Political Budget Cycles: Manipulation from Leaders or Manipulation from Researchers? Evidence from a Meta-Regression Analysis

Abstract : Despite a long history of research on political budget cycles, their existence and magnitude are still in question. By conducting a systematic analysis of the existing literature we intend to clarify the debate. Based on data collected from over 1; 700 regressions and 57 studies, our meta-analysis suggests that leaders do manipulate fiscal tools in order to be re-elected but to an extent that is significantly exaggerated by scholars. However, we show the incumbents' strategy differs depending on which tools they leverage. Finally, we discuss in further details how authors' methodological choices and country institutions affect political budget cycles.
Document type :
Preprints, Working Papers, ...
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [84 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01320586
Contributor : Cerdi Etudes & Documents - Publications <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, May 24, 2016 - 10:36:18 AM
Last modification on : Thursday, January 11, 2018 - 6:17:19 AM

File

2016.09.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : halshs-01320586, version 1

Collections

Citation

Antoine Cazals, Pierre Mandon. Political Budget Cycles: Manipulation from Leaders or Manipulation from Researchers? Evidence from a Meta-Regression Analysis. 2016. ⟨halshs-01320586⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

287

Files downloads

505