Comparing Words to Debate about Drinking Water: Textometrics for Argumentation Studies

Abstract : In ten videotaped socio-scientific debates related to water,students from Mexico, the USA and France tend to focus on afew alternative positions. On the basis of Grize’s definition ofschematization, we followed their reasoning by studying howthey cast light on specific aspects of the discursive object“water”. Through textometrical analysis of debate transcripts,we specified 6 characteristics of “water” that are more or lessemphasized depending on the prevailing nationalargumentative scenario.
Document type :
Conference papers
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01335866
Contributor : Référent Hal Icar <>
Submitted on : Thursday, January 5, 2017 - 12:02:25 PM
Last modification on : Saturday, November 3, 2018 - 4:45:54 PM
Document(s) archivé(s) le : Thursday, April 6, 2017 - 12:05:19 PM

File

ECA15RP_PoloPlantinLundNiccola...
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : halshs-01335866, version 1

Collections

Citation

Claire Polo, Christian Plantin, Kristine Lund, Gerald P. Niccolai. Comparing Words to Debate about Drinking Water: Textometrics for Argumentation Studies. 1st European Conference on Argumentation Argumentation and Reasoned Action, 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. pp.821-838. ⟨halshs-01335866⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

105

Files downloads

84