V. Albe, Diskursive Vorg??nge und soziale Rollen der Sch??ler in Diskussionsgruppen ??ber eine gesellschaftlich-wissenschaftliche Auseinandersetzung, Revue fran??aise de p??dagogie, issue.157, pp.103-118, 2006.
DOI : 10.4000/rfp.604

R. Alexander, Speaking but not listening? Accountable talk in an unaccountable context. Literacy, pp.103-111, 2010.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1741-4369.2010.00562.x

J. Allwood, D. Traum, and K. Jokinen, Cooperation, dialogue and ethics, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol.53, issue.6, pp.871-914, 2000.
DOI : 10.1006/ijhc.2000.0425

R. Amossy, L'argumentation dans le discours, 2006.

J. Andriessen, M. Pardijs, and M. Baker, Getting on and Getting Along: Tension in the Developement of Collaborations, Affective Learning Together, pp.205-228, 2013.

C. Asterhan, Epistemic and interpersonal dimensions of peer argumentation, Affective Learning Together, pp.251-271, 2013.

M. Baker and J. Andriessen, Socio-relational, affective and cognitive dimensions of CSCL interactions, Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning, CSCL'09, pp.31-33, 2009.
DOI : 10.3115/1599503.1599515

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01493909

M. Baker and S. Järvelä, Affective Learning Together: Social and Emotional Dimensions of Collaborative Learning, 2013.

M. Baker, M. Quignard, K. Lund, and M. Van-amelsvoort, Designing a computer-supported collaborative learning situation for broadening and deepening understanding of the space of debate, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, pp.55-61, 2002.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00376668

R. Bouchard and C. Rolet, Pour une méthodologie d'analyse didactico-interactionnelle des pratiques d'enseignement-apprentissage: à propos d'une séance de mathématiques à l'école primaire, Construction des connaissances et langage dans les disciplines d'enseignement Maryse Rebière, Jean-Paul Bernié. IUFM Aquitaine et Université Bordeaux 2, 2003.

C. Caffi, W. Richard, and . Janney, Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.22, issue.3-4, pp.3-4, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/0378-2166(94)90115-5

B. Cahour, Characteristics, Emergence and Circulation in Interactional Learning, Affective Learning Together, pp.52-69, 2013.

P. Dillenbourg and P. Jermann, Designing Integrative Scripts, Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, pp.275-301, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/978-0-387-36949-5_16

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190827

F. H. Eemeren, R. Van, and . Grootendorst, A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach, 2004.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511616389

M. Fernández, R. Wegerif, N. Mercer, and S. Rojas-drummond, Re-conceptualizing 'scaffolding' and the zone of proximal development in the context of symmetrical collaborative learning, Journal of Classroom Interaction, vol.36, issue.21, pp.40-54, 2002.

M. A. Gilbert, Coalescent argumentation, Argumentation, vol.16, issue.2, pp.837-852, 1995.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00744761

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.1026.1720

M. A. Gilbert, Emotional Messages, Argumentation, vol.15, issue.3, pp.239-249, 2001.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1011156918137

M. A. Gilbert, Emotion, Argumentation and Informal Logic, Informal Logic, vol.24, issue.3, pp.245-264, 2004.
DOI : 10.22329/il.v24i3.2147

URL : http://doi.org/10.22329/il.v24i3.2147

E. Goffman, Les rites d'interaction, 1974.

D. S. Gouran, Moving forward/Looking back: The functions of argument in inducing and managing conflict in decision-making and problem-solving groups, Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association. Chicago, 2004.

J. Grize, Logique naturelle et communication, 1996.

I. R. Hekmat, A. Micheli, and . Rabatel, 2013. Modes de sémiotisation et fonctions argumentatives des émotions, Semen, p.35

F. Jacques, Trois stratégies interactionnelles: conversation, négociation, dialogue, Échanges sur la conversation, pp.45-68, 1988.

H. Järvenoja and . Järvelä, Regulating Emotions Together for Motivated Collaboration, Affective Learning Together, pp.162-181, 2013.

