Why should cladograms be dichotomous?

Abstract : A cladogram is usually considered as resolved when all its branching points are bifurcations. The problem we address in this contribution concerns foundations: is this “principle of dichotomy” empirically grounded in the hypothesis of dichotomous speciation? First, we survey Brundin’s (1966) and Hennig’s (1966) answers to this question: Hennig (1966), in particular, is cautious, and first claims that the principle of dichotomy is “no more than a methodological principle” (Hennig 1966: 210); but he soon concedes that it might also have empirical roots (Hennig 1966: 211). Second, we examine Platnick’s (1979) and Nelson and Platnick’s (1981) contributions, which stick to Hennig’s first intuition, and try to reduce the principle of dichotomy to a mere methodological requirement of science. Third, we suggest our own solution: the principle of dichotomy is a methodological and theoretical requirement not only of science, but also and above all of phylogenetic systematics itself. Cladograms—taxa and their relationships—are the result of a Cartesian analysis, which consists in the decomposition of taxa into homologies, i.e. hypotheses of identity. Now, identity is best represented by a ternary relationship, where two features are more identical to each other than any is to a third one. The foundation of taxa and their relationships upon homologies thus results in an intrinsically dichotomous pattern.
Type de document :
Chapitre d'ouvrage
Williams, D. M.; Schmitt, M.; Wheeler, Q. The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics : The Legacy of Willi Hennig, Cambridge University Press, pp.230-257, 2016
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01304788
Contributeur : Sophie Pécaud <>
Soumis le : mercredi 20 avril 2016 - 12:40:02
Dernière modification le : mercredi 28 septembre 2016 - 15:53:43

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : halshs-01304788, version 1

Collections

Citation

René Zaragüeta I Bagils, Sophie Pécaud. Why should cladograms be dichotomous?. Williams, D. M.; Schmitt, M.; Wheeler, Q. The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics : The Legacy of Willi Hennig, Cambridge University Press, pp.230-257, 2016. <halshs-01304788>

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

114