Comparing Words to Debate about Drinking Water: Textometrics for Argumentation Studies

Abstract : In ten videotaped socio-scientific debates related to water,students from Mexico, the USA and France tend to focus on afew alternative positions. On the basis of Grize’s definition ofschematization, we followed their reasoning by studying howthey cast light on specific aspects of the discursive object“water”. Through textometrical analysis of debate transcripts,we specified 6 characteristics of “water” that are more or lessemphasized depending on the prevailing nationalargumentative scenario.
Type de document :
Communication dans un congrès
D. Mohammed; M. Lewiński. 1st European Conference on Argumentation Argumentation and Reasoned Action, 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. London: College Publications, 2, pp.821-838, Argumentation and Reasoned Action Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01335866
Contributeur : Référent Hal Icar <>
Soumis le : jeudi 5 janvier 2017 - 12:02:25
Dernière modification le : samedi 3 novembre 2018 - 16:45:54
Document(s) archivé(s) le : jeudi 6 avril 2017 - 12:05:19

Fichier

ECA15RP_PoloPlantinLundNiccola...
Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : halshs-01335866, version 1

Collections

Citation

Claire Polo, Christian Plantin, Kristine Lund, Gerald P. Niccolai. Comparing Words to Debate about Drinking Water: Textometrics for Argumentation Studies. D. Mohammed; M. Lewiński. 1st European Conference on Argumentation Argumentation and Reasoned Action, 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. London: College Publications, 2, pp.821-838, Argumentation and Reasoned Action Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015. 〈halshs-01335866〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

101

Téléchargements de fichiers

79