M. W. Keefer, C. M. Zeitz, and L. B. Resnick, Judging the Quality of Peer-Led Student Dialogues, Cognition and Instruction, vol.2, issue.4, pp.53-81, 2000.
DOI : 10.1207/S1532690XCI1801_03

H. Kotthoff, Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures, Language in Society, vol.1, issue.02, pp.193-216, 1993.
DOI : 10.1525/sp.1988.35.4.03a00080

J. A. Kuypers, Rhetorical Criticism: Perspectives in Action, 2009.

J. A. Kuypers, Bush's War: Media Bias and Justifications for War in a Terrorist Age, 2006.

N. Mercer, The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and instruction, pp.359-377, 1996.

N. Mercer and K. Littleton, Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: a sociocultural approach, 2007.

N. Mercer and C. Sams, Teaching Children How to Use Language to Solve Maths Problems. Language and Education, pp.507-528, 2006.
DOI : 10.2167/le678.0

N. Mercer, R. Wegerif, and L. Dawes, Children's Talk and the Development of Reasoning in the Classroom, British Educational Research Journal, vol.7, issue.1, pp.95-111, 1999.
DOI : 10.1080/0268093920070103

S. Michaels, C. O. Connor, R. Sohmer, and L. B. Resnick, Guided construction of knowledge in the classroom: Teacher, talk, task, and tools. The Reading Teacher, pp.316-326, 1992.

S. Michaels, C. O. Connor, and L. B. Resnick, Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in the Classroom and in Civic Life, Studies in Philosophy and Education, vol.27, issue.4, pp.283-297, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1

R. Micheli, L'émotion argumentée: l'abolition de la peine de mort dans le débat parlementaire français, 2010.

R. Micheli, Esquisse d'une typologie des différents modes de sémiotisation verbale de l'émotion, Semen, pp.17-39, 2013.

D. Mullins, A. Deiglmayr, and H. Spada, Motivation and Emotion Shaping Knowledge, Affective Learning Together, pp.139-160, 2013.

P. Muntigl and W. Turnbull, Conversational structure and facework in arguing, Journal of Pragmatics, vol.29, issue.3, pp.225-256, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00048-9

A. Paveau, Interdiscours et intertexte Linguistique et littérature : Cluny, 40 ans après Annales littéraires de l'université de Franche-Comté, Presses universitaires de Franche- Comté, pp.93-105, 2008.

M. Pêcheux, Analyse automatique du discours, 1969.

C. Perelman and L. Olbrechts-tyteca, Traité de l'argumentation: la nouvelle rhétorique, 1958.

C. Plantin, In press Actants et acteurs, Dictionnaire de l'argumentation -Une introduction notionnelle aux études d'argumentation, pp.26-27

C. Plantin, In press. Politesse argumentative, Dictionnaire de l'argumentation -Une introduction notionnelle aux études d'argumentation: 369

C. Plantin, Emotion and Affect, The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, pp.514-523, 2015.
DOI : 10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi079

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01502969

C. Plantin, Les bonnes raisons des émotions : principes et méthode pour l'étude du discours « émotionné, 2011.
DOI : 10.3726/978-3-0352-0070-6

C. Polo, L'eau à la bouche: ressources et travail argumentatifs des élèves lors de débats socioscientifiques sur l'eau potable, Etude comparée de 10 cafés scientifiques menés au Mexique, aux USA et en France, 2011.

C. Polo, C. Plantin, K. Lund, and G. Niccolai, Quand construire une position émotionnelle, c'est choisir une conclusion argumentative, Semen, vol.35, pp.41-63, 2013.

A. Pomerantz, Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, pp.57-101, 1984.

J. Roschelle and S. D. Teasley, The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving, Proceedings of the Conference on Computer supported collaborative learning, pp.69-97, 1995.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5

R. M. Ryan, L. Edward, and . Deci, Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being., American Psychologist, vol.55, issue.1, p.68, 2000.
DOI : 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

D. R. Seibold, A. Renee, and . Meyers, Group Argument: A Structuration Perspective and Research Program, Small Group Research, vol.38, issue.3, pp.312-336, 2007.
DOI : 10.1177/1046496407301966

P. Sins and K. Karlgren, Identifying and Overcoming Tension in Interdisciplinary Teamwork in Profesional Development, Affective Learning Together, pp.185-203, 2013.

G. Stahl, Group cognition, Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning learning 2005: the next 10 years!, CSCL '05, 2006.
DOI : 10.3115/1149293.1149376

V. Traverso, Negociación y argumentación en la conversación familiar, Escritos Journal of the Center of Language Sciences, vol.1718, pp.51-89, 1999.

S. E. Toulmin, The uses of argument, 1958.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511840005

D. N. Walton, The place of emotion in argument, 1992.

R. &. Wegerif and N. Mercer, A dialogical framework for researching peer talk. Language and Education Library, pp.49-64, 1997.

R. Wegerif, K. Littleton, L. Dawes, N. Mercer, and D. Rowe, Widening access to educational opportunities through teaching children how to reason together, Westminster Studies in Education, vol.27, issue.2, pp.143-156, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00013-4

A. Weinberger, Scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Effects of social and epistemic cooperation scripts on collaborative knowledge construction. Doctoral Dissertation, 2003.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190171