Argumentation and Informal Logic, Informal Logic, vol.24, issue.3, pp.245-264, 2004.
DOI : 10.22329/il.v24i3.2147

E. Goffman, Les rites d'interaction, 1974.

D. S. Gouran, Moving forward/Looking back : The functions of argument in inducing and managing conflict in decision-making and problem-solving groups. National Communication Association, 2004.

J. B. Grize, Logique naturelle et communication, 1996.

M. P. Jimenez-aleixandre, Les personnes peuvent-elles agir sur la réalité ? La théorie critique et la marée noire du Prestige, L'école à l'épreuve de l'actualité : enseigner les questions vives, pp.105-118, 2006.

H. Järvenoja and S. Järvelä, Regulating Emotions Together for Motivated Collaboration, (Eds) Affective Learning Together, pp.162-181, 2013.

M. Lipman, Thiniking in Education, 2003.

N. Mercer, The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and instruction, pp.359-377, 1996.

N. Mercer and K. Littleton, Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: a sociocultural approach, 2007.

N. Mercer and C. Sams, Teaching Children How to Use Language to Solve Maths Problems, Language and Education, vol.19, issue.6, pp.507-528, 2006.
DOI : 10.2307/749187

N. Mercer, R. Wegerif, and L. Dawes, Children's Talk and the Development of Reasoning in the Classroom, British Educational Research Journal, vol.7, issue.1, pp.95-111, 1999.
DOI : 10.1080/0268093920070103

S. Michaels, M. C. O-'connor, R. Sohmer, and L. Resnick, Guided construction of knowledge in the classroom: Teacher, talk, task, and tools. The Reading Teacher, pp.316-326, 1992.

R. Micheli, L'émotion augmentée: l'abolition de la peine de mort dans le débat parlementaire français, 2010.

P. Muntigl and W. Turnbull, Conversational structure and facework in arguing, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.29, issue.3, pp.225-256, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00048-9

C. Plantin, (in press) Dictionnaire de l'argumentation -Une introduction notionnelle aux études d'argumentation

C. Plantin, Emotion and Affect The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, pp.514-523, 2015.

C. Plantin, Les bonnes raisons des émotions : principes et méthode pour l'étude du discours « émotionné, 2011.
DOI : 10.3726/978-3-0352-0070-6

C. Polo, L'eau à la bouche : ressources et travail argumentatifs des élèves lors de débats socio-scientifiques sur l'eau potable, Etude comparée de 10 cafés scientifiques menés au Mexique, aux USA et en France, 2011.

C. Polo, C. Plantin, K. Lund, and G. Niccolai, Quand construire une position émotionnelle, c'est choisir une conclusion argumentative, pp.41-63, 2013.

A. Pomerantz, Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, pp.57-101, 1984.

J. Roschelle and S. D. Teasley, The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving, Proceedings of CSCL 1995, pp.69-97, 1995.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5

R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being., American Psychologist, vol.55, issue.1, pp.68-78, 2000.
DOI : 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

O. Scheuer, F. Loll, N. Pinkwart, and B. M. Mclaren, Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol.46, issue.1, pp.43-102, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s11412-009-9080-x

P. Sins and K. Karlgren, Identifying and Overcoming Tension in Interdisciplinary Teamwork in Profesional Development, Eds) Affective Learning Together, pp.185-203, 2013.

R. Soussignan, Duchenne smile, emotional experience, and autonomic reactivity: A test of the facial feedback hypothesis., Emotion, vol.2, issue.1, pp.52-74, 2002.
DOI : 10.1037/1528-3542.2.1.52

G. Stahl, Group cognition, Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning learning 2005: the next 10 years!, CSCL '05, 2006.
DOI : 10.3115/1149293.1149376

S. E. Toulmin, The uses of argument, 1958.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511840005

V. Traverso, Négociation et argumentation dans la conversation familière, Escritos, pp.51-89, 1999.

D. N. Walton, The place of emotion in argument, 1992.

R. Wegerif, Reason and Creativity in Classroom Dialogues, Language and Education, vol.1, issue.3, pp.223-260, 2005.
DOI : 10.1080/09500789808666739

R. Wegerif and N. Mercer, A dialogical framework for researching peer talk. Language and Education Library, pp.49-64, 1997.

R. Wegerif, K. Littleton, L. Dawes, N. Mercer, and D. Rowe, Widening access to educational opportunities through teaching children how to reason together, Westminster Studies in Education, vol.27, issue.2, pp.143-156, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00013-4

A. Weinberger, Scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Effects of social and epistemic cooperation scripts on collaborative knowledge construction. Doctoral dissertation, 2003.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190171

A. Wierzbicka, The Relevance of Language to the Study of Emotions, Psychological Inquiry, vol.6, issue.3, pp.248-253, 1995.
DOI : 10.1207/s15327965pli0603_13