Only One Tree from Each Seed? Environmental Effectiveness and Poverty Alleviation in Mexico???s Payments for Ecosystem Services Program, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, vol.7, issue.4, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1257/pol.20130139
Forest Conservation and Slippage: Evidence from Mexico's National Payments for Ecosystem Services Program, Land Economics, vol.88, issue.4, pp.613-638, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.3368/le.88.4.613
A spatial econometric approach to spillover effects between protected areas and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon, p.6, 2014. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00960476
Protected areas reduced poverty in Costa Rica and Thailand, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.107, issue.22, pp.9996-10001, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.0914177107
Shifting cultivation and ???deforestation???: A study from Indonesia, World Development, vol.23, issue.10, pp.1713-1729, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0305-750X(95)00070-S
Rethinking the causes of deforestation: Lessons from economic models. The World Bank Research Observer, pp.73-98, 1999. ,
Agricultural technologies and tropical deforestation, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1079/9780851994512.0000
Do Payments for Environmental Services Affect Forest Cover? A Farm-Level Evaluation from Costa Rica, Land Economics, vol.88, issue.2, pp.382-399, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.3368/le.88.2.382
A conceptual framework and its application for addressing leakage: the case of avoided deforestation, Climate Policy, vol.77, issue.1, pp.123-136, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.2307/2845977
An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies, Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol.110, issue.3, pp.399-424, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.03.018
Mainstreaming Impact Evaluation in Nature Conservation, Conservation Letters, vol.1, issue.19, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1111/conl.12180
Mexico's Community-Managed Forests as a Global Model for Sustainable Landscapes, Conservation Biology, vol.6, issue.1, pp.672-677, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1080/089419202317174002
Estimating the Impacts of Bolivia???s Protected Areas on Poverty, World Development, vol.41, pp.265-285, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.06.011
Baseline, leakage and measurement issues: how do forestry and energy projects compare? Climate Policy, pp.35-49, 2002. ,
How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico? PloS one, p.119881, 2015. ,
Deforestation, leakage and avoided deforestation policies: A spatial analysis, Resource and Energy Economics, vol.45, pp.2015-2021, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.06.006
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01350831
Counterfactual thinking and impact evaluation in environmental policy, New Directions for Evaluation, vol.20, issue.1, pp.75-84, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1002/ev.297
Advances in Measuring the Environmental and Social Impacts of Environmental Programs, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, vol.39, issue.1, pp.495-517, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1146/annurev-environ-101813-013230
Direct payments to conserve biodiversity, Himalayan Journal of Sciences, vol.1, issue.2, pp.2981718-1719, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.3126/hjs.v1i2.200
Money for Nothing? A Call for Empirical Evaluation of Biodiversity Conservation Investments, PLoS Biology, vol.20, issue.4, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040105
Efficiency of Payments for Environmental Services: Equity and additionality in a case study from a Biosphere Reserve in Chiapas, Mexico, Ecological Economics, vol.70, issue.12, pp.702361-2368, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.016
A qualitative method to consider leakage effects from CDM and JI projects, Energy Policy, vol.30, issue.6, pp.461-463, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00113-6
Estimation of causal effects using propensity score weighting: An application to data on right heart catheterization, Health Services and Outcomes research methodology, pp.259-278, 2001. ,
Liquidity Constraints and Deforestation: The Limitations of Payments for Ecosystem Services, American Economic Review, vol.103, issue.3, pp.309-322, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1257/aer.103.3.309
Reassessing the forest impacts of protection, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol.15, issue.1, pp.135-149, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05162.x
High and Far: Biases in the Location of Protected Areas, PLoS ONE, vol.4, issue.12, p.8273, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0008273.s002
Combining conservation incentives with investment. Perspective, Environmental Policies, 2011. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00723556
Du mésusage des métaphores -les paiements pour services environnementaux sont-ils des instruments de marchandisation de la nature, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.3917/rdm.042.0261
URL : http://agritrop.cirad.fr/571627/
editor, L'instrumentation de l'action publique -Controverses, résistances, effets, pp.161-189 ,
Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study, Statistics in Medicine, vol.23, issue.19, pp.2937-2960, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1002/sim.7231
Conditional Cash Transfers and Payments for Environmental Services???A Conceptual Framework for Explaining and Judging Differences in Outcomes, World Development, vol.43, pp.124-137, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.10.006
Evaluation of biodiversity policy instruments: what works and what doesn't?, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol.28, issue.1, pp.69-92, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1093/oxrep/grs009
Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: Analysis, negotiations and results, Ecological Economics, vol.65, issue.4, pp.725-736, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.031
Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win solutions, Conservation Letters, vol.69, issue.20, pp.274-279 ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00309.x
Estimating Leakage from Forest Carbon Sequestration Programs, Land Economics, vol.80, issue.1, pp.109-124, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.2307/3147147
URL : http://hdl.handle.net/10419/70427
Show Me the Money: Do Payments Supply Environmental Services in Developing Countries?, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, vol.4, issue.2, pp.254-274, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1093/reep/req006
Park Location Affects Forest Protection: Land Characteristics Cause Differences in Park Impacts across Costa Rica, The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, vol.9, issue.2, pp.1-24, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.2202/1935-1682.1990
Questioning the theory of payments for ecosystem services in light of emerging experience and plausible developments, 2010. ,
Evaluating anti-poverty programs. Handbook of development economics, pp.3787-3846, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1596/1813-9450-3625
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.494.5504
Ecopayments and Deforestation in Costa Rica: A Nationwide Analysis of PSA's Initial Years, Land Economics, vol.89, issue.3, pp.432-448, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.3368/le.89.3.432
Analysis of Semiparametric Regression Models for Repeated Outcomes in the Presence of Missing Data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.11, issue.427, pp.90106-121, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478441
Understanding and managing leakage in forest-based greenhouse-gas-mitigation projects, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol.360, issue.1797, pp.3601685-1703, 1797. ,
DOI : 10.1098/rsta.2002.1040
Conservation and development: Evidence from Thai protected areas, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.60, issue.2, pp.94-114, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2010.05.003
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.473.7680
Improving environmental and social targeting through adaptive management in Mexico's payments for hydrological services program, Conservation Biology, vol.28, issue.5, pp.1151-1159, 2014. ,
Measuring leakage from carbon projects in open economies: a stop timber harvesting project in Bolivia as a case study, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol.34, issue.4, pp.829-839, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1139/x03-249
Payments for ecosystem services: Getting started, 2008. ,
On regression adjustment for the propensity score, Statistics in Medicine, vol.31, issue.23, pp.4053-4072, 2014. ,
DOI : 10.1002/sim.6207
Land use, land-use change and forestry: a special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2000. ,
Slippage Effects of the Conservation Reserve Program, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.82, issue.4, pp.979-992, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1111/0002-9092.00096
Environmental and Distributional Impacts of Conservation Targeting Strategies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.41, issue.3, pp.333-350, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.2000.1146
How should we deal with leakage? In Moving ahead with REDD: issues , options and implications, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), 2008. ,
Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services, Ecological Economics, vol.117, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.016